• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

牙买加社会经济阶层之间公共和私人医疗保健利用的差异。

Public and private health care utilization differences between socioeconomic strata in Jamaica.

作者信息

Bourne Paul A, Eldemire-Shearer Denise, Paul Tomlin J, Lagrenade Janet, Charles Christopher Ad

机构信息

Department of Community Health and Psychiatry, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of the West Indies, Mona, Kingston, Jamaica;

出版信息

Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2010 Jul;1:81-91. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S11868. Epub 2010 Sep 1.

DOI:10.2147/PROM.S11868
PMID:22915955
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3417901/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess trends in the use of private and public health care services among Jamaicans over a 15-year period (1991-2007).

DESIGN AND METHODS

Statistics on the use of health care services were taken from the Jamaica Survey of Living Conditions (JSLC) for the 15-year period 1993 to 2007. Use of hospital services were represented in income quintiles and compared for private and public facilities. The difference in percentage use between public and private was compared by quintiles over the period and the variability in those differentials assessed.

RESULTS

This study highlights the increasing use of private services by increasing wealth, exaggerated for the wealthiest quintile. There is a widening of the differences in utilization between public and private centers as income level increases (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Internal and external economic conditions influence the use of private and public health care services in Jamaica. Although the relative increase in the cost (to the user) of public health care is more than that for private health care, the actual cost to use the public health care system is still significantly cheaper than using the private system. Lower income health care users tend to take the lesser cost option.

摘要

目的

评估牙买加人在15年期间(1991 - 2007年)使用私立和公立医疗服务的趋势。

设计与方法

1993年至2007年这15年期间的医疗服务使用统计数据取自牙买加生活条件调查(JSLC)。医院服务的使用情况按收入五分位数呈现,并对私立和公立机构进行比较。在这一期间,按五分位数比较公立和私立机构使用百分比的差异,并评估这些差异的变异性。

结果

本研究突出显示,随着财富增加,私立服务的使用也在增加,这在最富有的五分位数人群中表现得更为明显。随着收入水平的提高,公立和私立医疗中心的利用率差异不断扩大(P < 0.001)。

