Dungan Kathleen M, Han Wen, Miele Anthony, Zeidan Trisha, Weiland Karen
Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012 Jul 1;6(4):884-91. doi: 10.1177/193229681200600420.
The accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in non-critically ill hospitalized patients with heart failure or severe hyperglycemia (SH) is unknown.
Hospitalized patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) exacerbation (receiving IV or subcutaneous insulin) or SH requiring insulin infusion were compared to outpatients referred for retrospective CGM.
Forty-three patients with CHF, 15 patients with SH, and 88 outpatients yielded 470, 164, and 2150 meter-sensor pairs, respectively. Admission glucose differed (188 versus 509 mg/dl in CHF and SH, p < .001) but not the first sensor glucose (p = .35). In continuous glucose error grid analysis, 67-78% of pairs during hypoglycemia were in zones A+B (p = .63), compared with 98-100% in euglycemia (p < .001) and 98%, 92%, and 99% (p = .001) during hyperglycemia for the CHF, SH, and outpatient groups, respectively. Mean absolute relative difference (MARD) was lower in the CHF versus the SH group in glucose strata above 100 mg/dl, but there was no difference between the CHF and outpatient groups. Linear regression models showed that CHF versus outpatient, SH versus CHF, and coefficient of variation were significant predictors of higher MARD. Among subjects with CHF, MARD was not associated with brain natriuretic peptide or change in plasma volume, but it was significantly higher in subjects randomized to IV insulin (p = .04).
The results suggest that SH and glycemic variability are more important determinants of CGM accuracy than known CHF status alone in hospitalized patients.
在非危重症住院的心力衰竭或严重高血糖(SH)患者中,持续葡萄糖监测(CGM)的准确性尚不清楚。
将因充血性心力衰竭(CHF)加重(接受静脉或皮下胰岛素治疗)或需要胰岛素输注的SH而住院的患者与接受回顾性CGM的门诊患者进行比较。
43例CHF患者、15例SH患者和88例门诊患者分别产生了470、164和2150个血糖仪对。入院时血糖不同(CHF和SH分别为188与509mg/dl,p<.001),但首次传感器血糖无差异(p = .35)。在连续葡萄糖误差网格分析中,低血糖期间67 - 78%的血糖仪对处于A + B区(p = .63),而正常血糖期间为98 - 100%(p<.001),CHF、SH和门诊患者组高血糖期间分别为98%、92%和99%(p = .001)。在血糖水平高于100mg/dl时,CHF组的平均绝对相对差异(MARD)低于SH组,但CHF组与门诊患者组之间无差异。线性回归模型显示,CHF与门诊患者、SH与CHF以及变异系数是MARD升高的显著预测因素。在CHF患者中,MARD与脑钠肽或血浆容量变化无关,但随机接受静脉胰岛素治疗的患者MARD显著更高(p = .04)。
结果表明,在住院患者中,SH和血糖变异性比单独已知的CHF状态更重要地决定了CGM的准确性。