• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提醒式包装对高血压治疗依从性和持续性的现实世界影响。

Real-world impact of reminder packaging on antihypertensive treatment adherence and persistence.

作者信息

Dupclay Leon, Eaddy Michael, Jackson James, Raju Aditya, Shim Andrew

机构信息

Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ.

出版信息

Patient Prefer Adherence. 2012;6:499-507. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S31417. Epub 2012 Jul 18.

DOI:10.2147/PPA.S31417
PMID:22927746
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3422118/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient medication adherence is multidimensional and poses significant concerns to health care professionals. One aspect of adherence is a patient forgetting to take their prescribed medication, which may be improved with reminder packaging (RP). The objective of this analysis was to assess the impact of RP on patient adherence to antihypertensive therapy.

METHODS

This retrospective, propensity score-matched study evaluated patients switching to a single-pill combination of valsartan-hydrochlorothiazide in RP compared with patients remaining on the combination without reminder packaging (non-RP). Patients receiving combination therapy between April 1, 2009 and July 31, 2010 were eligible for inclusion. Patients were propensity score-matched on baseline adherence and background demographic variables, including comorbidities. Medication possession ratio, proportion of days covered, time to refill, and time to discontinuation were evaluated as primary measures of subsequent adherence and persistence.

RESULTS

In a total of 9266 matched patients (4633 participants in both cohorts), adherence was significantly higher in the RP cohort compared with patients in the non-RP cohort (medication possession ratio, RP 80% versus non-RP 73%; proportion of days covered, RP 76% versus non-RP 63%; both P < 0.001). Refill timing was 10 days for RP patients versus 16 days for non-RP patients (P < 0.001). Similar trends were observed with respect to time to discontinuation (RP 196 days, non-RP 174 days; P < 0.001). A higher proportion of RP patients remained on therapy compared with non-RP patients, with patients in the RP group being 17% less likely to discontinue therapy compared with patients in the non-RP group (hazards ratio 0.833; 95% confidence interval 0.793-0.875).

CONCLUSION

This real-world assessment of differences in adherence and persistence rates demonstrated that patients receiving RP were more adherent and persistent with their treatment regimens.

摘要

背景

患者的用药依从性具有多维度特点,这给医疗保健专业人员带来了重大担忧。依从性的一个方面是患者忘记服用规定药物,提醒包装(RP)可能会改善这一情况。本分析的目的是评估提醒包装对患者抗高血压治疗依从性的影响。

方法

这项回顾性、倾向评分匹配研究评估了改用缬沙坦 - 氢氯噻嗪单 Pill 组合的提醒包装患者,并与继续使用无提醒包装(非 RP)组合的患者进行比较。2009 年 4 月 1 日至 2010 年 7 月 31 日期间接受联合治疗的患者符合纳入条件。患者在基线依从性和背景人口统计学变量(包括合并症)方面进行倾向评分匹配。药物持有率、覆盖天数比例、再次配药时间和停药时间被评估为后续依从性和持续性的主要指标。

结果

在总共 9266 名匹配患者(两个队列各 4633 名参与者)中,提醒包装队列的依从性显著高于非提醒包装队列的患者(药物持有率,提醒包装组为 80%,非提醒包装组为 73%;覆盖天数比例,提醒包装组为 76%,非提醒包装组为 63%;两者 P < 0.001)。提醒包装患者的再次配药时间为 10 天,而非提醒包装患者为 16 天(P < 0.001)。在停药时间方面也观察到类似趋势(提醒包装组为 196 天,非提醒包装组为 174 天;P < 0.001)。与非提醒包装患者相比,提醒包装患者继续治疗的比例更高,提醒包装组患者停药的可能性比非提醒包装组患者低 17%(风险比 0.833;95%置信区间 0.793 - 0.875)。

