Institute of Neurobiology, University of Ulm, Ulm D-89069, Germany.
J Exp Biol. 2012 Sep 15;215(Pt 18):3218-22. doi: 10.1242/jeb.071761.
When finding more food than one is able to carry home, should one come back to the site to exploit it further? This question is crucial for central place foragers that provide for a home place with brood or nest mates. The benefit of returning has to be weighed against the chance of finding food elsewhere and the resources available. Desert ants Cataglyphis fortis are well-studied examples when it comes to navigating back and forth between their nest and a foraging area, due to their primary reliance on path integration in the open and featureless desert habitat. The ants use path integration not only for a safe return from their foraging trips but also for future returns to plentiful feeding sites. The direction from the nest that has previously yielded food items is preferred for future foraging trips, a phenomenon termed sector fidelity. What prompts the ants to return to a particular site, and how faithfully they search for that place, has not been well studied. We examine the evaluation of food sources in channel experiments by varying both the number of food items in a feeder and the number of visits to the feeder before testing search distances of foragers returning to the feeding site. Ants exhibited more focused searches for plentiful food sources than for sources with only few food items upon their first return visit. After several successful visits, the ants always searched thoroughly for the food source, independent of the amount of food offered. Thus, desert ants consider both food abundance and reliability of food encounter, with corroborative learning of reliability gradually overriding the initial preference for plentiful feeders. The density of food items appears to be used by the ants as a proxy for food abundance. On the level of our analysis, the searches performed in the experimental channels are indistinguishable from those performed in the open desert terrain. The present results not only demonstrate how otherwise well-studied desert ants assess yield and experience with reliability of food sources, but also establish a model system for future study of how itemised food sources are exploited.
当发现的食物超过一个人能够带回家的量时,是否应该回到原地进一步利用?这个问题对提供巢穴或巢伴食物的中心觅食者来说至关重要。返回的好处必须与在其他地方找到食物的机会和可用资源相权衡。当涉及到在它们的巢穴和觅食区之间来回导航时,沙漠蚂蚁 Cataglyphis fortis 是一个很好的研究案例,因为它们主要依赖于在开阔且无特征的沙漠栖息地中的路径整合。蚂蚁不仅使用路径整合来安全返回觅食之旅,还用于未来返回丰富的觅食地点。它们更喜欢以前有食物的巢穴方向进行未来的觅食之旅,这种现象称为扇区忠诚度。是什么促使蚂蚁回到一个特定的地点,以及它们如何忠实地寻找那个地方,这还没有得到很好的研究。我们通过改变喂食器中食物的数量和测试觅食者返回喂食地点的搜索距离之前的访问次数,在通道实验中检查食物来源的评估。蚂蚁在第一次返回访问时,对丰富的食物来源表现出更集中的搜索,而不是对只有少量食物的来源进行搜索。在几次成功访问后,蚂蚁总是会彻底搜索食物来源,而不受提供的食物量的影响。因此,沙漠蚂蚁会考虑食物的丰富度和食物遭遇的可靠性,随着可靠性的协同学习逐渐取代对丰富饲料的初始偏好。食物的密度似乎被蚂蚁用作食物丰富度的替代指标。在我们的分析层面上,实验通道中的搜索与在开阔的沙漠地形中进行的搜索无法区分。这些结果不仅证明了即使是研究得很好的沙漠蚂蚁如何评估食物来源的产量和经验可靠性,还为未来研究如何利用分类食物来源建立了一个模型系统。