Colas G, Lefèbvre J, Guérin Y
INRA, station de physiologie de la reproduction, Nouzilly, France.
Reprod Nutr Dev. 1990;30(5):589-603.
An experiment was conducted on the Ile-de-France (IF) breed to determine if the more or less important sensitivity of the ram to photoperiodism came under genetic control. Five base breed unrelated rams (greater than or equal to 4 yr old), were chosen for this study: 2 good (I and II), 2 bad (III and IV), and an intermediate sire (V). Ram I, which died a few years before the experiment began, was selected on both the low amplitude of its sperm production during a 6-month period of artificial lighting and the very high fertilizing capacity of its sperm in spring. Rams II to V were controlled for 12 (percentage of morphologically abnormal spermatozoa, AM) or 14 (maximum antero-posterior scrotal diameter of both testes, DT) consecutive months. Following this period of control, seasonal variation in rams was assessed as follows: low (ram II), high (rams III and IV) and intermediate (ram V) seasonal variation rams. Breeding (artificial insemination) of these 5 rams to IF ewes resulted in 18 male offspring born in February and distributed as follows: rams I to III: 4 male offspring/ram (families 1 to 3, F1 to F3), rams IV and V: 3 male offspring/ram (families 4 and 5, F4 and F5). The 18 animals were controlled once a week (DT and AM) from 8, 5 to 46 months of age (7 periods, P1 to P7). Regarding DT, mean DT was higher in F1 and F2 than those of the whole population (WP) (represented by a discontinuous line of ordinate 5.0 in Graph 3), but F2 was closer to this population than F1. On the other hand, they were lower in the rams of F3 and F4. Differences between F3 or F4 and WP were lower in autumn than in spring. All families showed significant differences during the experimental periods except at P7 for pairs 3-5 and 4-5. Distances between F1, F2, F3 were always different (P less than 0.01 or P less than 0.001), whatever the size of the population (n = 3 or 4). Weekly F5 values varied in an opposite way to those of F3 and F4: increase in spring and decrease in autumn. Regarding AM, families did not differ as much as in DT (graph 4). Weekly variations in AM were also stronger. However, mean AM was almost always lower in F1 males and somewhat higher in F3 males to that of WP.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
在法兰西岛(IF)品种的公羊上进行了一项实验,以确定公羊对光周期的敏感程度或多或少是否受遗传控制。本研究选择了5只无亲缘关系的基础品种公羊(年龄大于或等于4岁):2只优良公羊(I和II)、2只不良公羊(III和IV)以及1只中等水平的种公羊(V)。公羊I在实验开始前几年死亡,它是根据其在6个月人工光照期间精子产量的低幅度以及春季精子的高受精能力挑选出来的。公羊II至V连续12个月(形态异常精子百分比,AM)或14个月(双侧睾丸最大前后阴囊直径,DT)接受监测。在这段监测期之后,对公羊的季节性变化进行了如下评估:季节性变化低(公羊II)、高(公羊III和IV)和中等(公羊V)的公羊。将这5只公羊与IF母羊进行配种(人工授精),结果在2月产下了18只雄性后代,分布如下:公羊I至III:每只公羊4只雄性后代(家系1至3,F1至F3),公羊IV和V:每只公羊3只雄性后代(家系4和5,F4和F5)。这18只动物在8.5至46月龄期间(7个时间段,P1至P7)每周接受一次监测(DT和AM)。关于DT,F1和F2的平均DT高于整个群体(WP)(在图3中由纵坐标为5.0的不连续线表示),但F2比F1更接近该群体。另一方面,F3和F4的公羊的DT较低。F3或F4与WP之间的差异在秋季比春季小。除了在P7时3 - 5对和4 - 5对之外,所有家系在实验期间都表现出显著差异。无论群体大小(n = 3或4),F1、F2、F3之间的差异总是不同的(P小于0.01或P小于0.001)。F5的每周值变化方式与F3和F4相反:春季增加,秋季减少。关于AM,各家族之间的差异不如DT那么大(图4)。AM的每周变化也更强。然而,F1雄性的平均AM几乎总是低于WP,而F3雄性的平均AM则略高于WP。(摘要截取自400字)