Suppr超能文献

首选分娩地点:荷兰低危初产妇的特征和动机。

Preferred place of birth: characteristics and motives of low-risk nulliparous women in the Netherlands.

机构信息

Midwifery Education & Studies Maastricht-ZUYD, Research Department Midwifery Science, PO Box 1256, 6201 BG Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Midwifery. 2012 Oct;28(5):609-18. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2012.07.010. Epub 2012 Aug 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

to explores preferences, characteristics and motives regarding place of birth of low-risk nulliparous women in the Netherlands.

DESIGN

a prospective cohort study of low-risk nulliparous women and their partners starting their pregnancy in midwifery-led care or in obstetric-led care. Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire, including questions on demographic, psychosocial and pregnancy factors and statements about motives with regard to place of birth. Depression, worry and self-esteem were explored using the Edinburgh Depression Scale (EDS), the Cambridge Worry Scale (CWS) and the Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale (RSE).

SETTING

participants were recruited in 100 independent midwifery practices and 14 hospitals from 2007 to 2011.

PARTICIPANTS

550 low-risk nulliparous women; 231 women preferred a home birth, 170 women a hospital birth in midwifery-led care and 149 women a birth in obstetric-led care.

FINDINGS

Significant differences in characteristics were found in the group who preferred a birth in obstetric-led care compared to the two groups who preferred midwifery-led care. Those women were older (F (2,551)=16.14, p<0.001), had a higher family income (χ(2) (6)=18.87, p=0.004), were more frequently pregnant after assisted reproduction (χ(2)(2)=35.90, p<0.001) and had a higher rate of previous miscarriage (χ(2)(2)=25.96, p<0.001). They also differed significantly on a few emotional aspects: more women in obstetric-led care had symptoms of a major depressive disorder (χ(2)(2)=6.54, p=0.038) and were worried about health issues (F (2,410)=8.90, p<0.001). Women's choice for a home birth is driven by a desire for greater personal autonomy, whereas women's choice for a hospital birth is driven by a desire to feel safe and control risks.

KEY CONCLUSIONS

the characteristics of women who prefer a hospital birth are different than the characteristics of women who prefer a home birth. It appears that for women preferring a hospital birth, the assumed safety of the hospital is more important than type of care provider. This brings up the question whether women are fully aware of the possibilities of maternity care services. Women might need concrete information about the availability and the characteristics of the services within the maternity care system and the risks and benefits associated with either setting, in order to make an informed choice where to give birth.

摘要

目的

探讨低危初产妇选择分娩地点的偏好、特征和动机。

设计

对 2007 年至 2011 年间在助产士主导的护理或产科主导的护理中开始妊娠的低危初产妇及其伴侣进行前瞻性队列研究。使用自我管理问卷收集数据,包括关于人口统计学、心理社会和妊娠因素的问题以及关于分娩地点的动机陈述。使用爱丁堡抑郁量表(EDS)、剑桥担忧量表(CWS)和罗森伯格自尊量表(RSE)探讨抑郁、担忧和自尊。

地点

参与者在 100 家独立的助产士诊所和 14 家医院招募。

参与者

550 名低危初产妇;231 名女性希望在家分娩,170 名女性希望在助产士主导的护理中在医院分娩,149 名女性希望在产科主导的护理中分娩。

结果

与更喜欢助产士主导的护理的两组相比,更喜欢产科主导的护理的组在特征上存在显著差异。这些女性年龄较大(F(2,551)=16.14,p<0.001),家庭收入较高(χ(2)(6)=18.87,p=0.004),更频繁地接受辅助生殖怀孕(χ(2)(2)=35.90,p<0.001),且先前流产率较高(χ(2)(2)=25.96,p<0.001)。他们在一些情绪方面也存在显著差异:在产科主导的护理中,更多的女性有重度抑郁障碍的症状(χ(2)(2)=6.54,p=0.038),并且担心健康问题(F(2,410)=8.90,p<0.001)。女性选择在家分娩是因为渴望更大的个人自主权,而女性选择在医院分娩是因为渴望感到安全并控制风险。

主要结论

选择在医院分娩的女性的特征与选择在家分娩的女性的特征不同。对于选择在医院分娩的女性来说,医院的安全性似乎比护理提供者的类型更重要。这就提出了一个问题,即女性是否完全了解产妇护理服务的可能性。女性可能需要关于产妇护理系统内服务的可用性和特征以及与任何环境相关的风险和益处的具体信息,以便在分娩地点做出明智的选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验