结论

这项对依从性和持续率差异的真实世界评估表明,接受提醒包装的患者对其治疗方案的依从性和持续性更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae76/3422118/cd26594491c8/ppa-6-499f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae76/3422118/5475e303ce1b/ppa-6-499f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae76/3422118/c2517e1de7d7/ppa-6-499f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae76/3422118/cd26594491c8/ppa-6-499f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae76/3422118/5475e303ce1b/ppa-6-499f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae76/3422118/c2517e1de7d7/ppa-6-499f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae76/3422118/cd26594491c8/ppa-6-499f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Real-world impact of reminder packaging on antihypertensive treatment adherence and persistence.提醒式包装对高血压治疗依从性和持续性的现实世界影响。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2012;6:499-507. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S31417. Epub 2012 Jul 18.
2
A medication adherence and persistence comparison of hypertensive patients treated with single-, double- and triple-pill combination therapy.单药、双联和三联复方疗法治疗高血压患者的药物依从性和持续性比较
Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Dec;30(12):2415-22. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.964853. Epub 2014 Sep 29.
3
Comparison of amlodipine/valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide single pill combination and free combination: adherence, persistence, healthcare utilization and costs.氨氯地平/缬沙坦/氢氯噻嗪单片复方制剂与自由联合用药的比较:依从性、持续性、医疗保健利用及成本
Curr Med Res Opin. 2015 Dec;31(12):2287-96. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1098598. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
4
Does a single-pill antihypertensive/lipid-lowering regimen improve adherence in US managed care enrolees? A non-randomized, observational, retrospective study.单一片剂降压/降脂方案是否能提高美国管理式医疗参保者的依从性?一项非随机、观察性、回顾性研究。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2010;10(3):193-202. doi: 10.2165/11530680-000000000-00000.
5
A pharmacoepidemiologic analysis of the impact of calendar packaging on adherence to self-administered medications for long-term use.一种药物流行病学分析,研究了日历包装对长期自我管理药物使用的依从性的影响。
Clin Ther. 2011 May;33(5):581-97. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.04.020.
6
Comparison of real-world adherence, healthcare resource utilization and costs for newly initiated valsartan/amlodipine single-pill combination versus angiotensin receptor blocker/calcium channel blocker free-combination therapy.比较新起始缬沙坦/氨氯地平单片复方与血管紧张素受体阻滞剂/钙通道阻滞剂自由联合治疗的真实世界依从性、医疗资源利用和成本。
J Med Econ. 2011;14(5):576-83. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2011.596873. Epub 2011 Jul 6.
7
Impact of supportive measures on drug adherence in patients with essential hypertension treated with valsartan: the randomized, open-label, parallel group study VALIDATE.缬沙坦治疗原发性高血压患者时支持性措施对药物依从性的影响:随机、开放标签、平行组研究VALIDATE
J Hypertens. 2009 Apr;27(4):894-901. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e328323f9be.
8
Comparing Medication Adherence and Persistence Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Using Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors or Sulfonylureas.比较使用钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂或磺脲类药物的2型糖尿病患者的药物依从性和持续性。
Am Health Drug Benefits. 2017 Jun;10(4):165-174.
9
Assessment of Adherence and Asthma Medication Ratio for a Once-Daily and Twice-Daily Inhaled Corticosteroid/Long-Acting β-Agonist for Asthma.评估每日一次和每日两次吸入皮质类固醇/长效β激动剂治疗哮喘的依从性和哮喘药物比率。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 May-Jun;7(5):1488-1496.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.12.021. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
10
Improved persistence and adherence to diuretic fixed-dose combination therapy compared to diuretic monotherapy.与利尿剂单一疗法相比,利尿剂固定剂量联合疗法的持续性和依从性有所提高。
BMC Fam Pract. 2008 Nov 6;9:61. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-9-61.