结论

内部和外部经济状况影响牙买加私立和公立医疗服务的使用。虽然公立医疗服务(对使用者而言)成本的相对增幅大于私立医疗服务,但使用公立医疗系统的实际成本仍明显低于使用私立系统。低收入的医疗服务使用者往往选择成本较低的选项。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab02/3417901/7192b17666b8/prom-1-081f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab02/3417901/764995bce9c2/prom-1-081f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab02/3417901/b62348a77247/prom-1-081f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab02/3417901/0819ae55a525/prom-1-081f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab02/3417901/7192b17666b8/prom-1-081f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab02/3417901/764995bce9c2/prom-1-081f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab02/3417901/b62348a77247/prom-1-081f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab02/3417901/0819ae55a525/prom-1-081f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab02/3417901/7192b17666b8/prom-1-081f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Public and private health care utilization differences between socioeconomic strata in Jamaica.牙买加社会经济阶层之间公共和私人医疗保健利用的差异。
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2010 Jul;1:81-91. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S11868. Epub 2010 Sep 1.
2
User-fee-removal improves equity of children's health care utilization and reduces families' financial burden: evidence from Jamaica.取消用户费用可提高儿童医疗保健利用的公平性并减轻家庭的经济负担:来自牙买加的证据。
J Glob Health. 2017 Jun;7(1):010502. doi: 10.7189/jogh.07.010502.
3
Maternal health care utilization in Jordan: a study of patterns and determinants.约旦的孕产妇保健服务利用情况:模式与决定因素研究
Stud Fam Plann. 1991 May-Jun;22(3):177-87.
4
Price and income elasticities of demand for modern health care: the case of infant delivery in the Philippines.现代医疗保健需求的价格和收入弹性:以菲律宾的婴儿分娩为例。
World Bank Econ Rev. 1988 Jan;2(1):49-76. doi: 10.1093/wber/2.1.49.
5
Use of family planning and child health services in the private sector: an equity analysis of 12 DHS surveys.私营部门计划生育和儿童保健服务的利用:对 12 次 DHS 调查的公平性分析。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Apr 24;17(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0763-7.
6
Utilization and expenditure at public and private facilities in 39 low-income countries.39 个低收入国家的公立和私立机构的使用和支出。
Trop Med Int Health. 2012 Jan;17(1):23-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2011.02894.x. Epub 2011 Oct 18.
7
Cost of hospitalization for childbirth in India: how equitable it is in the post-NRHM era?印度分娩住院费用:在后国家农村卫生使命时代有多公平?
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Aug 15;10(1):409. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2729-z.
8
Health disparities and the social context of health disparity between the poorest and wealthiest quintiles in a developing country.发展中国家最贫困和最富裕五分之一人口之间的健康差距以及健康差距的社会背景。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2011 May;22(2):532-48. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2011.0055.
9
Effectiveness of government strategies for financial protection against costs of hospitalization Care in India.政府应对住院费用财务保障策略在印度的效果。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Apr 16;18(1):501. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5431-8.
10
Quality of care in public and private primary health care facilities: structural comparisons in Jamaica.牙买加公共和私立初级卫生保健机构的医疗服务质量:结构比较
Bull Pan Am Health Organ. 1994 Jun;28(2):122-41.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Analysis of Healthcare Quality Between the University Hospital of the West Indies and Public Hospitals in Jamaica.西印度群岛大学医院与牙买加公立医院医疗质量的比较分析
Cureus. 2024 Nov 11;16(11):e73423. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73423. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Determinants of isoniazid preventive therapy completion among people living with HIV attending care and treatment clinics from 2013 to 2017 in Dar es Salaam Region, Tanzania. A cross-sectional analytical study.坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆地区 2013 年至 2017 年间,接受护理和治疗诊所服务的艾滋病毒感染者中异烟肼预防性治疗完成情况的决定因素。一项横断面分析研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Apr 10;20(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-04997-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative effectiveness research: making it work for those we serve.比较效果研究:使其为我们所服务的对象发挥作用。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2009 Jul;36(3):283-4. doi: 10.1007/s11414-009-9178-y. Epub 2009 Apr 24.
2
Health amid a financial crisis: a complex diagnosis.金融危机下的健康状况:一项复杂的诊断。
Bull World Health Organ. 2009 Jan;87(1):4-5. doi: 10.2471/blt.09.010109.
3
Socioeconomic patterns in the use of public and private health services and equity in health care.公共和私人卫生服务利用中的社会经济模式与医疗保健公平性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Sep 14;8:183. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-183.
4
Horizontal inequities in Australia's mixed public/private health care system.澳大利亚公共/私人混合医疗体系中的横向不平等现象。
Health Policy. 2008 Apr;86(1):97-108. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.09.018. Epub 2007 Nov 14.
5
Poverty and access to health care in developing countries.发展中国家的贫困与医疗保健服务可及性
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1136:161-71. doi: 10.1196/annals.1425.011. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
6
Public versus private health care in a national health service.国家医疗服务体系中的公共医疗与私人医疗
Health Econ. 2007 Jun;16(6):579-601. doi: 10.1002/hec.1185.
7
Ethics in public health research: a research protocol to evaluate the effectiveness of public-private partnerships as a means to improve health and welfare systems worldwide.公共卫生研究中的伦理:一项评估公私伙伴关系作为改善全球卫生和福利系统手段的有效性的研究方案。
Am J Public Health. 2007 Jan;97(1):19-25. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.075614. Epub 2006 Nov 30.
8
Does federal health care policy influence switching between the public and private sectors in individuals?联邦医疗保健政策会影响个人在公共部门和私营部门之间的转换吗?
Health Policy. 2006 Dec;79(2-3):284-95. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.01.011. Epub 2006 Feb 28.
9
What do we know about men's help-seeking and health service use?我们对男性寻求帮助及使用医疗服务的情况了解多少?
Med J Aust. 2006 Jan 16;184(2):81-3. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00124.x.
10
Should Canadian physicians support parallel private health care?加拿大医生应该支持并行的私人医疗保健吗?
CMAJ. 2005 Oct 11;173(8):901-2. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.051137.