Avinash A, Grover S D, Koul M, Nayak M T, Singhvi A, Singh R K
Department of Paedodontics & Preventive Dentistry, Rungta College of Dental Sciences and Reaearch, Bhilai (C.G), India.
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2012 Apr-Jun;30(2):115-21. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.99982.
Mechanical method of caries removal is associated with the removal of sound tooth structure, production of pain, heat, annoying sounds, and vibrations. Chemomechanical caries removal method is based on removal of only carious dentin leaving sound dentin intact.
The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of mechanical and chemomechanical methods of caries removal in deciduous and permanent teeth.
A total of 30 carious teeth including 15 deciduous and 15 permanent teeth having dentinal caries selected randomly and cut into two halves through center of the lesion, were subjected to caries removal by mechanical (Group A), and chemomechanical methods (Group B). Time taken for removal of caries was noted with stopwatch. Samples were prepared and seen under the scanning electron microscope for the presence of bacterial colonies. Data were analyzed using statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) Software.
No significant difference was found for the presence of bacterial colonies in both groups of deciduous and permanent teeth; however, time taken for caries removal by the chemomechanical method was twice than the mechanical method.
despite the insignificant presence of bacterial colonies and twice time taken as compared to mechanical method, chemomechanical method was easy to introduce, was painless, did not form smear layer and conserved the sound tooth structure.
机械去龋方法会导致去除健康牙体组织,产生疼痛、热量、恼人的声音和震动。化学机械去龋方法基于仅去除龋坏牙本质,保留健康牙本质完整。
本研究的目的是比较乳牙和恒牙中机械去龋和化学机械去龋方法的疗效。
总共30颗龋坏牙,包括15颗乳牙和15颗恒牙,均为牙本质龋,随机选取并通过病变中心切成两半,分别采用机械方法(A组)和化学机械方法(B组)去龋。用秒表记录去龋所需时间。制备样本并在扫描电子显微镜下观察是否存在细菌菌落。使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)软件分析数据。
乳牙和恒牙两组中细菌菌落的存在情况无显著差异;然而,化学机械方法去龋所需时间是机械方法的两倍。
尽管细菌菌落的存在不显著,且与机械方法相比所需时间长两倍,但化学机械方法易于实施,无痛,不形成玷污层并保留了健康牙体组织。