• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

八条目简明癌症治疗功能评估量表-乳房症状指数的测量特性及其与 37 条目母版的比较。

Measurement properties of the eight-item abbreviated functional assessment of cancer therapy--breast symptom index and comparison with its 37-item parent measure.

机构信息

Center for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013 Apr;45(4):782-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.03.012. Epub 2012 Aug 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.03.012
PMID:22926085
Abstract

CONTEXT

The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy--Breast Symptom Index (FBSI) is an eight-item instrument extracted from the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy--Breast (FACT-B). There has been no formal assessment of this eight-item version.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to examine the measurement properties of and comparability between the English and the Chinese versions of the FBSI and to compare it with its parent instrument, the FACT-B, in breast cancer patients in Singapore.

METHODS

This was an observational study of 271 breast cancer patients. Known-group validity of FBSI scores was assessed using four health indicators. Convergent and divergent validity was examined by correlation coefficients between the FBSI and the FACT-B. Responsiveness was assessed in relation to longitudinal changes in performance status. Test-retest reliability was evaluated by the intraclass correlation coefficient. Multiple regression analyses were performed to compare the scores on the two language versions. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were used for comparison between the FBSI and the FACT-B.

RESULTS

For both language versions, the FBSI demonstrated known-group validity, convergent and divergent validity, and sufficient test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.75-0.77). The English version was responsive to changes in performance status. The Chinese version was responsive to decline in performance status, but there was no conclusive evidence about its responsiveness to improvement in performance status. No practical significant difference was found in the outcomes between the two language versions despite minor difference in one item. The FBSI performed comparably with the FACT-B.

CONCLUSION

The English and Chinese versions of the FBSI are valid and reliable and provide comparable FBSI scores. The English version is responsive to change, whereas the responsiveness of the Chinese version warrants further study.

摘要

背景

癌症治疗功能评估-乳房症状指数(FBSI)是从癌症治疗功能评估-乳房(FACT-B)中提取的八项量表。尚未对这八项版本进行正式评估。

目的

本研究旨在检验 FBSI 的英文版和中文版的测量特性和可比性,并在新加坡的乳腺癌患者中与母表 FACT-B 进行比较。

方法

这是一项对 271 例乳腺癌患者的观察性研究。使用四个健康指标评估 FBSI 评分的已知组有效性。通过 FBSI 与 FACT-B 之间的相关系数来检验聚合和发散效度。通过与功能状态的纵向变化相关的反应性来评估反应性。通过组内相关系数评估测试-重测信度。进行多元回归分析比较两种语言版本的分数。通过接收者操作特征曲线分析比较 FBSI 和 FACT-B。

结果

对于两种语言版本,FBSI 均表现出已知组有效性、聚合和发散效度以及足够的测试-重测信度(组内相关系数=0.75-0.77)。英文版对功能状态的变化有反应。中文版对功能状态的下降有反应,但对功能状态的改善没有明确的反应证据。尽管在一个项目上存在细微差异,但两种语言版本的结果之间没有发现实际的显著差异。FBSI 的表现与 FACT-B 相当。

