The Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois (Dr Baig, Ms Locklin, Ms Wilkes, Dr Gorawara-Bhat, Dr Quinn, Dr Burnet, Dr Chin)
Advocate Healthcare Parish Nursing, Park Ridge, Illinois (Ms Oborski)
Diabetes Educ. 2012 Sep-Oct;38(5):733-41. doi: 10.1177/0145721712455700. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
To assess Latino adults' preferences for peer-based diabetes self-management interventions and the acceptability of the church setting for these interventions.
The authors partnered with 2 predominantly Mexican American churches in Chicago and conducted 6 focus groups with 37 adults who had diabetes or had a family member with diabetes. They assessed participant preferences regarding group education and telephone-based one-to-one peer diabetes self-management interventions. Systematic qualitative methods were used to identify the types of programming preferred by participants in the church setting.
Participants had a mean (SD) age of 53 (11) years. All participants were Latino, and more than half were born in Mexico (60%). Most participants were female (78%), had finished high school (65%), and had health insurance (57%). Sixty-five percent reported having a diagnosis of diabetes. Many participants believed the group-based and telephone-based one-to-one peer support programs could provide opportunities to share diabetes knowledge. Yet, the majority stated the group education model would offer more opportunity for social interaction and access to people with a range of diabetes experience. Participants noted many concerns regarding the one-to-one intervention, mostly involving the impersonal nature of telephone calls and the inability to form a trusting bond with the telephone partner. However, the telephone-based intervention could be a supplement to the group educational sessions. Participants also stated the church would be a familiar and trusted setting for peer-based diabetes interventions.
Church-based Latinos with diabetes and their family members were interested in peer-based diabetes self-management interventions; however, they preferred group-based to telephone-based one-to-one peer programs.
评估拉丁裔成年人对基于同伴的糖尿病自我管理干预的偏好,以及教会环境对这些干预措施的可接受性。
作者与芝加哥的 2 家主要以墨西哥裔美国人为主的教会合作,对 37 名患有糖尿病或有糖尿病家庭成员的成年人进行了 6 次焦点小组讨论。他们评估了参与者对团体教育和基于电话的一对一同伴糖尿病自我管理干预的偏好。采用系统的定性方法确定参与者在教会环境中偏好的编程类型。
参与者的平均(SD)年龄为 53(11)岁。所有参与者均为拉丁裔,超过一半(60%)出生于墨西哥。大多数参与者为女性(78%),完成了高中学业(65%),并拥有医疗保险(57%)。65%的人报告有糖尿病诊断。许多参与者认为基于团体和基于电话的一对一同伴支持计划可以提供分享糖尿病知识的机会。然而,大多数人表示团体教育模式将提供更多的社交互动机会,并能够接触到具有不同糖尿病经验的人。参与者指出了许多对一对一干预的担忧,主要涉及电话通话的非个人性质,以及无法与电话伙伴建立信任关系。然而,基于电话的干预可以作为团体教育课程的补充。参与者还表示,教会将是基于同伴的糖尿病干预的熟悉和可信赖的环境。
教会背景下的拉丁裔糖尿病患者及其家属对基于同伴的糖尿病自我管理干预感兴趣,但他们更喜欢基于团体的干预,而不是基于电话的一对一同伴项目。