• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

扩大CROSS新辅助放化疗原入选标准对食管癌毒性和生存的影响

Effect of Extending the Original Eligibility Criteria for the CROSS Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy on Toxicity and Survival in Esophageal Cancer.

作者信息

de Heer E C, Hulshoff J B, Klerk D, Burgerhof J G M, de Groot D J A, Plukker J Th M, Hospers G A P

机构信息

Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Jul;24(7):1811-1820. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5797-3. Epub 2017 Feb 10.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-017-5797-3
PMID:28188501
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5486922/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with curable esophageal cancer (EC) who proceed beyond the original Chemoradiotherapy for Oesophageal Cancer Followed by Surgery Study (CROSS) eligibility criteria are also treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). This study assessed the effect that extending the CROSS eligibility criteria for nCRT has on treatment-related toxicity and overall survival (OS) in EC.

METHODS

The study enrolled 161 patients with locally advanced EC (T1N1-3/T2-4aN0-3/M0) treated with the CROSS schedule followed by esophagectomy. Group 1 consisted of 89 patients who met the CROSS criteria, and group 2 consisted of 72 patients who met the extended eligibility criteria, i.e. a tumor length greater than 8 cm (n = 24), more than 10% weight loss (n = 35), more than 2-4 cm extension in the stomach (n = 21), celiac lymph node metastasis (n = 13), and/or age over 75 years (n = 2). The study assessed the differences in nCRT-associated toxicity [National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade ≥ 3] and 90-day postoperative mortality. Moreover, the prognostic value for OS was assessed with multivariate Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

No difference was found in nCRT-associated toxicity (P = 0.117), postoperative complications (P = 0.783), and 90-day mortality (P = 0.492). The OS differed significantly (P = 0.004), with a median of 37.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 10.4-64.2 months] for group 1 and 17.2 months (95% CI 13.8-20.7 months) for group 2. Pathologic N stage (P = 0.023), pathologic T stage (P = 0.043), and group 2 (P = 0.008) were independent prognostic factors for OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Extension of the CROSS study eligibility criteria for nCRT did not affect nCRT-associated toxicity, postoperative complications, and postoperative mortality, but was prognostic for OS.

摘要

背景

对于可治愈的食管癌(EC)患者,若超出了最初的食管癌放化疗后手术研究(CROSS)纳入标准,也会接受新辅助放化疗(nCRT)。本研究评估了扩大nCRT的CROSS纳入标准对EC患者治疗相关毒性和总生存期(OS)的影响。

方法

本研究纳入了161例局部晚期EC患者(T1N1 - 3/T2 - 4aN0 - 3/M0),接受CROSS方案治疗后行食管切除术。第1组由89例符合CROSS标准的患者组成,第2组由72例符合扩大纳入标准的患者组成,即肿瘤长度大于8 cm(n = 24)、体重减轻超过10%(n = 35)、胃受累超过2 - 4 cm(n = 21)、腹腔淋巴结转移(n = 13)和/或年龄超过75岁(n = 2)。本研究评估了nCRT相关毒性(美国国立癌症研究所不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE)≥3级)和术后90天死亡率的差异。此外,通过多因素Cox回归分析评估OS的预后价值。

结果

nCRT相关毒性(P = 0.117)、术后并发症(P = 0.783)和90天死亡率(P = 0.492)方面未发现差异。OS有显著差异(P = 0.004),第1组的中位OS为37.3个月[95%置信区间(CI),10.4 - 64.2个月],第2组为17.2个月(95% CI 13.8 - 20.7个月)。病理N分期(P = 0.023)、病理T分期(P = 0.043)和第2组(P = 0.008)是OS的独立预后因素。

