Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Anesthesiology & Critical Care, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
J Clin Monit Comput. 2013 Feb;27(1):47-53. doi: 10.1007/s10877-012-9391-8. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
The genesis of cardiogenic oscillations, i.e. the small waves in airway pressure (COS(paw)) and flow (COS(flow)) signals recorded at the airway opening is under debate. We hypothesized that these waves are originated from cyclic changes in pulmonary artery (PA) pressure and flow but not from the physical transmission of heartbeats onto the lungs. The aim of this study was to test this hypothesis. In 10 anesthetized pigs, COS were evaluated during expiratory breath-holds at baseline with intact chest and during open chest conditions at: (1) close contact between heart and lungs; (2) no heart-lungs contact by lifting the heart apex outside the thoracic cavity; (3) PA clamping at the main trunk during 10 s; and (4) during manual massage after cardiac arrest maintaining the heart apex outside the thorax, with and without PA clamping. Baseline COS(paw) and COS(flow) amplitude were 0.70 ± 0.08 cmH(2)O and 0.51 ± 0.06 L/min, respectively. Both COS amplitude decreased during open chest conditions in step 1 and 2 (p < 0.05). However, COS(paw) and COS(flow) amplitude did not depend on whether the heart was in contact or isolated from the surrounding lung parenchyma. COS(paw) and COS(flow) disappeared when pulmonary blood flow was stopped after clamping PA in all animals. Manual heart massages reproduced COS but they disappeared when PA was clamped during this maneuver. The transmission of PA pulsatilty across the lungs generates COS(paw) and COS(flow) measured at the airway opening. This information has potential applications for respiratory monitoring.
心源性振荡的起源,即在气道开口处记录的气道压力(COS(paw)) 和流量(COS(flow)) 信号中的小波动,仍存在争议。我们假设这些波动源自肺动脉(PA) 压力和流量的周期性变化,而不是心跳通过肺部的物理传递。本研究旨在检验这一假设。在 10 只麻醉猪中,在基线时评估了呼气暂停期间的 COS,包括:(1)胸部完整时心-肺接触;(2)通过将心脏顶点抬出胸腔来实现心-肺无接触;(3)在主干上夹闭 PA 持续 10 秒;以及(4)在心脏骤停后进行手动按摩,保持心脏顶点在胸腔外,同时夹闭和不夹闭 PA。基线时 COS(paw) 和 COS(flow) 幅度分别为 0.70 ± 0.08 cmH(2)O 和 0.51 ± 0.06 L/min。在步骤 1 和 2 中,当胸部开放时,两种 COS 幅度均降低(p < 0.05)。然而,无论心脏是否与周围肺实质接触或隔离,COS(paw) 和 COS(flow) 幅度都没有依赖关系。在所有动物中,夹闭 PA 后停止肺血流时,COS(paw) 和 COS(flow) 消失。手动心脏按摩可再现 COS,但在该操作期间夹闭 PA 时它们消失。PA 脉动穿过肺部的传递会产生在气道开口处测量的 COS(paw) 和 COS(flow)。这些信息对呼吸监测具有潜在的应用价值。