• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

How should we use the visual analogue scale (VAS) in rehabilitation outcomes? I: How much of what? The seductive VAS numbers are not true measures.

作者信息

Franchignoni Franco, Salaffi Fausto, Tesio Luigi

机构信息

Salvatore Maugeri Foundation, IRCCS, Scientific Institute of Genova Nervi, Veruno (NO), Italy.

出版信息

J Rehabil Med. 2012 Sep;44(9):798-9; discussion 803-4. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1030.

DOI:10.2340/16501977-1030
PMID:22915046
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
How should we use the visual analogue scale (VAS) in rehabilitation outcomes? I: How much of what? The seductive VAS numbers are not true measures.我们应如何在康复结果中使用视觉模拟量表（VAS）？I：针对什么的多少？诱人的VAS数字并非真实的测量指标。
J Rehabil Med. 2012 Sep;44(9):798-9; discussion 803-4. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1030.
2
How should we use the visual analogue scale (VAS) in rehabilitation outcomes? III: On the validation requirements for assessments using VAS with ratio properties.我们应如何在康复结果中使用视觉模拟量表（VAS）？III：关于使用具有比率属性的VAS进行评估的验证要求。
J Rehabil Med. 2012 Sep;44(9):801-2; discussion 803-4. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1032.
3
The use of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in rehabilitation outcomes.视觉模拟量表（VAS）在康复结局评估中的应用。
J Rehabil Med. 2012 Jun;44(7):609-10. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0999.
4
How should we use the visual analogue scale (VAS) in rehabilitation outcomes? II: Visual analogue scales as ratio scales: an alternative to the view of Kersten et al.我们应如何在康复结果中使用视觉模拟量表（VAS）？II：作为比率量表的视觉模拟量表：对Kersten等人观点的一种替代
J Rehabil Med. 2012 Sep;44(9):800-1; discussion 803-4. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1031.
5
Is there a case for using visual analogue scale valuations in cost-utility analysis?在成本效用分析中使用视觉模拟量表评估是否有依据？
Health Econ. 2006 Jul;15(7):653-64. doi: 10.1002/hec.1086.
6
[Acceptance and understandability of various methods of health valuations for the chronically ill: willingness to pay, visual analogue scale and rating scale].
Gesundheitswesen. 2009 Nov;71(11):e1-10. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1231050. Epub 2009 Jul 20.
7
Minimally important difference for patient-reported outcomes in psoriatic arthritis: Health Assessment Questionnaire and pain, fatigue, and global visual analog scales.在银屑病关节炎患者报告结局中最小有意义差异：健康评估问卷和疼痛、疲劳和整体视觉模拟量表。
J Rheumatol. 2010 May;37(5):1024-8. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.090832. Epub 2010 Mar 15.
8
Responsiveness of pain scales: a comparison of three pain intensity measures in chiropractic patients.疼痛量表的反应性：脊椎按摩治疗患者中三种疼痛强度测量方法的比较
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1998 Jan;21(1):1-7.
9
Lack of interchangeability between visual analogue and verbal rating pain scales: a cross sectional description of pain etiology groups.视觉模拟评分法与言语疼痛评分量表之间缺乏互换性：疼痛病因组的横断面描述
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005 Oct 4;5:31. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-5-31.
10
[Pain in rheumatoid arthritis measured with the visual analogue scale and the Dutch version of the McGill Pain Questionnaire].[采用视觉模拟评分法和荷兰版麦吉尔疼痛问卷测量类风湿性关节炎疼痛]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1992 Jun 13;136(24):1166-70.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the HAL® lumbar type exoskeleton in long-term care: protocol for a mixed-methods feasibility study.长期护理中HAL®腰椎型外骨骼的评估：一项混合方法可行性研究方案
Front Digit Health. 2025 Aug 18;7:1591866. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1591866. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparison between Magneto-Dynamic, Piezoelectric, and Conventional Surgery for Dental Extractions: A Pilot Study.磁动力、压电与传统拔牙手术的比较：一项初步研究
Dent J (Basel). 2023 Feb 23;11(3):60. doi: 10.3390/dj11030060.
3
Why Questionnaire Scores Are Not Measures: A Question-Raising Article.
为什么问卷分数不是测量工具：一篇引发问题的文章。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Jan 1;102(1):75-82. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002028. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
4
Core outcome measurement instruments for clinical trials in nonspecific low back pain.非特异性下腰痛临床试验的核心结局测量工具。
Pain. 2018 Mar;159(3):481-495. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001117.
5
Study on the consistency of doctor-report outcomes and patient-report outcomes in symptoms of traditional Chinese Medicine: a small sample size trial in diabetics.中医症状中医生报告结局与患者报告结局的一致性研究：糖尿病患者的小样本试验
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 May 15;8(5):8000-4. eCollection 2015.
6
Preliminary development and validation of a new end-of-life patient-reported outcome measure assessing the ability of patients to finalise their affairs at the end of life.一种新的临终患者报告结局量表的初步开发与验证，该量表用于评估患者在临终时完成身后事务的能力。
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 15;9(4):e94316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094316. eCollection 2014.
7
Searching for optimal rating scales in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI).在 Bath 强直性脊柱炎功能指数（BASFI）和 Bath 强直性脊柱炎疾病活动度指数（BASDAI）中寻找最佳评分量表。
Rheumatol Int. 2014 Feb;34(2):171-3. doi: 10.1007/s00296-013-2891-0. Epub 2013 Nov 9.