• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

意大利结肠镜检查质量五年间的变化:一项全国性观察性研究。

Variation of quality of colonoscopy in Italy over five years: a nation-wide observational study.

机构信息

Gastroenterology Unit, Valduce Hospital, Como, Italy.

出版信息

Dig Liver Dis. 2013 Jan;45(1):28-32. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2012.07.018. Epub 2012 Aug 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.dld.2012.07.018
PMID:22921044
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: A nation-wide survey of colonoscopy practice carried out in 2004 showed disappointing data on colonoscopy quality in Italy. Present study was aimed prospectively at re-evaluating quality indicators of colonoscopy and their changes over a five-year-period.

METHODS

The main features of each Endoscopy Unit and performance indicators on consecutive colonoscopies performed in a 2-week period were recorded. Variation of colonoscopy quality was assessed by comparing caecal-intubation and polyp-detection rates in present survey with those collected five-years before; statistical analysis was restricted to centres participating in both data collections.

RESULTS

6158 colonoscopies from 116 centres were evaluated; unadjusted caecal-intubation rate was 83.0%, with 21.6% centres reporting a value >90%; mean polyp-detection rate was 32.0% (range 9.6-71.2% across centres). To assess variation of performance indicators, 4452 procedures from 77 centres were compared to 3589 procedures performed five-years before, in the same centres. A significant difference between the two rounds of data collections was observed for both caecal-intubation (82.6% versus 80.9%, p=0.043) and polyp-detection (31.3% versus 28.1%, p=0.002). However, 52 centres maintained a caecal-intubation rate constantly <90%.

CONCLUSIONS

Present data show that colonoscopy in Italy is still far below quality standards and that a significant improvement of practice did not occur over the last five years. Strategies to enhance colonoscopy quality should be pursued by professional societies.

摘要

背景/目的:2004 年进行的一项全国范围内的结肠镜检查实践调查显示,意大利的结肠镜检查质量数据令人失望。本研究旨在前瞻性地重新评估结肠镜检查的质量指标及其在五年期间的变化。

方法

记录每个内镜科室的主要特征以及在两周内连续进行的结肠镜检查的性能指标。通过将本次调查中盲肠插管率和息肉检出率与五年前收集的数据进行比较,评估结肠镜检查质量的变化;统计分析仅限于参与两次数据收集的中心。

结果

评估了来自 116 个中心的 6158 例结肠镜检查;未经调整的盲肠插管率为 83.0%,21.6%的中心报告值>90%;平均息肉检出率为 32.0%(各中心范围为 9.6-71.2%)。为评估性能指标的变化,将来自 77 个中心的 4452 例与相同中心五年前进行的 3589 例进行比较。在两轮数据收集之间观察到盲肠插管(82.6%比 80.9%,p=0.043)和息肉检出(31.3%比 28.1%,p=0.002)均有显著差异。然而,52 个中心的盲肠插管率始终保持在<90%以下。

结论

目前的数据表明,意大利的结肠镜检查仍远未达到质量标准,在过去五年中,实践并未显著改善。专业协会应采取策略来提高结肠镜检查的质量。

相似文献

1
Variation of quality of colonoscopy in Italy over five years: a nation-wide observational study.意大利结肠镜检查质量五年间的变化:一项全国性观察性研究。
Dig Liver Dis. 2013 Jan;45(1):28-32. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2012.07.018. Epub 2012 Aug 21.
2
Colonoscopy practice in Italy: a prospective survey on behalf of the Italian Association of Hospital Gastroenterologists.意大利的结肠镜检查实践:代表意大利医院胃肠病学家协会开展的一项前瞻性调查。
Dig Liver Dis. 2008 Nov;40(11):897-904. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.02.021. Epub 2008 Apr 18.
3
Technical performance of colonoscopy: the key role of sedation/analgesia and other quality indicators.结肠镜检查的技术性能:镇静/镇痛及其他质量指标的关键作用。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 May;103(5):1122-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01778.x. Epub 2008 Apr 28.
4
Effectiveness of a continuous quality improvement program on colonoscopy practice.持续质量改进计划对结肠镜检查实践的有效性。
Endoscopy. 2007 Apr;39(4):314-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-945196. Epub 2007 Feb 1.
5
[Quality indicators for colonoscopy: differences in polyp detection between endoscopists at one hospital].[结肠镜检查的质量指标:一家医院内镜医师之间息肉检出率的差异]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2012;156(24):A4219.
6
Quality evaluation of colonoscopy reporting and colonoscopy performance in daily clinical practice.结直肠镜报告质量和日常临床实践中结直肠镜性能的评估。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Jan;75(1):98-106. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.06.032. Epub 2011 Sep 10.
7
Quality and safety issues in procedural rural practice: a prospective evaluation of current quality and safety guidelines in 3000 colonoscopies.农村手术操作中的质量与安全问题:对3000例结肠镜检查当前质量与安全指南的前瞻性评估
Rural Remote Health. 2012;12:1949. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
8
The Norwegian Gastronet project: Continuous quality improvement of colonoscopy in 14 Norwegian centres.挪威胃肠内镜网络项目:挪威14个中心结肠镜检查的持续质量改进
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2006 Apr;41(4):481-7. doi: 10.1080/00365520500265208.
9
Quality in colonoscopy reporting: an assessment of compliance and performance improvement.结肠镜检查报告的质量:评估依从性和改进性能。
Dig Liver Dis. 2012 Aug;44(8):660-4. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2012.03.022. Epub 2012 May 11.
10
Variation among endoscopy units in the achievement of the standards of colonoscopic performance indicators.各内镜检查单位在达到结肠镜检查性能指标标准方面存在差异。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2008 Sep-Oct;55(86-87):1594-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Development, quality, and influencing factors of colonoscopy in China: results from the national census in 2013 and 2020.中国结肠镜检查的发展、质量及影响因素:2013年和2020年全国普查结果
Front Oncol. 2023 Sep 22;13:1276520. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1276520. eCollection 2023.
2
Diversity of endoscopy center operations and practice variation across California's safety-net hospital system: a statewide survey.加利福尼亚安全网医院系统内镜中心手术的多样性及实践差异:一项全州范围的调查。
BMC Res Notes. 2013 Jun 15;6:233. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-233.