Division of Experimental Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK.
Br J Cancer. 2012 Sep 25;107(7):1022-4. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.378. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
Patients recruited in phase I oncology trials are often treated at doses lower than the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and therefore may not receive the most efficacious dose available, despite their expectations to the contrary. This report investigates the consequences of allowing a patient choice of dose within a common dose-escalation scheme.
Trials using the continual reassessment method of dose escalation are simulated, with a modification of the rules to allow patients to choose a higher dose if they wish. The effect of allowing this choice is assessed in terms of probability of toxicity and probability of being treated at the MTD or higher.
The simulations show that allowing a patient choice of dose reduces the proportions of patients treated at doses lower than the MTD, and has little impact on the overall probability of correct identification of the MTD.
The results illustrate the principle that a choice of dose can be offered to patients in such trials without compromising the overall properties of the study.
在肿瘤学 I 期临床试验中招募的患者通常接受的剂量低于最大耐受剂量(MTD),因此尽管他们期望如此,但他们可能并未接受最有效的可用剂量。本报告调查了在常见的剂量递增方案中允许患者选择剂量的后果。
使用递增剂量的连续评估方法模拟试验,并修改规则以允许患者在希望时选择更高的剂量。允许这种选择的效果是根据毒性的概率和在 MTD 或更高剂量下治疗的概率来评估的。
模拟结果表明,允许患者选择剂量会降低低于 MTD 剂量治疗的患者比例,对正确确定 MTD 的总体概率影响不大。
结果说明了在这些试验中可以向患者提供剂量选择而不会影响研究的整体特性的原则。