• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临终与患者自主权的首字母缩略词。

Acronyms of dying versus patient autonomy.

作者信息

Salkić Amina, Zwick Anna

机构信息

Institute for German, European and International Medical Law, Public Health Law and Bioethics of the Universities of Heidelberg and Mannheim (IMGB), Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Health Law. 2012 Jun;19(3):289-303. doi: 10.1163/157180912x639143.

DOI:10.1163/157180912x639143
PMID:22916535
Abstract

In medical practice in Germany and several other countries abbreviated orders linked to end-of-life decisions, such as DNR (do not resuscitate), are increasingly used. In order to investigate their legal status, this article gives an overview of the recently passed German law, which regulates the process of end-of-life decision-making and the use of living wills, giving primacy to patient autonomy. Concerning the risk of misinterpretation of acronyms, the article describes the impacts of such orders on patient autonomy and safety and suggests a clear systematic classification of the different DNR orders in order to investigate their legal status under the German law. Their general binding force is to be acknowledged, depending on its origination and the fulfilment of certain requirements.

摘要

在德国和其他几个国家的医疗实践中,与临终决定相关的缩写医嘱,如“不要复苏”(DNR),正越来越多地被使用。为了调查它们的法律地位,本文概述了最近通过的德国法律,该法律规范了临终决策过程和生前遗嘱的使用,将患者自主权置于首位。关于首字母缩略词被误解的风险,本文描述了此类医嘱对患者自主权和安全的影响,并建议对不同的“不要复苏”医嘱进行明确的系统分类,以便根据德国法律调查它们的法律地位。根据其来源和某些要求的履行情况,应承认它们的一般约束力。

相似文献

1
Acronyms of dying versus patient autonomy.临终与患者自主权的首字母缩略词。
Eur J Health Law. 2012 Jun;19(3):289-303. doi: 10.1163/157180912x639143.
2
[Do-not-resuscitate orders--ethical and legal considerations].[不要复苏医嘱——伦理和法律考量]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2007 Mar 26;169(13):1201-4.
3
A new law on advance directives in Germany.德国的一项新的预先指示法。
J Med Ethics. 2010 Dec;36(12):779-83. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.036376.
4
[Patient autonomy at the end of life: "law regarding advance directives" confirms the previously assumed legal status].[临终时的患者自主权:“关于预立医疗指示的法律”确认了先前假定的法律地位]
Kinderkrankenschwester. 2009 Sep;28(9):368-9.
5
Unilateral withholding and withdrawal of potentially life-sustaining treatment: a violation of dignity under the law in Canada.单方面拒绝和撤掉可能维持生命的治疗:违反加拿大法律规定的尊严。
J Palliat Care. 2004 Autumn;20(3):143-9.
6
Legal issues in end-of-life care in Oklahoma.俄克拉荷马州临终关怀中的法律问题。
Oklahoma City Univ Law Rev. 2002 Fall;27(3):921-37.
7
Medical treatment of dementia patients at the end of life: can the law accommodate the personal identity and welfare problems?痴呆症患者临终时的医疗救治:法律能否兼顾个人身份及福利问题?
Eur J Health Law. 2006 Sep;13(3):219-34. doi: 10.1163/157180906778852411.
8
Do-not-resuscitate orders.不要复苏医嘱。
J Fla Med Assoc. 1994 Jan;81(1):30-4.
9
Inapplicability of advance directives in a paternalistic setting: the case of a post-communist health system.在家长式医疗环境下,预立医疗指示不适用:后共产主义卫生系统的案例。
BMC Med Ethics. 2011 Jun 15;12:12. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-12-12.
10
Advance directives and life-sustaining treatment: a legal primer.预立医疗指示与维持生命治疗:法律入门
Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2002 Dec;16(6):1381-96. doi: 10.1016/s0889-8588(02)00058-8.