• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过改良的皮肤红斑狼疮疾病面积和严重程度指数比较0.1%他克莫司软膏与0.05%丙酸氯倍他索软膏治疗盘状红斑狼疮的疗效和安全性。

A comparative study in efficacy and safety of 0.1% tacrolimus and 0.05% clobetasol propionate ointment in discoid lupus erythematosus by modified cutaneous lupus erythematosus disease area and severity index.

作者信息

Pothinamthong Pornchai, Janjumratsang Patcharin

机构信息

The Institute of Dermatology, Ministry of Public Health, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

J Med Assoc Thai. 2012 Jul;95(7):933-40.

PMID:22919989
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety between 0.1% Tacrolimus ointment twice a day and 0.05% clobetasol propionate.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Twenty-one Thai patients 18 to 60 years old with DLE lesions on both right and left sides of the body, without SLE, were included in the present study. Each patient was randomly allocated to determine the use of one side for twice-daily 0.1% topical tacrolimus ointment and the other side for once-daily 0.05% clobetasol propionate ointment for six weeks. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by modified cutaneous lupus erythematosus disease area and severity index (CLASI) and global assessment score for patient efficacy evaluation.

RESULTS

Disease activity score were significantly decreased from baseline in both groups but clobetasol had better efficacy (p < 0.05). No significant change in disease damage score between the two groups. Both drugs were well tolerated. Transient pruritus and burning sensation were found in the tacrolimus group. Telangiectasia and acneiform eruption were found in the clobetasol group.

CONCLUSION

The present study proved the efficacy of twice-daily tacrolimus and once-daily clobetasol treatment for DLE lesion. Clobetasol has significantly higher efficacy and tacrolimus may be an alternative treatment.

摘要

目的

比较每天两次使用0.1%他克莫司软膏与每天一次使用0.05%丙酸氯倍他索的疗效和安全性。

材料与方法

本研究纳入了21名年龄在18至60岁之间、身体左右两侧均有盘状红斑狼疮(DLE)皮损且无系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)的泰国患者。每位患者被随机分配,一侧使用0.1%他克莫司软膏每日两次,另一侧使用0.05%丙酸氯倍他索软膏每日一次,为期六周。通过改良的皮肤红斑狼疮疾病面积和严重程度指数(CLASI)以及用于评估患者疗效的整体评估评分来评估临床结果。

结果

两组的疾病活动评分均较基线显著降低,但丙酸氯倍他索的疗效更好(p < 0.05)。两组之间的疾病损伤评分无显著变化。两种药物耐受性均良好。他克莫司组出现短暂瘙痒和烧灼感。丙酸氯倍他索组出现毛细血管扩张和痤疮样皮疹。

