Suppr超能文献

抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体:在系统性血管炎中的方法学方面和临床意义。

Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies: methodological aspects and clinical significance in systemic vasculitis.

机构信息

Microbiology Institute, San Carlo Borromeo Hospital, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Autoimmun Rev. 2013 Feb;12(4):487-95. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2012.08.008. Epub 2012 Aug 17.

Abstract

Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) are the serological hallmark of some idiopathic systemic vasculitides, such as granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) and, to a lesser extent, Churg-Strauss syndrome (CCS), the so-called ANCA-associated vasculitides (AAV). ANCA were first detected by immunofluorescence (IIFT), subsequently the target antigens myeloperoxidase (MPO) and proteinase 3 (PR3) were identified, allowing the development of the quantitative, antigen-specific assays. According to the guidelines, combining IIFT and PR3-ANCA/MPO-ANCA assures the optimal diagnostic specificity. Antigen specificity does not effectively differentiate among the different AAV, however C-ANCA/PR3-ANCA are mainly found in GPA, while P-ANCA/MPO-ANCA are more prevalent in MPA and CSS. Despite their diagnostic value, the performance of the widespread immunometric assays for ANCA testing is disappointing, particularly for the low sensitivity. In recent years, more "sensitive" assays have been developed, using the microplate as well as fully the automated technologies, with promising preliminary results. ANCA, may be detected in a number of pathological conditions other than small vessel vasculitis. However, in most of these non-vasculitic patients ANCA do not recognize MPO or PR3 as target antigens, but other granulocyte components, often multiple or unknown specificities. A positive ANCA result by itself is not diagnostic for AAV, clinical evidence and possibly histological confirmation are always required. On the other hand, a negative test result cannot completely rule out a diagnosis of AAV, as AAV without detectable ANCA exist. The appropriate use of ANCA testing strongly improves the diagnostic accuracy and clinical usefulness of the results.

摘要

抗中性粒细胞胞质抗体 (ANCA) 是一些特发性系统性血管炎的血清学标志,如肉芽肿性多血管炎 (GPA)、显微镜下多血管炎 (MPA),在较小程度上还有嗜酸性粒细胞性肉芽肿性多血管炎 (CCS),即所谓的抗中性粒细胞胞质抗体相关性血管炎 (AAV)。ANCA 首先通过免疫荧光 (IIFT) 检测到,随后鉴定出靶抗原髓过氧化物酶 (MPO) 和蛋白酶 3 (PR3),从而开发出定量、抗原特异性的检测方法。根据指南,结合 IIFT 和 PR3-ANCA/MPO-ANCA 可确保最佳的诊断特异性。抗原特异性并不能有效地区分不同的 AAV,但 C-ANCA/PR3-ANCA 主要见于 GPA,而 P-ANCA/MPO-ANCA 则更为常见于 MPA 和 CSS。尽管具有诊断价值,但广泛用于 ANCA 检测的免疫测定法的性能令人失望,特别是敏感性较低。近年来,开发了更多“敏感”的检测方法,使用微孔板和完全自动化的技术,具有有前途的初步结果。除了小血管血管炎外,ANCA 还可在许多其他病理情况下检测到。然而,在大多数这些非血管炎性患者中,ANCA 并不识别 MPO 或 PR3 作为靶抗原,而是识别其他粒细胞成分,通常是多种或未知的特异性。ANCA 阳性结果本身不能诊断为 AAV,始终需要临床证据和可能的组织学证实。另一方面,阴性检测结果不能完全排除 AAV 的诊断,因为存在无法检测到 ANCA 的 AAV。正确使用 ANCA 检测可显著提高诊断准确性和临床结果的实用性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验