Vrangbaek Karsten, Østergren Katarina, Birk Hans Okkels, Winblad Ulrika
University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Health Econ Policy Law. 2007 Apr;2(Pt 2):125-52. doi: 10.1017/S174413310700401X.
This article is a comparative study of three Scandinavian countries--Norway, Denmark, and Sweden--all of which have provided the individual patient with extensive rights to choose the hospital where he/she wishes to receive treatment. In the paper, we present an analysis of the utilization of the opportunity to choose between hospitals in these three countries. The analysis addresses two questions: (i) How many patients are exercising the right to choose between hospitals in these countries and who is making use of this opportunity? (ii) How can we explain the observed utilization pattern? The results of the study reveal clear similarities between the three countries and suggest that few patients have actually chosen their hospital. However, a gradual increase can be observed over the years. Few formal, legislative, or economic barriers exist for patients. Instead, limited knowledge amongst patients regarding reforms, combined with insufficient support from GPs and limited information, can explain why few patients choose to receive care outside of their local region.
本文是对三个斯堪的纳维亚国家——挪威、丹麦和瑞典——的比较研究,这三个国家都赋予了患者广泛的权利,使其能够选择自己希望接受治疗的医院。在本文中,我们对这三个国家中患者利用医院选择权的情况进行了分析。该分析涉及两个问题:(i)在这些国家中有多少患者行使了选择医院的权利,以及谁在利用这一机会?(ii)我们如何解释观察到的利用模式?研究结果显示这三个国家之间存在明显的相似之处,表明实际上很少有患者选择医院。然而,多年来可以观察到一种逐渐上升的趋势。对患者来说几乎不存在正式、立法或经济上的障碍。相反,患者对改革的了解有限,再加上全科医生的支持不足以及信息有限,这可以解释为什么很少有患者选择在当地地区以外接受治疗。