结论

FBSI 的英文版和中文版均有效且可靠,并提供可比的 FBSI 评分。英文版对变化有反应,而中文版的反应性需要进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Measurement properties of the eight-item abbreviated functional assessment of cancer therapy--breast symptom index and comparison with its 37-item parent measure.八条目简明癌症治疗功能评估量表-乳房症状指数的测量特性及其与 37 条目母版的比较。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013 Apr;45(4):782-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.03.012. Epub 2012 Aug 25.
2
Measurement properties of the English and Chinese versions of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) in Asian breast cancer patients.亚洲乳腺癌患者中癌症治疗功能评估-乳房(FACT-B)的英文和中文版本的测量特性。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Jan;131(2):619-25. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1764-z. Epub 2011 Sep 16.
3
Psychometric properties and measurement equivalence of the English and Chinese versions of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-cognitive in Asian patients with breast cancer.癌症治疗功能评估-认知量表的英文和中文版本在亚洲乳腺癌患者中的心理测量特性和测量等效性。
Value Health. 2013 Sep-Oct;16(6):1001-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.06.017.
4
The English and Chinese versions of the five-level EuroQoL Group's five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) were valid and reliable and provided comparable scores in Asian breast cancer patients.五水平欧洲生命质量五维问卷(EQ-5D)的英文和中文版本是有效且可靠的,并为亚洲乳腺癌患者提供了可比的评分。
Support Care Cancer. 2013 Jan;21(1):201-9. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1512-x. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
5
Validation of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Symptom Index (FBSI).癌症治疗功能评估-乳腺症状指数(FBSI)的验证
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005 Apr;90(3):295-8. doi: 10.1007/s10549-004-5024-3.
6
Measurement properties of the Chinese Version of the Kidney Disease Quality of Life-Short Form (KDQOL-SF™) in end-stage renal disease patients with poor prognosis in Singapore.新加坡预后不良的终末期肾病患者中,中文版肾脏病生活质量简表(KDQOL-SF™)的测量特性。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012 Dec;44(6):923-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.12.282. Epub 2012 Jul 13.
7
Priority symptoms in advanced breast cancer: development and initial validation of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network-Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer Symptom Index (NFBSI-16).晚期乳腺癌的优先症状:国家综合癌症网络-癌症治疗功能评估-乳腺癌症状指数(NFBSI-16)的制定和初步验证。
Value Health. 2012 Jan;15(1):183-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.08.1739. Epub 2011 Oct 26.
8
Spanish-language version of the MedRisk Instrument for Measuring Patient Satisfaction With Physical Therapy Care (MRPS): preliminary validation.用于衡量患者对物理治疗护理满意度的MedRisk工具(MRPS)的西班牙语版本:初步验证
Phys Ther. 2007 Jun;87(6):793-800. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20060313. Epub 2007 Apr 18.
9
Audit of Diabetes-Dependent Quality of Life (ADDQoL) [Chinese Version for Singapore] questionnaire: reliability and validity among Singaporeans with type 2 diabetes mellitus.糖尿病依存生命质量量表(ADDQoL)[新加坡中文版本]问卷的审核:新加坡 2 型糖尿病患者中的信度和效度。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2010;8(4):239-49. doi: 10.2165/11313920-000000000-00000.
10
Validity and reliability study on traditional Chinese FACT-C in Chinese patients with colorectal neoplasm.中医 FACT-C 在结直肠肿瘤患者中的有效性和可靠性研究。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2012 Dec;18(6):1186-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01753.x. Epub 2011 Aug 18.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for breast cancer patients who are undertaking adjuvant endocrine therapy.一项关于患者报告结局指标(PROMs)的系统评价,以评估接受辅助内分泌治疗的乳腺癌患者的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)。
Qual Life Res. 2025 Jun 18. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-04004-y.
2
Exploration of the methods of establishing the minimum clinical important difference based on anchors and their applications in the quality of life measurement scale QLICP-BR (V2.0) for breast cancer.基于锚定法建立最小临床重要差异的方法探索及其在乳腺癌生命质量测评量表QLICP-BR(V2.0)中的应用
Front Oncol. 2023 Mar 27;13:1123258. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1123258. eCollection 2023.
3
Health-related quality of life in women with breast cancer: a review of measures.乳腺癌患者的健康相关生活质量:评估工具的综述。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Jan 15;22(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-09157-w.
4
Patient-reported outcomes in breast cancer FDA drug labels and review documents.乳腺癌患者报告的结局在FDA药品标签和审评文件中。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2021 Apr 21;5(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s41687-021-00308-y.
5
Quality of Life in a Cohort of 1078 Women Diagnosed with Breast Cancer in Spain: 7-Year Follow-Up Results in the MCC-Spain Study.1078 例西班牙女性乳腺癌患者的生活质量:MCC-Spain 研究 7 年随访结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 13;17(22):8411. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228411.