Suppr超能文献

三联 CROSS 方案治疗老年局部晚期食管癌的疗效。

Outcomes of trimodality CROSS regimen in older adults with locally advanced esophageal cancer.

机构信息

Division of Aging, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Division of Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Oct;47(10):2667-2674. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.04.013. Epub 2021 Apr 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal cancer followed by Surgery (CROSS regimen) is standard of care for locally-advanced esophageal cancer. We evaluated CROSS completion rates, toxicity, and postoperative outcomes between older and younger adults receiving trimodality therapy.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of patients with locally-advanced esophageal cancer who underwent CROSS regimen from May 2016 to January 2020 at a single academic center. Outcomes of those aged ≥70-years-old and <70 years-old were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 201 patients, 136 were <70 and 65 were ≥70 years. Older adults were more likely to be male (91% vs. 79%; p = 0.045), have higher ECOG scores (median 1 vs. 0; p = 0.003), Charlson-comorbidity index (median 6 vs. 4; p < 0.001), and undergo open procedures (20% vs. 8% p = 0.008). Most completed CROSS regimen (78% vs. 84% respectively) with similar rates of treatment discontinuation and dose reduction (all p > 0.05). Time to surgery following neoadjuvant therapy was similar between age groups, except in those ≥80-years-old as compared to <70-years-old (p < 0.05). Overall toxicity rates were similar (68% vs. 71% respectively; p = 0.676). Only rates of delirium (19% vs. 5%) and urinary retention (9% vs. 0%) were higher in older adults (both p < 0.05). Length of stay, discharge disposition, mortality, and overall survival were similar. Age was not an independent risk factor for complication, neoadjuvant toxicity or completion, surgery timing, nor worse overall or recurrence-free survival (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Trimodality CROSS regimen for esophageal cancer in older adults is feasible, with similar completion rates and postoperative outcomes as compared to their younger counterparts.

摘要

背景

放化疗联合手术(CROSS 方案)是局部晚期食管癌的标准治疗方法。我们评估了接受三联疗法的老年和年轻患者的 CROSS 方案完成率、毒性和术后结果。

方法

回顾性分析 2016 年 5 月至 2020 年 1 月在一家学术中心接受 CROSS 方案治疗的局部晚期食管癌患者。分析年龄≥70 岁和<70 岁患者的结果。

结果

201 例患者中,136 例年龄<70 岁,65 例年龄≥70 岁。老年患者更可能为男性(91%比 79%;p=0.045)、ECOG 评分更高(中位数 1 比 0;p=0.003)、Charlson 合并症指数更高(中位数 6 比 4;p<0.001),并且接受开放性手术(20%比 8%;p=0.008)。大多数患者完成了 CROSS 方案(分别为 78%和 84%),治疗中断和剂量减少的发生率相似(均 p>0.05)。新辅助治疗后手术时间在年龄组之间相似,但 80 岁以上组与<70 岁组相比有所延长(p<0.05)。总体毒性发生率相似(分别为 68%和 71%;p=0.676)。只有老年患者的谵妄发生率(19%比 5%)和尿潴留发生率(9%比 0%)较高(均 p<0.05)。住院时间、出院去向、死亡率和总生存率相似。年龄不是并发症、新辅助毒性或完成、手术时机以及总生存率或无复发生存率较差的独立危险因素(p>0.05)。

结论

三联疗法 CROSS 方案治疗老年食管癌是可行的,与年轻患者相比,完成率和术后结果相似。

相似文献

1
Outcomes of trimodality CROSS regimen in older adults with locally advanced esophageal cancer.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Oct;47(10):2667-2674. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.04.013. Epub 2021 Apr 17.
6
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by esophagectomy does not increase morbidity in patients over 70.
Dis Esophagus. 2013 Jul;26(5):510-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2012.01394.x. Epub 2012 Aug 23.
7
Long-term Treatment Outcomes for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer: A Single-Institution Experience.
Am J Clin Oncol. 2016 Oct;39(5):448-52. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000089.
9
Advanced Age is Not a Contraindication for Treatment With Curative Intent in Esophageal Cancer.
Am J Clin Oncol. 2018 Sep;41(9):919-926. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000390.
10
Low- vs. High-Dose Neoadjuvant Radiation in Trimodality Treatment of Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 May;23(5):885-894. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-4007-3. Epub 2018 Oct 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Epidemiology of cancer in older adults: a systematic review of age-related differences in solid malignancies treatment.
Curr Oncol Rep. 2025 Mar;27(3):290-311. doi: 10.1007/s11912-025-01638-6. Epub 2025 Feb 15.
2
Management of esogastric cancer in older patients.
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2024 Aug 31;16:17588359241272941. doi: 10.1177/17588359241272941. eCollection 2024.
5
Long-term Outcomes Following Esophagectomy in Older and Younger Adults with Esophageal Cancer.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Jun;26(6):1119-1131. doi: 10.1007/s11605-022-05295-z. Epub 2022 Mar 31.

本文引用的文献

2
Robotic-assisted McKeown esophagectomy.
J Vis Surg. 2019 Apr;5. doi: 10.21037/jovs.2019.03.14. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
4
Postoperative outcomes of esophagectomy for cancer in elderly patients.
J Surg Res. 2018 Sep;229:9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.03.050. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
8
Neoadjuvant chemoradiation is associated with improved overall survival in older patients with esophageal cancer.
J Geriatr Oncol. 2018 Jan;9(1):40-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2017.08.010. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
9
Minimally invasive esophagectomy: the Brigham and Women's Hospital experience.
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Mar;6(2):175-178. doi: 10.21037/acs.2017.03.13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验