相似文献
1
Public distress as a moral consideration in after-birth abortion.
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2012 Mar;30(1):48-51. doi: 10.1007/BF03351332.
2
After-birth abortion.
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2012 Mar;30(1):1-3.
3
Moral uncertainty and the moral status of early human life.
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2012 Mar;30(1):52-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03351333.
4
'After-birth abortion' and arguments from potential.
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2012 Mar;30(1):58-60. doi: 10.1007/BF03351334.
5
Some comments on the paper 'After-birth abortion: why should the baby live'?
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2012 Mar;30(1):44-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03351331.
6
The performativity of personhood.
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2012 Mar;30(1):61-4. doi: 10.1007/BF03351335.
7
Beyond Infanticide: How Psychological Accounts of Persons Can Justify Harming Infants.
New Bioeth. 2018 Jul;24(2):106-121. doi: 10.1080/20502877.2018.1438771. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
8
Quo vadis, bioethics.
Isr Med Assoc J. 2012 Sep;14(9):535-7.
9
Public distress as a moral consideration in after-birth abortion.
J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):323. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-101164b.
10
Reasons and freedom.
Hastings Cent Rep. 2013 Jan-Feb;43(1):4-5. doi: 10.1002/hast.120.
Zotero 插件