• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新辅助放化疗联合手术治疗并不增加 70 岁以上患者的发病率。

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by esophagectomy does not increase morbidity in patients over 70.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Dis Esophagus. 2013 Jul;26(5):510-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2012.01394.x. Epub 2012 Aug 23.

DOI:10.1111/j.1442-2050.2012.01394.x
PMID:22925313
Abstract

Esophagectomy in elderly esophageal carcinoma patients is correlated with a high morbidity and even mortality. Studies on neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NT) in elderly patients are scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of advanced age in combination with NT in esophageal carcinoma patients who underwent an esophagectomy. Patients who underwent NT prior to esophagectomy between 1993 and 2010 were divided into three groups: <70, 70-74, and ≥75 years. Toxicity of NT and postoperative morbidity were compared between groups. Primary endpoints were toxicity, complication rate, and survival. Two hundred thirteen patients underwent NT during the study period, 26 were aged 70-74 years, and 17 were ≥70 years. Toxicity of NT was comparable for younger and elderly patients (46% vs. 54% vs. 47%, P = 0.263). Overall complications occurred in 62% of younger patients versus 73% and 71% among patients aged 70-74 years and ≥75 years, respectively (P = 0.836). Cardiac complications occurred in 14% of younger patients versus 27% and 41% of elderly patients (P = 0.021). Three-year survival rates were 59% versus 44% versus 31% among patients aged <70, 70-74, and ≥75 years, respectively (P = 0.237). Higher age (odds ratio 1.750, P < 0.001) was an independent risk factor for development of cardiac complications. Toxicity of NT and postoperative complications are comparable for patients aged <70, 70-74, and ≥75 years, with the exception of cardiac complications. Therefore, we consider NT followed by esophagectomy in elderly patients a safe treatment modality in our center.

