Pauli B U, Augustin-Voss H G, el-Sabban M E, Johnson R C, Hammer D A
Department of Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.
Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1990 Nov;9(3):175-89. doi: 10.1007/BF00046359.
The initial, site-specific colonization of secondary organs by blood-borne cancer cells appears to be mediated by endothelial cell adhesion molecules. These molecules are part of the organ-specific microvascular phenotype and are regulated through complex interactions of the endothelium with the extracellular matrix (e.g., distinct matrix macromolecules and growth factors). They are induced in vitro by growing 'unspecific' (large vessel) endothelial cells on extracts of organ-specific biomatrices. In many respects, these molecules are similar to the various classes of chemically different adhesion molecules that regulate lymphocyte traffic, but are believed to be distinct from the inducible adhesion molecules that govern leukocyte adhesion during acute episodes of inflammation. Biochemical and biophysical data indicate that preference of tumor cell adhesion to organ-specific microvascular endothelium may not require qualitative differences of such homing receptors between endothelia, but may be explained on the basis of quantitative receptor differences as well as differences of receptor avidity. Following adhesion, the metastatic cascade proceeds by the establishment of metabolic conduits between the endothelium and adherent tumor cells. This heterotypic coupling represents an early step in the extravasation of cancer cells from the microvasculature, initiating endothelial cell retraction from its basement membrane and recanalization around the arrested tumor cell. These events, together with local growth promoting effects exerted by the metastasized organ, are believed to provide the basis for Paget's 'seed and soil' hypothesis of metastasis.
血源性癌细胞对次级器官的初始、位点特异性定植似乎是由内皮细胞粘附分子介导的。这些分子是器官特异性微血管表型的一部分,并通过内皮细胞与细胞外基质(如不同的基质大分子和生长因子)的复杂相互作用来调节。在器官特异性生物基质提取物上培养“非特异性”(大血管)内皮细胞可在体外诱导产生这些分子。在许多方面,这些分子类似于调节淋巴细胞运输的各类化学性质不同的粘附分子,但被认为与在炎症急性期控制白细胞粘附的诱导性粘附分子不同。生化和生物物理数据表明,肿瘤细胞对器官特异性微血管内皮的粘附偏好可能并不需要内皮之间此类归巢受体的质的差异,而是也可以基于受体数量差异以及受体亲和力差异来解释。粘附之后,转移级联通过在内皮细胞和粘附的肿瘤细胞之间建立代谢通道而进行。这种异型偶联代表癌细胞从微血管外渗的早期步骤,引发内皮细胞从其基底膜退缩并在停滞的肿瘤细胞周围重新形成通道。这些事件,连同转移器官施加的局部生长促进作用,被认为是佩吉特“种子与土壤”转移假说的基础。