Stearns Sally C, Rozier R Gary, Kranz Ashley M, Pahel Bhavna T, Quiñonez Rocio B
Department of Health Policy and Management, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012 Oct;166(10):945-51. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.797.
To estimate the cost-effectiveness of a medical office-based preventive oral health program in North Carolina called Into the Mouths of Babes (IMB).
Observational study using Medicaid claims data (2000-2006).
Medical staff delivered IMB services in medical offices, and dentists provided dental services in offices or hospitals.
A total of 209 285 children enrolled in Medicaid at age 6 months.
Into the Mouths of Babes visits included screening, parental counseling, topical fluoride application, and referral to dentists, if needed. The cost-effectiveness analysis used the Medicaid program perspective and a propensity score-matched sample with regression analysis to compare children with 4 or more vs 0 IMB visits.
Dental treatments and Medicaid payments for children up to age 6 years enabled assessment of the likelihood of whether IMB was cost-saving and, if not, the additional payments per hospital episode avoided.
Into the Mouths of Babes is 32% likely to be cost-saving, with discounting of benefits and payments. On average, IMB visits cost $11 more than reduced dental treatment payments per person. The program almost breaks even if future benefits from prevention are not discounted, and it would be cost-saving with certainty if IMB services could be provided at $34 instead of $55 per visit. The program is cost-effective with 95% certainty if Medicaid is willing to pay $2331 per hospital episode avoided.
Into the Mouths of Babes improves dental health for additional payments that can be weighed against unmeasured hospitalization costs.
评估北卡罗来纳州一项名为“关爱婴幼儿口腔健康”(IMB)的基于医疗办公室的预防性口腔健康项目的成本效益。
利用医疗补助索赔数据(2000 - 2006年)进行观察性研究。
医护人员在医疗办公室提供IMB服务,牙医在办公室或医院提供牙科服务。
共有209285名6个月大时参加医疗补助的儿童。
“关爱婴幼儿口腔健康”访视包括筛查、家长咨询、局部用氟,并在需要时转诊至牙医处。成本效益分析采用医疗补助项目视角,并使用倾向得分匹配样本及回归分析,比较接受4次或更多次与0次IMB访视的儿童。
对6岁以下儿童的牙科治疗及医疗补助支付情况进行评估,以确定IMB是否具有成本节约效益,若不具有,则评估每次避免的住院治疗额外支付费用。
考虑到效益和支付的贴现,“关爱婴幼儿口腔健康”项目有32%的可能性实现成本节约。平均而言,IMB访视每人的花费比减少的牙科治疗支付多11美元。如果不考虑预防带来的未来效益,该项目几乎收支平衡;如果每次IMB服务的费用为34美元而非55美元,则肯定具有成本节约效益。如果医疗补助愿意为每次避免的住院治疗支付2331美元,那么该项目在95%的置信度下具有成本效益。
“关爱婴幼儿口腔健康”项目在增加支付的情况下改善了口腔健康,这些支付可与未衡量的住院成本相权衡。