摘要

老年食管癌患者的食管切除术与高发病率甚至高死亡率相关。关于老年患者新辅助放化疗(NT)的研究很少。本研究旨在评估高龄与 NT 联合应用于接受食管切除术的食管癌患者的效果。1993 年至 2010 年间,在接受 NT 治疗后接受食管切除术的患者被分为三组:<70 岁、70-74 岁和≥75 岁。比较各组间 NT 的毒性和术后发病率。主要终点是毒性、并发症发生率和生存率。在研究期间,213 例患者接受了 NT,26 例年龄为 70-74 岁,17 例年龄≥70 岁。年轻患者和老年患者的 NT 毒性相当(46%比 54%比 47%,P=0.263)。年轻患者中,总并发症发生率为 62%,70-74 岁和≥75 岁患者分别为 73%和 71%(P=0.836)。年轻患者中发生心脏并发症的比例为 14%,70-74 岁和≥75 岁患者分别为 27%和 41%(P=0.021)。年龄<70 岁、70-74 岁和≥75 岁的患者 3 年生存率分别为 59%、44%和 31%(P=0.237)。高龄(比值比 1.750,P<0.001)是发生心脏并发症的独立危险因素。<70 岁、70-74 岁和≥75 岁患者的 NT 毒性和术后并发症相当,除心脏并发症外。因此,我们认为 NT 联合食管切除术在我们中心是一种安全的老年患者治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by esophagectomy does not increase morbidity in patients over 70.新辅助放化疗联合手术治疗并不增加 70 岁以上患者的发病率。
Dis Esophagus. 2013 Jul;26(5):510-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2012.01394.x. Epub 2012 Aug 23.
2
A retrospective comparison of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimens for locally advanced esophageal cancer.局部晚期食管癌新辅助放化疗方案的回顾性比较
Dis Esophagus. 2017 Jul 1;30(7):1-8. doi: 10.1093/dote/dox025.
3
Comparison of two neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimens in patients with potentially curable esophageal carcinoma.比较两种新辅助放化疗方案在潜在可治愈食管癌患者中的应用。
Dis Esophagus. 2014 May-Jun;27(4):380-7. doi: 10.1111/dote.12110. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
4
Impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on postoperative course after curative-intent transthoracic esophagectomy in esophageal cancer patients.新辅助放化疗对食管癌根治性经胸食管切除术后术后过程的影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Feb;21(2):605-11. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3316-8. Epub 2013 Oct 8.
5
Radiation dose does not influence anastomotic complications in patients with esophageal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation and transhiatal esophagectomy.对于接受新辅助放化疗和经裂孔食管切除术治疗的食管癌患者,辐射剂量并不影响吻合口并发症。
Radiat Oncol. 2015 Mar 6;10:59. doi: 10.1186/s13014-015-0361-4.
6
Different recurrence pattern after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy compared to surgery alone in esophageal cancer patients.与单纯手术相比,新辅助放化疗后的食管癌患者具有不同的复发模式。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Nov;20(12):4008-15. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3102-7. Epub 2013 Jul 10.
7
Perioperative chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or GEJ adenocarcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis comparing toxicity, pathologic outcome, and survival.食管癌或胃食管交界腺癌围手术期化疗与新辅助放化疗的比较:一项倾向评分匹配分析,比较毒性、病理结果和生存率。
J Surg Oncol. 2017 Jun;115(7):812-820. doi: 10.1002/jso.24596. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
8
Outcomes of trimodality CROSS regimen in older adults with locally advanced esophageal cancer.三联 CROSS 方案治疗老年局部晚期食管癌的疗效。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Oct;47(10):2667-2674. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.04.013. Epub 2021 Apr 17.
9
CMISG1701: a multicenter prospective randomized phase III clinical trial comparing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy to neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy in patients with locally advanced resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (cTNM) (NCT03001596).CMISG1701:一项多中心前瞻性随机III期临床试验,比较新辅助放化疗与新辅助化疗后行微创食管切除术在局部晚期可切除食管鳞状细胞癌(cTNM)患者中的疗效(NCT03001596)。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Jun 28;17(1):450. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3446-7.
10
Totally minimally invasive esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: Long-term oncologic outcomes.新辅助放化疗后完全微创食管切除术:长期肿瘤学结局
J Surg Oncol. 2018 Mar;117(4):651-658. doi: 10.1002/jso.24935.

引用本文的文献

1
Prehabilitation Reduces Occurrence of Anastomotic Leaks After Esophagectomy-A Retrospective Cohort Analysis and Meta-analysis.术前康复可降低食管癌切除术后吻合口漏的发生率——一项回顾性队列分析和荟萃分析
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2025 Jun 11;56(1):132. doi: 10.1007/s12029-025-01213-z.
2
Esophageal Cancer in Elderly Patients, Current Treatment Options and Outcomes; A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis.老年患者的食管癌:当前治疗选择与结果;系统评价与汇总分析
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Apr 27;13(9):2104. doi: 10.3390/cancers13092104.
3
Treatment-related toxicity and outcomes in older versus younger patients with esophageal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation.
接受新辅助放化疗的老年与年轻食管癌患者的治疗相关毒性及预后
J Geriatr Oncol. 2020 May;11(4):668-674. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.06.014. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
4
Effect of Extending the Original Eligibility Criteria for the CROSS Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy on Toxicity and Survival in Esophageal Cancer.扩大CROSS新辅助放化疗原入选标准对食管癌毒性和生存的影响
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Jul;24(7):1811-1820. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5797-3. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
5
Prognostic Nomogram for Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma after Radical Esophagectomy.根治性食管切除术后胸段食管鳞状细胞癌的预后列线图
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 20;10(4):e0124437. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124437. eCollection 2015.
6
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for resectable esophageal cancer: an in-depth study of randomized controlled trials and literature review.可切除食管癌的新辅助放化疗:随机对照试验的深入研究和文献综述。
Cancer Biol Med. 2014 Sep;11(3):191-201. doi: 10.7497/j.issn.2095-3941.2014.03.005.