• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在存在发育不良的情况下,提交整个胆囊是没有道理的。

Submitting the entire gallbladder in cases of dysplasia is not justified.

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Baptist Hospital of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.

出版信息

Am J Clin Pathol. 2012 Sep;138(3):374-6. doi: 10.1309/AJCPB0ZTXXIF6MOF.

DOI:10.1309/AJCPB0ZTXXIF6MOF
PMID:22912353
Abstract

When dysplasia is identified in a gallbladder, many experts recommend submission of the entire gallbladder for histologic examination. We sought to determine if this practice could be justified. We reviewed 16,611 gallbladder resections over an 8-year period, and identified 17 cases of carcinoma (15 primary and 2 metastatic), 9 cases of high-grade dysplasia, 16 cases of low-grade dysplasia, and 81 cases with atypia, not otherwise specified (NOS). Sixteen (94%) of 17 adenocarcinomas were identified and sampled on the initial gross inspection, and the remaining case was identified and sampled on review of the gross specimen. None of the high- or low-grade dysplasias were identified on gross examination, but all were identified as atypical on the initial slide submitted and correctly graded with the submission of 4 additional slides. Eight (89%) of 9 high-grade, 6 (38%) of 16 low-grade, and 1 (1%) of 81 atypia, NOS, cases were subsequently entirely submitted without identification of any new lesion. We conclude that for cases of dysplasia and atypia, NOS, review of the gross specimen and submission of up to 4 additional sections identify all significant lesions, and submission of the entire gallbladder is not justified.

摘要

当胆囊中发现发育异常时,许多专家建议对整个胆囊进行组织学检查。我们试图确定这种做法是否合理。我们回顾了 8 年内进行的 16611 例胆囊切除术,发现了 17 例癌(15 例原发性和 2 例转移性)、9 例高级别发育异常、16 例低级别发育异常和 81 例非特指性不典型增生(NOS)。17 例腺癌中有 16 例(94%)在初次大体检查时被识别和取样,其余 1 例在大体标本复查时被识别和取样。高或低级别发育异常均未在大体检查中被识别,但所有病例在初次提交的切片中被识别为不典型,并在提交 4 个额外切片后正确分级。9 例高级别发育异常中有 8 例(89%)、16 例低级别发育异常中有 6 例(38%)和 81 例非特指性不典型增生(NOS)中有 1 例(1%)在未识别出新病灶的情况下全部提交。我们得出结论,对于发育异常和不典型增生(NOS)病例,审查大体标本并提交多达 4 个额外切片可以识别所有重要病变,因此不需要提交整个胆囊。

相似文献

1
Submitting the entire gallbladder in cases of dysplasia is not justified.在存在发育不良的情况下,提交整个胆囊是没有道理的。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2012 Sep;138(3):374-6. doi: 10.1309/AJCPB0ZTXXIF6MOF.
2
Caveat emptor: submitting the entire gallbladder in cases of dysplasia is not justified.买家需谨慎:在发育异常的情况下提交整个胆囊是不合理的。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2013 Jun;139(6):830. doi: 10.1309/AJCP90LNQAKHZQBQ.
3
Dysplasia in Gallbladder: What Should We Do?胆囊发育不良:我们该怎么办?
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Apr;23(4):686-689. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3955-y. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
4
Criteria for pathologic sampling of gallbladder specimens.胆囊标本病理采样标准。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2013 Aug;140(2):278-80. doi: 10.1309/AJCPUJPGQIZ6DC6A.
5
The authors' reply.
Am J Clin Pathol. 2013 Aug;140(2):280. doi: 10.1309/AJCPEY9IATHLQ9PF.
6
The authors' reply.
Am J Clin Pathol. 2013 Jun;139(6):831.
7
Cytopathology of precursor lesions of invasive carcinoma of the gallbladder: a study of bile aspirated from surgically excised gallbladders.胆囊浸润癌前体病变的细胞病理学:一项对手术切除胆囊吸出胆汁的研究。
Acta Cytol. 1982 Mar-Apr;26(2):144-52.
8
Intracholecystic papillary-tubular neoplasms (ICPN) of the gallbladder (neoplastic polyps, adenomas, and papillary neoplasms that are ≥1.0 cm): clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical analysis of 123 cases.胆囊内乳头状-管状肿瘤(ICPN)(≥1.0cm 的肿瘤性息肉、腺瘤和乳头状肿瘤):123 例临床病理和免疫组化分析。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2012 Sep;36(9):1279-301. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e318262787c.
9
Systematic Selective Sampling of Cholecystectomy Specimens Is Adequate to Detect Incidental Gallbladder Adenocarcinoma.系统选择性胆囊切除术标本采样足以检测偶然发现的胆囊腺癌。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2019 Dec;43(12):1668-1673. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001351.
10
Study of nucleolar organizer regions (NORs) in lesions of gallbladder.胆囊病变中核仁组织区(NORs)的研究。
Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2003 Jul;46(3):371-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Incidental Gallbladder Cancer on Cholecystectomy: Strategy for Re-resection of Presumed Benign Diseases from a Retrospective Multicenter Study by the Yokohama Clinical Oncology Group.胆囊切除术后偶然发现的胆囊癌:来自横滨临床肿瘤学组的回顾性多中心研究中对疑似良性疾病的再次切除策略。
In Vivo. 2021 Mar-Apr;35(2):1217-1225. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12372.
2
T2 gallbladder cancer shows substantial survival variation between continents and this is not due to histopathologic criteria or pathologic sampling differences.T2 期胆囊癌在各大洲之间存在显著的生存差异,这并非归因于组织病理学标准或病理取样差异。
Virchows Arch. 2021 May;478(5):875-884. doi: 10.1007/s00428-020-02968-5. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
3
The Contribution of Additional Sampling in Cholecystectomy Materials: A Multicenter Prospective Study.
胆囊切除术标本中追加采样的作用:一项多中心前瞻性研究。
Turk Patoloji Derg. 2020;36(3):188-194. doi: 10.5146/tjpath.2020.01483.
4
Dysplasia in Gallbladder: What Should We Do?胆囊发育不良:我们该怎么办?
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Apr;23(4):686-689. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3955-y. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
5
Distribution of dysplasia and cancer in the gallbladder: an analysis from a high cancer-risk population.胆囊异型增生和癌症的分布:高危人群的分析。
Hum Pathol. 2018 Dec;82:87-94. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2018.07.015. Epub 2018 Jul 21.
6
Impact of Type of Surgery on Survival Outcome in Patients With Early Gallbladder Cancer in the Era of Minimally Invasive Surgery: Oncologic Safety of Laparoscopic Surgery.微创手术时代早期胆囊癌患者手术方式对生存结局的影响:腹腔镜手术的肿瘤学安全性
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 May;95(22):e3675. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003675.
7
Gallbladder cancer: expert consensus statement.胆囊癌:专家共识声明。
HPB (Oxford). 2015 Aug;17(8):681-90. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12444.