• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Charitè 腰椎间盘置换术中手术精度与临床结果的关系。

Relationship of surgical accuracy and clinical outcomes in Charitè lumbar disc replacement.

机构信息

Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Orthop Surg. 2012 Aug;4(3):145-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1757-7861.2012.00191.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1757-7861.2012.00191.x
PMID:22927148
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6583509/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To retrospectively assess the clinical and functional outcomes of a group of patients receiving Charitè lumbar disc replacement and to compare those outcomes to the corresponding surgical technical accuracy.

METHODS

A retrospective study of all patients treated over a 3-year period was undertaken. Objective pain scores were quantified from 1 to 10. Short Form 36-Health Survey (SF-36v2) scores were compared to Australian population norms. Surgical placements were radiographically classified. Heterotopic ossification, disc height restoration and angle-defined instability were assessed using established protocols.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were identified with three patients lost to follow-up. Average follow-up was 34 months. Ideal surgical placement was achieved in five (33%) single-level and three (37.5%) dual-level disc replacements. Sub-optimal surgical placement was seen in nine (60%) single-level and five (62.5%) dual-level disc replacements. Poor surgical placement was observed in a single-level disc replacement. All patients demonstrated a reduction in objective pain score (P < 0.05). SF-36v2 outcomes were superior in single-level compared to dual-level and ideal compared to sub-optimal replacements (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The hypothesis that ideal surgical placements are associated with improved clinical and functional outcomes in total lumbar disc replacement was confirmed.

摘要

目的

回顾性评估接受 Charitè 腰椎间盘置换术治疗的一组患者的临床和功能结果,并将这些结果与相应的手术技术准确性进行比较。

方法

对 3 年内接受治疗的所有患者进行回顾性研究。客观疼痛评分从 1 到 10 进行量化。使用澳大利亚人群标准比较了短格式 36 健康调查(SF-36v2)评分。对手术位置进行了放射学分类。使用既定方案评估异位骨化、椎间盘高度恢复和角度定义的不稳定性。

结果

确定了 25 名患者,其中 3 名患者失访。平均随访时间为 34 个月。在 5 例单节段(33%)和 3 例双节段(37.5%)椎间盘置换术中实现了理想的手术位置。在 9 例单节段(60%)和 5 例双节段(62.5%)椎间盘置换术中观察到次优的手术位置。在单个节段椎间盘置换术中观察到较差的手术位置。所有患者的客观疼痛评分均降低(P < 0.05)。单节段的 SF-36v2 结果优于双节段,理想的手术位置优于次优的手术位置(P < 0.05)。

结论

理想的手术位置与全腰椎间盘置换术的临床和功能改善结果相关的假设得到了证实。

相似文献

1
Relationship of surgical accuracy and clinical outcomes in Charitè lumbar disc replacement.Charitè 腰椎间盘置换术中手术精度与临床结果的关系。
Orthop Surg. 2012 Aug;4(3):145-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1757-7861.2012.00191.x.
2
A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part II: evaluation of radiographic outcomes and correlation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes.一项关于使用CHARITE人工椎间盘进行腰椎全椎间盘置换术与腰椎融合术对比的前瞻性、随机、多中心美国食品药品监督管理局研究器械豁免研究:第二部分:影像学结果评估及手术技术准确性与临床结果的相关性
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jul 15;30(14):1576-83; discussion E388-90. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000170561.25636.1c.
3
An 11-year minimum follow-up of the Charite III lumbar disc replacement for the treatment of symptomatic degenerative disc disease.对Charite III型腰椎间盘置换术治疗有症状的退行性椎间盘疾病进行至少11年的随访。
Eur Spine J. 2015 Sep;24(9):2056-64. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3939-5. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
4
A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part I: evaluation of clinical outcomes.一项关于使用CHARITE人工椎间盘进行腰椎全椎间盘置换与腰椎融合术的前瞻性、随机、多中心美国食品药品监督管理局研究性器械豁免研究:第一部分:临床结果评估。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jul 15;30(14):1565-75; discussion E387-91. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000170587.32676.0e.
5
Lumbar Total Disc Replacement by the Lateral Approach-Up to 10 Years Follow-Up.经外侧入路腰椎全椎间盘置换术——长达10年的随访
World Neurosurg. 2019 Feb;122:e325-e333. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.10.033. Epub 2018 Oct 13.
6
Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up.前瞻性、随机、多中心食品药品监督管理局关于CHARITE人工椎间盘与腰椎融合术治疗腰椎间盘置换的研究性器械豁免研究:五年随访
Spine J. 2009 May;9(5):374-86. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.08.007. Epub 2008 Sep 19.
7
Clinical and Radiological Mid-Term Outcomes of Lumbar Single-Level Total Disc Replacement.腰椎单节段全椎间盘置换的临床和放射学中期结果。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Jan 15;43(2):105-113. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182345aa2.
8
Influence of the Initial Sagittal Lumbar Alignment on Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Single-Level Lumbar Total Disc Replacements at a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.在至少 2 年的随访中,初始矢状位腰椎对线对单节段腰椎全椎间盘置换术的临床和影像学结果的影响。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Aug;43(16):E959-E967. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002606.
9
Comparison of 2 lumbar total disc replacements: results of a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter Food and Drug Administration trial with 24-month follow-up.两种腰椎全椎间盘置换的比较:一项前瞻性、随机、对照、多中心食品和药物管理局试验的结果,随访 24 个月。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 May 20;39(12):925-31. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000319.
10
Five-Year Follow-Up of a Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing Two Lumbar Total Disc Replacements.一项比较两种腰椎全椎间盘置换术的前瞻性随机试验的五年随访
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Jan;41(1):3-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001168.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of heterotopic ossification following lumbar total disk replacement: a systematic review.腰椎全椎间盘置换术后异位骨化的影响:系统评价。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Apr 23;23(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05322-9.
2
Novel use of robotics and navigation for anterior lumbar total disc replacement surgery.机器人技术和导航在腰椎前路全椎间盘置换手术中的新应用。
N Am Spine Soc J. 2022 Jan 5;9:100097. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2021.100097. eCollection 2022 Mar.
3
We Need to Talk about Lumbar Total Disc Replacement.我们需要谈谈腰椎全椎间盘置换术。
Int J Spine Surg. 2018 Aug 3;12(2):201-240. doi: 10.14444/5029. eCollection 2018 Apr.
4
Lumbar total disc arthroplasty: outdated surgery or here to stay procedure? A systematic review of current literature.腰椎全椎间盘置换术:过时的手术还是会持续存在的术式?对当前文献的系统评价
J Orthop Traumatol. 2017 Sep;18(3):197-215. doi: 10.1007/s10195-017-0462-y. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
5
ISASS Policy Statement - Lumbar Artificial Disc.国际脊柱侧弯研究学会政策声明 - 腰椎人工椎间盘
Int J Spine Surg. 2015 Mar 12;9:7. doi: 10.14444/2007. eCollection 2015.

