Suppr超能文献

挪威胃肠内镜网络项目:挪威14个中心结肠镜检查的持续质量改进

The Norwegian Gastronet project: Continuous quality improvement of colonoscopy in 14 Norwegian centres.

作者信息

Hoff Geir, Bretthauer Michael, Huppertz-Hauss Gert, Kittang Eirik, Stallemo Asbjørn, Høie Ole, Dahler Stein, Nyhus Sverre, Halvorsen Fred-Arne, Pallenschat Jens, Vetvik Kåre, Kristian Sandvei Per, Friestad Joachim, Pytte Reidar, Coll Peter

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Telemark Hospital Skien, Norway.

出版信息

Scand J Gastroenterol. 2006 Apr;41(4):481-7. doi: 10.1080/00365520500265208.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The burden on colonoscopy capacity is considerable and expected to increase further as colorectal cancer screening programmes gain a foothold in Europe. In this situation, it is particularly important to evaluate the quality of the service given. In this article we present our first year of experience with a quality network of endoscopy centres in Norway (Gastronet).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A questionnaire focusing on caecal intubation rate and pain was completed by the endoscopist (on site) and patient (on the day after the examination). Fourteen centres participated with registration of 7370 colonoscopies by 73 endoscopists.

RESULTS

There was 100% endoscopist participation, 87% coverage of colonoscopies and an estimated 76% questionnaire coverage of the patient population. Overall caecal intubation rate was 91%, range 83% to 97% between centres (p < 0.001). Patients reporting severe pain during colonoscopy differed from 2 to 24% between centres (p < 0.001). Variations could only partly be explained by differences in procedure practice (sedation, CO2 insufflation). For individual endoscopists, improvement after feedback on performance was restricted to the group of endoscopists having contributed with only 50-99 registered colonoscopies.

CONCLUSIONS

In quality assurance programmes we recommend a limited number of variables for registration in order to secure high compliance by endoscopists and patients. One year of experience with Gastronet disclosed a satisfactory overall caecal intubation rate, but considerable variation between centres in practice and ability to offer painless colonoscopy. This suggests a need for formal, centralized training of colonoscopists or the development of quality standards for colonoscopy training and practice.

摘要

目的

随着结直肠癌筛查项目在欧洲逐步开展,结肠镜检查的工作量相当大,且预计还会进一步增加。在这种情况下,评估所提供服务的质量尤为重要。在本文中,我们介绍了挪威内镜中心质量网络(胃肠网)第一年的经验。

材料与方法

内镜医师(现场)和患者(检查后第二天)完成了一份关于盲肠插管率和疼痛情况的问卷。14个中心参与其中,73位内镜医师登记了7370例结肠镜检查。

结果

内镜医师参与率为100%,结肠镜检查覆盖率为87%,估计患者群体问卷覆盖率为76%。总体盲肠插管率为91%,各中心之间的范围为83%至97%(p<0.001)。各中心报告结肠镜检查期间严重疼痛的患者比例在2%至24%之间(p<0.001)。差异只能部分由操作实践(镇静、二氧化碳注入)的不同来解释。对于个体内镜医师,在得到绩效反馈后,改善情况仅限于登记结肠镜检查数量仅为50 - 99例的内镜医师群体。

结论

在质量保证项目中,我们建议登记有限数量的变量,以确保内镜医师和患者的高依从性。胃肠网一年的经验显示总体盲肠插管率令人满意,但各中心在实践和提供无痛结肠镜检查的能力方面存在相当大的差异。这表明需要对结肠镜医师进行正规的集中培训,或者制定结肠镜检查培训和实践的质量标准。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验