Tumor Biology Laboratory, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Acta Haematol. 2012;128(4):223-32. doi: 10.1159/000339696. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
Here we compare the management and survival outcomes of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients who had early or late imatinib mesylate (IM) therapy. The cytogenetic and molecular responses of 189 CML patients were analyzed. Of this group, 121 patients were classified as the early chronic phase (ECP) group and started IM within 12 months of diagnosis. The other 68 patients were classified as the late chronic phase (LCP) group who had been treated with interferon (IFN)-alpha-2 and crossed over to IM more than 12 months after diagnosis. The overall rates of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and major molecular response (MMR) at last follow-up were 83.6 and 78.1% in the ECP and LCP groups, respectively. The CCyR rates were 89.3 (for ECP patients) versus 73.5% (for LCP patients; p < 0.0001). At last follow-up, 82.4% ECP and 64.2% LCP patients had achieved an MMR (p < 0.0001). No significant differences were noted between the two groups with regard to survival outcomes. Our experience reveals that IM is an effective rescue therapy in most CML LCP patients who are intolerant or in whom IFN-alpha therapy fails. Such therapeutic options should be considered in LCP patients, particularly in countries where IM may not be available.
在这里,我们比较了接受早期或晚期甲磺酸伊马替尼(IM)治疗的慢性髓性白血病(CML)患者的治疗管理和生存结局。分析了 189 例 CML 患者的细胞遗传学和分子反应。在这组患者中,121 例被分类为早期慢性期(ECP)组,在诊断后 12 个月内开始接受 IM 治疗。另 68 例被分类为晚期慢性期(LCP)组,在诊断后超过 12 个月接受干扰素(IFN)-α-2 治疗并转为 IM 治疗。在最后一次随访时,ECP 和 LCP 组的完全细胞遗传学缓解(CCyR)和主要分子缓解(MMR)的总体率分别为 83.6%和 78.1%。CCyR 率分别为 89.3%(ECP 患者)和 73.5%(LCP 患者;p<0.0001)。在最后一次随访时,82.4%的 ECP 和 64.2%的 LCP 患者达到了 MMR(p<0.0001)。两组患者的生存结局无显著差异。我们的经验表明,对于不耐受或 IFN-α 治疗失败的大多数 CML LCP 患者,IM 是一种有效的挽救治疗。对于 LCP 患者,特别是在无法获得 IM 的国家,应考虑这种治疗选择。