Suppr超能文献

从患者选择的最新发展看第二诊疗意见。

Viewing second opinions in terms of recent developments in patient choice.

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta, Georgia, 3033, USA.

出版信息

Isr J Health Policy Res. 2012 Jul 24;1(1):31. doi: 10.1186/2045-4015-1-31.

Abstract

Patient choice has become an increasingly visible part of publicly funded health care systems. Since the 1990s, many individuals have gained the ability to select their insurer in social health insurance funded systems, while in tax-funded health systems many patients can now select their primary care and hospital providers. Second opinions about clinical procedures are part of this broad movement toward increased patient involvement in care-related decision-making. One interesting policy question will be whether the coming period of financial austerity will strengthen or weaken the role of choice as health systems seek to deal with the inevitable mismatch of demand for and supply of medical resources.

摘要

患者选择已成为公共资助医疗体系中日益明显的一部分。自 20 世纪 90 年代以来,许多人在社会健康保险资助体系中获得了选择保险公司的能力,而在税收资助的医疗体系中,许多患者现在可以选择他们的初级保健和医院提供者。关于临床程序的第二意见是这一广泛运动的一部分,旨在增加患者在护理相关决策中的参与度。一个有趣的政策问题将是,随着医疗体系试图应对医疗资源需求与供应之间不可避免的不匹配,未来的财政紧缩时期将是加强还是削弱选择的作用。

相似文献

1
Viewing second opinions in terms of recent developments in patient choice.
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2012 Jul 24;1(1):31. doi: 10.1186/2045-4015-1-31.
2
The role of insurance in the achievement of universal coverage within a developing country context: South Africa as a case study.
BMC Public Health. 2012;12 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-S1-S5. Epub 2012 Jun 22.
6
7
Government and private insurance medical programs as well as MDVIP, an update.
J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2004;14(3):243-50. doi: 10.1615/jlongtermeffmedimplants.v14.i3.80.
10
Home care for older people in Sweden: a universal model in transition.
Health Soc Care Community. 2012 May;20(3):300-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2011.01046.x. Epub 2011 Dec 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Seeking a second medical opinion: composition, reasons and perceived outcomes in Israel.
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2017 Dec 8;6(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s13584-017-0191-y.

本文引用的文献

1
From shared decision making to patient-centered decision making.
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2012 Jan 30;1(1):6. doi: 10.1186/2045-4015-1-6.
3
Denmark health system review.
Health Syst Transit. 2012;14(2):i-xxii, 1-192.
4
United Kingdom (England): Health system review.
Health Syst Transit. 2011;13(1):1-483, xix-xx.
5
Effects of purchaser competition in the Dutch health system: is the glass half full or half empty?
Health Econ Policy Law. 2011 Jan;6(1):109-23. doi: 10.1017/S1744133110000381.
7
Patient reactions to hospital choice in Norway, Denmark, and Sweden.
Health Econ Policy Law. 2007 Apr;2(Pt 2):125-52. doi: 10.1017/S174413310700401X.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验