Welle Jennifer, Fort John, Crawley Joseph, Cryer Byron, Dickerhoof Rene, Turner Michelle P, Miller Kimberly L
ICON Clinical Research, The Embarcadero, San Francisco, CA, USA;
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2011 Jul;2:135-43. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S18077. Epub 2011 Jun 23.
This study evaluated the electronically administered modified Severity of Dyspepsia Assessment (mSODA) pain scale, a six-item measure of upper abdominal pain intensity, for daily use in osteoarthritis patients taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.
Once the mSODA pain scale was isolated, cognitive debriefing interviews (n = 30) were used to examine its appropriateness in the target population. Following administration of the instrument in two Phase III pivotal trials, the data were analyzed to examine reliability, validity, responsiveness, and the minimal important difference.
Using a subset of trial data (n = 90 patients), the mSODA pain scale proved to be a unidimensional, highly internally consistent instrument (α = 0.93) with good test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.77). Construct validity was established via moderate correlations with other similar patient-reported outcomes. Additionally, known-groups validity demonstrated that the mSODA pain scale could distinguish between subjects who did and did not report gastrointestinal symptoms and antacid use (both P values ≤ 0.05). The mSODA pain scale was also responsive to change in heartburn at weeks 6 and 12 (Guyatt's statistic = 1.7 and 2.6, respectively), and the minimal important difference obtained via ½ SD was 5.7 (range 2-47).
This research suggests that the mSODA pain scale is both feasible and valid for assessing dyspepsia in patients taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for relief of symptoms of osteoarthritis.
本研究评估了电子管理的改良消化不良严重程度评估(mSODA)疼痛量表,这是一种用于测量上腹部疼痛强度的六项指标量表,用于日常服用非甾体抗炎药的骨关节炎患者。
确定mSODA疼痛量表后,采用认知性深入访谈(n = 30)来检验其在目标人群中的适用性。在两项III期关键试验中使用该量表后,对数据进行分析以检验其信度、效度、反应度和最小重要差异。
使用试验数据的一个子集(n = 90例患者),mSODA疼痛量表被证明是一个单维度、内部一致性高的量表(α = 0.93),具有良好的重测信度(组内相关系数0.77)。通过与其他类似的患者报告结局的中度相关性建立了结构效度。此外,已知组效度表明,mSODA疼痛量表能够区分报告和未报告胃肠道症状及使用抗酸剂的受试者(P值均≤0.05)。mSODA疼痛量表对第6周和第12周烧心症状的变化也有反应(分别为Guyatt统计量= 1.7和2.6),通过½标准差获得的最小重要差异为5.7(范围2 - 47)。
本研究表明,mSODA疼痛量表对于评估服用非甾体抗炎药缓解骨关节炎症状的患者的消化不良是可行且有效的。