Department of Anesthesia, Clinical Sciences Institute, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2012 Oct;25(5):610-4. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e328357b165.
Since the publication of original work on the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block, the translation of the research into clinical practice has resulted in some 146 articles being published in peer-reviewed journals. However, there continues to be controversies over the best approach to be used. The introduction of ultrasound should have aided the development of this block, but in fact it has caused more questions to be asked. There are a number of reviews of the block already published, but were they published too early and what is our current understanding of the TAP block and its mechanisms of action?
The TAP block continues to develop. We now understand that the TAP block is a multifaceted block, working with both localized field effects as well as distal effects due to a distant spread of local anesthetic. Recent research would suggest that the location of needle tip placement causes variation in the block characteristics obtained. The more anterior approaches adopted for use since the introduction of ultrasound might be better described as RAFI (regional abdominal field infiltration) blocks.
The TAP block, in all its guises, is an effective analgesic tool, but what is the best approach? Randomized controlled trials comparing the TAP/RAFI blocks to epidural based analgesia are required.
自腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞的原始研究发表以来,将该研究转化为临床实践已在同行评议期刊上发表了约 146 篇文章。然而,对于最佳的应用方法仍存在争议。超声的引入本应有助于该阻滞的发展,但实际上却引发了更多的问题。目前已经有许多关于该阻滞的综述,但它们是否发表得过早,以及我们目前对 TAP 阻滞及其作用机制的理解如何?
TAP 阻滞仍在不断发展。我们现在知道 TAP 阻滞是一种多方面的阻滞,既具有局部场效应,也具有由于局部麻醉的远距离扩散而产生的远端效应。最近的研究表明,针尖放置的位置会导致获得的阻滞特征发生变化。自超声引入以来,采用的更靠前的进针方法可能更好地描述为 RAFI(腹部区域浸润)阻滞。
TAP 阻滞以各种形式存在,是一种有效的镇痛工具,但哪种方法最好?需要进行随机对照试验,比较 TAP/RAFI 阻滞与硬膜外镇痛的效果。