本文引用的文献

1
The SF36 Version 2: critical analyses of population weights, scoring algorithms and population norms.《SF36 第二版:对总体权重、评分算法和总体规范的批判性分析》
Qual Life Res. 2007 May;16(4):661-73. doi: 10.1007/s11136-006-9154-4. Epub 2007 Feb 1.
2
Prevalence of heterotopic ossification following total disc replacement. A prospective, randomized study of two hundred and seventy-six patients.全椎间盘置换术后异位骨化的发生率。一项对276例患者的前瞻性随机研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Jan;89(1):82-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00432.
3
Disc arthroplasty in the management of the painful lumbar motion segment.椎间盘置换术在疼痛性腰椎活动节段治疗中的应用
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Aug 15;30(16 Suppl):S60-7. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000174511.66830.e9.
4
A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part II: evaluation of radiographic outcomes and correlation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes.一项关于使用CHARITE人工椎间盘进行腰椎全椎间盘置换术与腰椎融合术对比的前瞻性、随机、多中心美国食品药品监督管理局研究器械豁免研究:第二部分:影像学结果评估及手术技术准确性与临床结果的相关性
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jul 15;30(14):1576-83; discussion E388-90. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000170561.25636.1c.
5
A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part I: evaluation of clinical outcomes.一项关于使用CHARITE人工椎间盘进行腰椎全椎间盘置换与腰椎融合术的前瞻性、随机、多中心美国食品药品监督管理局研究性器械豁免研究:第一部分:临床结果评估。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jul 15;30(14):1565-75; discussion E387-91. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000170587.32676.0e.
6
Clinical and radiological outcomes with the Charité artificial disc: a 10-year minimum follow-up.Charité人工椎间盘的临床和影像学结果:至少10年的随访
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005 Aug;18(4):353-9. doi: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000172361.07479.6b.
7
Surgical technique of lumbar artificial disc replacement with the Charité artificial disc.使用Charité人工椎间盘进行腰椎人工椎间盘置换的手术技术
Neurosurgery. 2005 Jan;56(1 Suppl):46-57; discussion 46-57. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000153215.60994.d3.
8
Reliability of retrospective clinical data to evaluate the effectiveness of lumbar fusion in chronic low back pain.回顾性临床数据评估腰椎融合术治疗慢性下腰痛有效性的可靠性
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Feb 1;30(3):365-8. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000152096.48237.7c.
9
Prospective study evaluating total disc replacement: preliminary results.评估全椎间盘置换术的前瞻性研究:初步结果。
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003 Oct;16(5):450-4. doi: 10.1097/00024720-200310000-00003.
10
SB Charité disc replacement: report of 60 prospective randomized cases in a US center.柏林夏里特医院人工椎间盘置换术:美国一家中心60例前瞻性随机病例报告。
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003 Aug;16(4):424-33. doi: 10.1097/00024720-200308000-00016.