结论

扩大nCRT的CROSS研究纳入标准不影响nCRT相关毒性、术后并发症和术后死亡率,但对OS有预后意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7a1/5486922/2ddd6d36a46b/10434_2017_5797_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7a1/5486922/2ddd6d36a46b/10434_2017_5797_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7a1/5486922/2ddd6d36a46b/10434_2017_5797_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of Extending the Original Eligibility Criteria for the CROSS Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy on Toxicity and Survival in Esophageal Cancer.扩大CROSS新辅助放化疗原入选标准对食管癌毒性和生存的影响
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Jul;24(7):1811-1820. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5797-3. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
2
Lymph node harvest in esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.新辅助放化疗后食管癌的淋巴结清扫。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Sep;20(9):3038-43. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-2988-4. Epub 2013 Apr 28.
3
Neoadjuvant versus definitive chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer : Outcomes and patterns of failure.新辅助放化疗与根治性放化疗治疗局部晚期食管癌:结局和失败模式。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2018 Feb;194(2):116-124. doi: 10.1007/s00066-017-1211-0. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
4
The prognostic value of residual nodal disease following neoadjuvant chemoradiation for esophageal cancer in patients with complete primary tumor response.新辅助放化疗后原发肿瘤完全缓解的食管癌患者残留淋巴结疾病的预后价值。
J Surg Oncol. 2015 Nov;112(6):597-602. doi: 10.1002/jso.24050. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
5
Oncologic Outcomes According to Remnant Lymph Node Metastases in Pathologic T0 (ypT0) Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Following Prospective Neoadjuvant Therapy and Surgery.前瞻性新辅助治疗及手术后,病理T0(ypT0)食管鳞状细胞癌中残留淋巴结转移的肿瘤学结局
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(6):1851-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4195-3. Epub 2014 Oct 25.
6
Interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: does delayed surgery impact outcome?新辅助放化疗与手术治疗食管鳞癌的时间间隔:手术延迟是否影响预后?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Dec;20(13):4245-51. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3139-7.
7
Pathologic nonresponders after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for esophageal cancer demonstrate no survival benefit compared with patients treated with primary esophagectomy.与接受单纯手术治疗的患者相比,新辅助放化疗后病理完全缓解的食管癌患者无生存获益。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 May;19(5):1678-84. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-2078-4. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
8
Loss of Skeletal Muscle Mass During Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Predicts Postoperative Mortality in Esophageal Cancer Surgery.新辅助放化疗期间骨骼肌质量的丧失可预测食管癌手术的术后死亡率。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Dec;22(13):4445-52. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4558-4. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
9
CMISG1701: a multicenter prospective randomized phase III clinical trial comparing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy to neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy in patients with locally advanced resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (cTNM) (NCT03001596).CMISG1701:一项多中心前瞻性随机III期临床试验,比较新辅助放化疗与新辅助化疗后行微创食管切除术在局部晚期可切除食管鳞状细胞癌(cTNM)患者中的疗效(NCT03001596)。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Jun 28;17(1):450. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3446-7.
10
Clinical Significance of F-Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography-Positive Lymph Nodes to Outcomes of Trimodal Therapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.氟-18 氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描阳性淋巴结对食管鳞癌三联治疗结局的临床意义。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Jun;26(6):1869-1878. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07158-5. Epub 2019 Jan 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of extending the original criteria in the Chemoradiotherapy for Oesophageal Cancer followed by Surgery Study (CROSS) regimen on treatment outcome in locally advanced esophageal cancer patients.食管癌放化疗联合手术研究(CROSS)方案中扩大原标准对局部晚期食管癌患者治疗结局的影响。
ESMO Open. 2025 May;10(5):105098. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105098. Epub 2025 May 15.
2
Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancers.局部晚期食管癌的新辅助治疗
Front Oncol. 2022 Apr 7;12:734581. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.734581. eCollection 2022.
3
Trimodality therapy for esophageal cancer: The role of surgical and radiation treatment parameters in the development of anastomotic complications.

