Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC USA ; UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC USA.
Transl Behav Med. 2012 Mar;2(1):82-92. doi: 10.1007/s13142-011-0107-2.
Pharmacological and interventional pain medicine treatments are emphasized in the routine treatment of chronic pain despite strong evidence for the efficacy and safety of behavioral approaches. Most medical professionals have not incorporated behavioral pain treatments into their practices. Internet-based interventions have the potential to increase clinical use of these treatments. We discuss the strengths and weaknesses of current Internet-based behavioral pain management interventions, focusing on three broad intervention categories: therapist-guided interventions, unguided (automated) interventions, and pain-relevant applications for mobile platforms. Examples of each category are discussed, revealing a high degree of variation in approaches, user interfaces, and components as well as variability in the degree to which these interventions have been subjected to empirical testing. Finally, we highlight key issues for research and clinical implementation, with the goal of advancing this field so that it can meet its potential to increase access to evidence-based behavioral medicine treatments for chronic pain.
尽管行为方法的疗效和安全性有充分证据,但在慢性疼痛的常规治疗中,仍强调药物和介入性疼痛医学治疗。大多数医疗专业人员尚未将行为疼痛治疗纳入其治疗实践。基于互联网的干预措施有可能增加这些治疗方法的临床应用。我们讨论了当前基于互联网的行为疼痛管理干预措施的优缺点,重点关注三大干预类别:治疗师指导的干预、无指导(自动化)干预和移动平台上与疼痛相关的应用。讨论了每个类别的示例,揭示了方法、用户界面和组件的高度差异,以及这些干预措施在多大程度上经过实证测试的差异。最后,我们强调了研究和临床实施的关键问题,目的是推动这一领域的发展,使其能够充分发挥潜力,为慢性疼痛患者提供循证行为医学治疗方法。