• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Exploring women's preferences for birth settings in England: A discrete choice experiment.探索英格兰女性对分娩环境的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 11;14(4):e0215098. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215098. eCollection 2019.
2
What influences birth place preferences, choices and decision-making amongst healthy women with straightforward pregnancies in the UK? A qualitative evidence synthesis using a 'best fit' framework approach.在英国,对于怀孕过程顺利的健康女性而言,是什么影响了她们对分娩地点的偏好、选择和决策?一项采用“最佳匹配”框架方法的定性证据综合分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Mar 31;17(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1279-7.
3
Women's birth place preferences in the United Kingdom: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of the quantitative literature.英国女性的分娩地点偏好:对定量文献的系统评价与叙述性综合分析
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Aug 8;16(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0998-5.
4
A mixed-methods study of women's birthplace preferences and decisions in England.一项关于英格兰女性出生地偏好与决策的混合方法研究。
Women Birth. 2024 Jul;37(4):101616. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2024.101616. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
5
Models of intrapartum care and women's trade-offs in remote and rural Scotland: a mixed-methods study.苏格兰偏远农村地区的分娩期护理模式及女性的权衡:一项混合方法研究。
BJOG. 2008 Apr;115(5):560-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01516.x. Epub 2007 Sep 27.
6
Eliciting women's preferences for place of child birth at a peri-urban setting in Nairobi, Kenya: A discrete choice experiment.在肯尼亚内罗毕的城郊地区,通过离散选择实验了解女性对分娩地点的偏好。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 10;15(12):e0242149. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242149. eCollection 2020.
7
Deciding on the mode of birth after a previous caesarean section - An online survey investigating women's preferences in Western Switzerland.既往剖宫产术后分娩方式的选择——一项调查瑞士西部女性偏好的在线调查
Midwifery. 2017 Jul;50:219-227. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.04.005. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
8
Survey of women's experiences of care in a new freestanding midwifery unit in an inner city area of London, England: 2. Specific aspects of care.英国伦敦市中心一个新的独立助产单元中女性护理体验调查:2. 护理的具体方面。
Midwifery. 2014 Sep;30(9):1009-20. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2014.05.008. Epub 2014 May 22.
9
Women's Preferences for Birthing Hospital in Denmark: A Discrete Choice Experiment.丹麦女性对分娩医院的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Patient. 2018 Dec;11(6):613-624. doi: 10.1007/s40271-018-0313-9.
10
An exploration of influences on women's birthplace decision-making in New Zealand: a mixed methods prospective cohort within the Evaluating Maternity Units study.新西兰女性出生地决策影响因素的探索:“评估产科单位”研究中的一项混合方法前瞻性队列研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Jun 20;14:210. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-210.

引用本文的文献

1
The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.健康经济学中离散选择实验的发展态势:一项系统综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01495-y.
2
Discrete choice modelling of hypertension patients' preferences for attributes of a public medical facility in Ibadan, Nigeria.尼日利亚伊巴丹高血压患者对公共医疗设施属性偏好的离散选择建模
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 16;25(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12257-z.
3
The relationship between ethnicity and place of birth in England: a mixed-methods study.英格兰的种族和出生地之间的关系:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Nov 27;24(1):798. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06977-z.
4
Preferences for Neurodevelopmental Follow-Up Care for Children: A Discrete Choice Experiment.儿童神经发育随访护理偏好的离散选择实验
Patient. 2024 Nov;17(6):645-662. doi: 10.1007/s40271-024-00717-3. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
5
Preferences of Recent Mums in Remote and Rural Areas for Type of Intrapartum Care: A Discrete Choice Experiment.偏远和农村地区近期产妇对产时护理类型的偏好:离散选择实验。
Patient. 2024 Nov;17(6):663-672. doi: 10.1007/s40271-024-00704-8. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
6
An Overview of Data Collection in Health Preference Research.健康偏好研究中的数据收集概述
Patient. 2024 Apr 25. doi: 10.1007/s40271-024-00695-6.
7
Patients' preferences in dental care: A discrete-choice experiment and an analysis of willingness-to-pay.患者对牙科护理的偏好:离散选择实验和支付意愿分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 27;18(2):e0280441. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280441. eCollection 2023.
8
The Perception of Women in Rural and Remote Scotland About Intrapartum Care: A Qualitative Study.苏格兰农村和偏远地区女性对产时护理的看法:一项定性研究。
Patient. 2023 Mar;16(2):117-125. doi: 10.1007/s40271-022-00608-5. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
9
Maternity service reconfigurations for intrapartum and postnatal midwifery staffing shortages: modelling of low-risk births in England.产程和产后助产人员配置不足的产科服务重组:英格兰低风险分娩建模。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 21;12(9):e051747. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051747.
10
Mobile applications for prematurity: a systematic review protocol.早产儿移动应用程序:系统评价方案。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2021 Sep 21;5(1):e001183. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2021-001183. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Correction: What matters to women during childbirth: A systematic qualitative review.更正:分娩期间对女性重要的因素:一项系统的定性综述。
PLoS One. 2018 May 17;13(5):e0197791. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197791. eCollection 2018.
2
Women's Preferences for Birthing Hospital in Denmark: A Discrete Choice Experiment.丹麦女性对分娩医院的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Patient. 2018 Dec;11(6):613-624. doi: 10.1007/s40271-018-0313-9.
3
Maternal and perinatal outcomes by planned place of birth among women with low-risk pregnancies in high-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.高收入国家低风险妊娠女性的计划分娩地点与孕产妇及围产期结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Midwifery. 2018 Jul;62:240-255. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.03.024. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
4
Improving the quality and content of midwives' discussions with low-risk women about their options for place of birth: Co-production and evaluation of an intervention package.提高助产士与低风险孕妇就分娩地点选择进行讨论的质量和内容:一项干预方案的共同制定与评估
Midwifery. 2018 Apr;59:118-126. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.01.016. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
5
How well do discrete choice experiments predict health choices? A systematic review and meta-analysis of external validity.离散选择实验在多大程度上能够预测健康选择?系统评价和元分析的外部有效性。
Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Nov;19(8):1053-1066. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-0954-6. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
6
Birthplace choices: what are the information needs of women when choosing where to give birth in England? A qualitative study using online and face to face focus groups.出生地选择:英国的女性在选择分娩地点时需要哪些信息?一项使用在线和面对面焦点小组的定性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jan 8;18(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1601-4.
7
Mapping midwifery and obstetric units in England.绘制英格兰助产士和产科单位分布图。
Midwifery. 2018 Jan;56:9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.09.009. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
8
Discrete Choice Experiments: A Guide to Model Specification, Estimation and Software.离散选择实验:模型设定、估计与软件指南
Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 Jul;35(7):697-716. doi: 10.1007/s40273-017-0506-4.
9
What influences birth place preferences, choices and decision-making amongst healthy women with straightforward pregnancies in the UK? A qualitative evidence synthesis using a 'best fit' framework approach.在英国,对于怀孕过程顺利的健康女性而言,是什么影响了她们对分娩地点的偏好、选择和决策?一项采用“最佳匹配”框架方法的定性证据综合分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Mar 31;17(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1279-7.
10
Women's preferences for childbirth experiences in the Republic of Ireland; a mixed methods study.爱尔兰共和国女性对分娩经历的偏好;一项混合方法研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jan 10;17(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1196-1.