本文引用的文献

1
Definitive or Preoperative Chemoradiation Therapy for Esophageal Cancer: Patterns of Care and Survival Outcomes.食管癌的根治性或术前放化疗:治疗模式与生存结果
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Jun;101(6):2148-54. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.12.056. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
2
Survival in Patients With Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Undergoing Trimodality Therapy Is Independent of Regional Lymph Node Location.接受三联疗法的食管腺癌患者的生存率与区域淋巴结位置无关。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Mar;101(3):1075-80; Discussion 1080-1. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.09.063. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
3
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial.
食管癌的三联疗法:手术和放射治疗参数在吻合口并发症发展中的作用。
Thorac Cancer. 2021 Dec;12(23):3121-3129. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.14130. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
4
Radiomics Signature Facilitates Organ-Saving Strategy in Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy.影像组学特征有助于接受新辅助放化疗的食管鳞状细胞癌患者的器官保留策略。
Front Oncol. 2021 Feb 19;10:615167. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.615167. eCollection 2020.
5
Effect of Extending the Original CROSS Criteria on Tumor Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Cancer Patients: A National Multicenter Cohort Analysis.扩大原始 CROSS 标准对食管癌患者新辅助放化疗肿瘤反应的影响:一项全国多中心队列分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Jul;28(7):3951-3960. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09372-y. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
6
Taxane-based or platinum-based combination chemotherapy given concurrently with radiation followed by surgery resulting in high cure rates in esophageal cancer patients.以紫杉烷或铂类为基础的联合化疗与放疗同时进行,随后进行手术,使得食管癌患者有较高的治愈率。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Feb;99(9):e19295. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019295.
7
Validity of upfront surgery for patients with unsuspected lymph node metastasis in esophageal cancer: a propensity scoring matching study.食管癌中未怀疑有淋巴结转移患者先行手术的有效性:一项倾向评分匹配研究
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Jun 7;13(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s13019-018-0757-y.
8
Esophageal cancer developed in a radiated field: can we reduce the risk of a poor prognosis cancer?放射野内发生的食管癌:我们能否降低预后不良癌症的风险?
J Thorac Dis. 2017 Jul;9(7):1767-1771. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.06.45.
新辅助放化疗联合手术与单纯手术治疗食管或食管胃交界癌(CROSS):一项随机对照临床试验的长期结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Sep;16(9):1090-1098. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00040-6. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
4
Detecting interval metastases and response assessment using 18F-FDG PET/CT after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer.18F-FDG PET/CT 检测食管癌新辅助放化疗后间隔转移和疗效评估。
Clin Nucl Med. 2014 Oct;39(10):862-7. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000000517.
5
A comparison of carboplatin and paclitaxel with cisplatinum and 5-fluorouracil in definitive chemoradiation in esophageal cancer patients.卡铂和紫杉醇与顺铂和5-氟尿嘧啶在食管癌患者根治性放化疗中的比较。
Ann Oncol. 2014 Mar;25(3):638-643. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt589. Epub 2014 Feb 2.
6
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by esophagectomy does not increase morbidity in patients over 70.新辅助放化疗联合手术治疗并不增加 70 岁以上患者的发病率。
Dis Esophagus. 2013 Jul;26(5):510-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2012.01394.x. Epub 2012 Aug 23.
7
Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer.术前放化疗治疗食管或食管胃交界癌。
N Engl J Med. 2012 May 31;366(22):2074-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1112088.
8
Comparison of the 6th and 7th Editions of the UICC-AJCC TNM Classification for Esophageal Cancer.UICC-AJCC TNM 分期系统第 6 版与第 7 版比较——食管癌
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Jul;19(7):2142-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2218-5. Epub 2012 Mar 7.
9
Survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for resectable oesophageal carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis.可切除食管癌新辅助化疗或放化疗后的生存:更新的荟萃分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2011 Jul;12(7):681-92. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70142-5. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
10
Definitive chemoradiation for oesophageal cancer--a standard of care in patients with non-metastatic oesophageal cancer.根治性放化疗治疗食管癌--非转移性食管癌患者的标准治疗方法。
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2011 Apr;23(3):182-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2010.12.001. Epub 2011 Jan 12.