Clinical Neurophysiology, MIRA-Institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine, University of Twente, The Netherlands.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2013 Feb;124(2):228-37. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2012.07.007. Epub 2012 Aug 20.
Visual interpretation of EEG is time-consuming and not always consistent between reviewers. Our objective is to improve this by introducing guidelines and algorithms to quantify various properties, focussing on the background pattern in adult EEGs.
Five common properties were evaluated: (i) alpha rhythm frequency; (ii) reactivity; (iii) anterio-posterior gradients; (iv) asymmetries; and (v) diffuse slow-wave activity. A formal description was found for each together with a guideline and proposed quantitative algorithm. All five features were automatically extracted from routine EEG recordings. Modified time-frequency plots were calculated to summarize spectral and spatial characteristics. Visual analysis scores were obtained from diagnostic reports.
Automated feature extraction was applied to 384 routine EEGs. Inter-rater agreement was calculated between visual and quantitative analysis using Fleiss' kappa: κ={(i)0.60;(ii)0.35;(iii)0.19;(iv)0.12;(v)0.76}. The method is further illustrated with three representative examples of automated reports.
Automated feature extraction of several background EEG properties seems feasible. Inter-rater agreement differed between various features, ranging from slight to substantial. This may be related to the nature of various guidelines and inconsistencies in visual interpretation.
Formal descriptions, standardized terminology, and quantitative analysis may improve inter-rater reliability in reporting of the EEG background pattern and contribute to more efficient and consistent interpretations.
脑电图的视觉解读既耗时,不同评估者之间的结果也不尽一致。我们的目标是通过引入量化各种特性的指南和算法来改善这一情况,重点关注成人脑电图的背景模式。
评估了五种常见特性:(i)α节律频率;(ii)反应性;(iii)前后梯度;(iv)不对称性;以及(v)弥漫性慢波活动。为每个特性都找到了一个正式的描述,以及一个指南和建议的定量算法。所有五个特征都从常规脑电图记录中自动提取。计算了修改后的时频图以总结频谱和空间特征。从诊断报告中获得了视觉分析评分。
自动化特征提取应用于 384 例常规脑电图。使用 Fleiss' kappa 计算视觉和定量分析之间的组内一致性:κ={(i)0.60;(ii)0.35;(iii)0.19;(iv)0.12;(v)0.76}。该方法通过三个自动化报告的代表性示例进一步说明。
对几种背景 EEG 特性进行自动化特征提取似乎是可行的。不同特征之间的组内一致性存在差异,从轻微到显著不等。这可能与各种指南的性质和视觉解释的不一致有关。
正式的描述、标准化的术语和定量分析可以提高报告脑电图背景模式的评估者间可靠性,并有助于更高效和一致的解释。