探索英格兰女性对分娩环境的偏好:一项离散选择实验。

Exploring women's preferences for birth settings in England: A discrete choice experiment.

机构信息

Policy Research Unit in Maternal Health and Care, National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Apr 11;14(4):e0215098. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215098. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0215098
PMID:30973919
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6459528/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore pregnant women's preferences for birth setting in England.

DESIGN

Labelled discrete choice experiment (DCE).

SETTING

Online survey.

SAMPLE

Pregnant women recruited through social media and an online panel.

METHODS

We developed a DCE to assess women's preferences for four hypothetical birth settings based on seven attributes: reputation, continuity of care, distance from home, time to see a doctor, partner able to stay overnight, chance of straightforward birth and safety for baby. We used a mixed logit model, with setting modelled as an alternative-specific constant, and conducted a scenario analysis to evaluate the impact of changes in attribute levels on uptake of birth settings.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Women's preferences for birth setting.

RESULTS

257 pregnant women completed the DCE. All birth setting attributes, except 'time to see doctor', were significant in women's choice (p<0.05). There was significant heterogeneity in preferences for some attributes. Changes to levels for 'safety for the baby' and 'partner able to stay overnight' were associated with larger changes from baseline uptake of birth setting. If the preferences identified were translated into the real-world context up to a third of those who reported planning birth in an obstetric unit might choose a midwifery unit assuming universal access to all settings, and knowledge of the differences between settings.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that 'safety for the baby', 'chance of a straightforward birth' and 'can the woman's partner stay overnight following birth' were particularly important in women's preferences for hypothetical birth setting. If all birth settings were available to women and they were aware of the differences between them, it is likely that more low risk women who currently plan birth in OUs might choose a midwifery unit.

摘要

目的

探索英国孕妇对分娩环境的偏好。

设计

标记离散选择实验(DCE)。

设置

在线调查。

样本

通过社交媒体和在线小组招募的孕妇。

方法

我们开发了一个 DCE,根据七个属性评估女性对四个假设分娩环境的偏好:声誉、护理连续性、离家距离、看医生时间、伴侣能否过夜、顺产机会和婴儿安全。我们使用混合对数模型,将环境设置建模为特定替代项的常数,并进行了情景分析,以评估属性水平变化对分娩环境采用率的影响。

主要结果测量

女性对分娩环境的偏好。

结果

257 名孕妇完成了 DCE。除“看医生时间”外,所有分娩环境属性在女性选择中均具有重要意义(p<0.05)。一些属性的偏好存在显著异质性。“婴儿安全”和“伴侣能否过夜”水平的变化与分娩环境采用率从基线的较大变化相关。如果识别出的偏好转化为现实世界的情况,假设所有环境都可以普遍获得,并且了解环境之间的差异,那么多达三分之一报告计划在产科病房分娩的人可能会选择助产士单位。

结论

我们发现“婴儿安全”、“顺产机会”和“分娩后女性伴侣能否过夜”在女性对假设分娩环境的偏好中尤为重要。如果所有分娩环境都对女性开放,并且她们了解它们之间的差异,那么目前计划在 OUs 分娩的低风险女性中,可能会有更多人选择助产士单位。