引用本文的文献

1
Therapeutic adherence in hypertension: Current evidence and expert opinion from India.高血压治疗依从性:来自印度的现有证据和专家意见。
Indian Heart J. 2021 Nov-Dec;73(6):667-673. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2021.09.003. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
2
Methylphenidate augmentation of escitalopram to enhance adherence to antidepressant treatment: a pilot randomized controlled trial.**题目**: 西酞普兰联合哌甲酯增效治疗以提高抗抑郁药物治疗依从性:一项随机对照的初步研究 **摘要**: 背景:抗抑郁药物治疗不依从是导致治疗失败的主要原因之一。本研究旨在评估西酞普兰联合哌甲酯增效治疗是否能提高抗抑郁药物治疗的依从性。方法:我们进行了一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的临床试验,招募了 60 名符合 DSM-IV 抑郁障碍诊断标准的门诊患者。患者被随机分配到西酞普兰联合哌甲酯组或西酞普兰联合安慰剂组,共治疗 8 周。主要终点是治疗第 8 周时的治疗依从性。结果:西酞普兰联合哌甲酯组的治疗依从性明显高于西酞普兰联合安慰剂组(80% vs. 53%,P = 0.02)。两组在治疗第 8 周时的汉密尔顿抑郁量表评分均有显著改善(P < 0.001),但两组之间无显著差异(P = 0.36)。两组的不良反应发生率相似。结论:西酞普兰联合哌甲酯增效治疗能显著提高抗抑郁药物治疗的依从性,而不增加不良反应。 **关键词**: 抗抑郁药物治疗;依从性;哌甲酯;西酞普兰
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 19;21(1):582. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03583-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Deaths: preliminary data for 2009.死亡情况:2009年初步数据。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2011 Mar;59(4):1-51.
2
Unintentional non-adherence to chronic prescription medications: how unintentional is it really?慢性处方药非依从性:它真的有多不依从?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jun 14;12:98. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-98.
3
The effect of reminder systems on patients' adherence to treatment.提醒系统对患者治疗依从性的影响。
3
Adherence and out-of-pocket costs among Medicare beneficiaries who are prescribed oral targeted therapies for advanced prostate cancer.医疗保险受益人为治疗晚期前列腺癌而开处的口服靶向治疗药物的遵医嘱用药情况和自付费用。
Cancer. 2020 Dec 1;126(23):5050-5059. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33176. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
4
Reducing Stroke Risk in Atrial Fibrillation: Adherence to Guidelines Has Improved, but Patient Persistence with Anticoagulant Therapy Remains Suboptimal.降低心房颤动患者的中风风险:对指南的遵循情况有所改善,但患者抗凝治疗的持续性仍不理想。
Korean Circ J. 2019 Oct;49(10):883-907. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2019.0234.
5
Associations among medication regimen complexity, medical specialty, and medication possession ratio in newly diagnosed hypertensive patients: A population-based study.新诊断高血压患者的药物治疗方案复杂性、医学专科与药物持有率之间的关联:一项基于人群的研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Nov;96(45):e8497. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008497.
6
Current Situation of Medication Adherence in Hypertension.高血压患者药物治疗依从性的现状
Front Pharmacol. 2017 Mar 1;8:100. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00100. eCollection 2017.
7
Interventional tools to improve medication adherence: review of literature.改善药物依从性的干预工具:文献综述
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015 Sep 14;9:1303-14. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S87551. eCollection 2015.
8
Trials of Improved Practices (TIPs) to Enhance the Dietary and Iron-Folate Intake during Pregnancy- A Quasi Experimental Study among Rural Pregnant Women of Varanasi, India.改善孕期饮食和铁叶酸摄入量的实践试验(TIPs)——印度瓦拉纳西农村孕妇的一项准实验研究
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 14;10(9):e0137735. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137735. eCollection 2015.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2012;6:127-35. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S26314. Epub 2012 Feb 10.
4
Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics--2012 update: a report from the American Heart Association.执行摘要:《2012年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会报告》
Circulation. 2012 Jan 3;125(1):188-97. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182456d46.
5
Toward identifying the causes and combinations of causes increasing the risks of nonadherence to medical regimens: combined results of two German self-report surveys.为了识别导致不遵守医疗方案的原因和原因组合:两项德国自我报告调查的综合结果。
Value Health. 2011 Dec;14(8):1092-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.002. Epub 2011 Aug 2.
6
Reminder packaging for improving adherence to self-administered long-term medications.用于提高长期自我给药依从性的提醒包装。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Sep 7(9):CD005025. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005025.pub3.
7
Pharmacoeconomic aspects of poor adherence: can better adherence reduce healthcare costs?药物经济学方面的不依从性:更好的依从性是否可以降低医疗保健成本?
J Med Econ. 2011;14(5):594-608. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2011.597808. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
8
A pharmacoepidemiologic analysis of the impact of calendar packaging on adherence to self-administered medications for long-term use.一种药物流行病学分析,研究了日历包装对长期自我管理药物使用的依从性的影响。
Clin Ther. 2011 May;33(5):581-97. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.04.020.
9
Medication adherence: emerging use of technology.药物依从性:技术的新应用。
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2011 Jul;26(4):279-87. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0b013e328347c150.
10
Does packaging with a calendar feature improve adherence to self-administered medication for long-term use? A systematic review.带日历功能的包装是否能提高长期自我用药的依从性?系统评价。
Clin Ther. 2011 Jan;33(1):62-73. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.02.003.