结论

本研究证实了每天两次使用他克莫司和每天一次使用丙酸氯倍他索治疗DLE皮损的疗效。丙酸氯倍他索的疗效显著更高,他克莫司可能是一种替代治疗方法。

相似文献

1
A comparative study in efficacy and safety of 0.1% tacrolimus and 0.05% clobetasol propionate ointment in discoid lupus erythematosus by modified cutaneous lupus erythematosus disease area and severity index.通过改良的皮肤红斑狼疮疾病面积和严重程度指数比较0.1%他克莫司软膏与0.05%丙酸氯倍他索软膏治疗盘状红斑狼疮的疗效和安全性。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2012 Jul;95(7):933-40.
2
0.03% Tacrolimus ointment applied once or twice daily is more efficacious than 1% hydrocortisone acetate in children with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis: results of a randomized double-blind controlled trial.对于中度至重度特应性皮炎儿童,每天涂抹一次或两次0.03%他克莫司软膏比1%醋酸氢化可的松更有效:一项随机双盲对照试验的结果。
Br J Dermatol. 2004 Mar;150(3):554-62. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2004.05782.x.
3
A double-blind randomized trial of 0.1% tacrolimus vs 0.05% clobetasol for the treatment of childhood vitiligo.一项比较0.1%他克莫司与0.05%丙酸氯倍他索治疗儿童白癜风的双盲随机试验。
Arch Dermatol. 2003 May;139(5):581-5. doi: 10.1001/archderm.139.5.581.
4
Efficacy of topical tacrolimus 0.3% in clobetasol propionate 0.05% ointment in therapy-resistant cutaneous lupus erythematosus: a cohort study.他克莫司 0.3% 软膏与丙酸氯倍他索 0.05% 软膏治疗抵抗性皮肤红斑狼疮的疗效:一项队列研究。
Clin Exp Dermatol. 2010 Jan;35(1):27-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2009.03351.x. Epub 2009 Jun 22.
5
Comparative efficacy of tacrolimus 0.1% ointment and clobetasol propionate 0.05% ointment in oral lichen planus: a randomized double-blind trial.他克莫司 0.1%软膏与丙酸氯倍他索 0.05%软膏治疗口腔扁平苔藓的疗效比较:一项随机、双盲试验。
Int J Dermatol. 2012 Nov;51(11):1371-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2012.05459.x.
6
Comparative effect of tacrolimus 0.1% ointment and clobetasol 0.05% ointment in patients with oral lichen planus.他克莫司0.1%软膏与丙酸氯倍他索0.05%软膏治疗口腔扁平苔藓的疗效比较
J Clin Periodontol. 2008 Mar;35(3):244-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01191.x.
7
Comparison of topical tacrolimus 0.1 % in pectin ointment with clobetasol 0.5% ointment in adults with moderate to severe desquamative gingivitis: A 4-week, randomized, double-blind clinical trial.0.1%他克莫司果胶软膏与0.5%丙酸氯倍他索软膏治疗成人中重度剥脱性龈炎的比较:一项为期4周的随机双盲临床试验。
Clin Ther. 2006 Sep;28(9):1296-302. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.09.022.
8
Successful treatment with topical tacrolimus in four cases of discoid lupus erythematosus.4例盘状红斑狼疮局部应用他克莫司治疗成功。
J Dermatol. 2006 Dec;33(12):887-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2006.00203.x.
9
Topical tacrolimus therapy of resistant cutaneous lesions in lupus erythematosus: a possible alternative.外用他克莫司治疗红斑狼疮耐药性皮肤损害:一种可能的替代方法。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004 Nov;43(11):1383-5. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh325. Epub 2004 Jul 20.
10
Pimecrolimus 1% cream versus betamethasone 17-valerate 0.1% cream in the treatment of facial discoid lupus erythematosus: a double-blind, randomized pilot study.吡美莫司乳膏 1%对比倍他米松 17-戊酸酯乳膏 0.1%治疗面部盘状红斑狼疮:一项双盲、随机的初步研究。
Clin Exp Dermatol. 2009 Oct;34(7):776-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2008.03138.x. Epub 2009 May 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends and collaborations in discoid lupus erythematosus research: a bibliometric analysis from 2010 to 2024.盘状红斑狼疮研究的趋势与合作:2010年至2024年的文献计量分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 20;12:1556976. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1556976. eCollection 2025.
2
Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.治疗系统性红斑狼疮皮肤病变的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 9;3(3):CD007478. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007478.pub2.
3
Update on Epidemiology and Clinical Assessment Tools of Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus and Dermatomyositis.
皮肤型红斑狼疮和皮肌炎的流行病学及临床评估工具的最新进展
Curr Dermatol Rep. 2013 Mar;2(1):48-57. doi: 10.1007/s13671-012-0037-3. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
4
Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus: Progress and Challenges.皮肤红斑狼疮:进展与挑战。
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2020 Apr 4;20(5):12. doi: 10.1007/s11882-020-00906-8.
5
Current Insights Into The Management Of Discoid Lupus Erythematosus.盘状红斑狼疮治疗的最新见解
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2019 Oct 3;12:721-732. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S184824. eCollection 2019.
6
Current Concepts and Future Approaches in the Treatment of Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus: A Comprehensive Review.当前治疗皮肤红斑狼疮的新理念和未来方法:全面综述。
Drugs. 2019 Jul;79(11):1199-1215. doi: 10.1007/s40265-019-01151-8.
7
Drugs for discoid lupus erythematosus.用于盘状红斑狼疮的药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 5;5(5):CD002954. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002954.pub3.
8
Therapeutic options for cutaneous lupus erythematosus: recent advances and future prospects.治疗皮肤红斑狼疮的选择:最新进展和未来前景。
Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2016 Oct;12(10):1109-21. doi: 10.1080/1744666X.2016.1188006. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
9
Update on pathogenesis and treatment of CLE.关于 CLE 的发病机制和治疗的最新进展。
Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2013 Sep;25(5):584-90. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0b013e32836437ba.