• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

连续重新评估法:癌症一期临床试验的实用设计

Continual reassessment method: a practical design for phase 1 clinical trials in cancer.

作者信息

O'Quigley J, Pepe M, Fisher L

机构信息

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.

出版信息

Biometrics. 1990 Mar;46(1):33-48.

PMID:2350571
Abstract

This paper looks at a new approach to the design and analysis of Phase 1 clinical trials in cancer. The basic idea and motivation behind the approach stem from an attempt to reconcile the needs of dose-finding experimentation with the ethical demands of established medical practice. It is argued that for these trials the particular shape of the dose toxicity curve is of little interest. Attention focuses rather on identifying a dose with a given targeted toxicity level and on concentrating experimentation at that which all current available evidence indicates to be the best estimate of this level. Such an approach not only makes an explicit attempt to meet ethical requirements but also enables the use of models whose only requirements are that locally (i.e., around the dose corresponding to the targeted toxicity level) they reasonably well approximate the true probability of toxic response. Although a large number of models could be contemplated, we look at a particularly simple one. Extensive simulations show the model to have real promise.

摘要

本文探讨了癌症一期临床试验设计与分析的一种新方法。该方法背后的基本思想和动机源于试图协调剂量探索实验的需求与既定医疗实践的伦理要求。有人认为,对于这些试验,剂量毒性曲线的特定形状并不重要。注意力反而集中在确定具有给定目标毒性水平的剂量,并将实验集中在当前所有现有证据表明是该水平最佳估计值的剂量上。这种方法不仅明确尝试满足伦理要求,还能够使用仅要求在局部(即对应于目标毒性水平的剂量附近)合理近似毒性反应真实概率的模型。虽然可以考虑大量模型,但我们研究了一个特别简单的模型。广泛的模拟表明该模型具有真正的前景。

相似文献

1
Continual reassessment method: a practical design for phase 1 clinical trials in cancer.连续重新评估法:癌症一期临床试验的实用设计
Biometrics. 1990 Mar;46(1):33-48.
2
A comparison of model choices for the Continual Reassessment Method in phase I cancer trials.比较Ⅰ期癌症试验中连续评估方法的模型选择。
Stat Med. 2009 Oct 30;28(24):3012-28. doi: 10.1002/sim.3682.
3
[Continual reassessment method (CRM)].[连续重新评估法(CRM)]
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2000 Aug;27(9):1449-57.
4
Designs for group sequential phase II clinical trials.成组序贯II期临床试验设计
Biometrics. 1987 Dec;43(4):865-74.
5
Dose-finding in phase I clinical trials based on toxicity probability intervals.基于毒性概率区间的I期临床试验剂量探索
Clin Trials. 2007;4(3):235-44. doi: 10.1177/1740774507079442.
6
Designs for single- or multiple-agent phase I trials.单药或多药I期试验的设计。
Biometrics. 2004 Sep;60(3):661-9. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2004.00215.x.
7
[Methodological aspects on new protocols in oncology].[肿瘤学新方案的方法学方面]
Bull Cancer. 2008 Oct;95(10):979-83. doi: 10.1684/bdc.2008.0732.
8
Continual reassessment method: a likelihood approach.连续重新评估法:一种似然性方法。
Biometrics. 1996 Jun;52(2):673-84.
9
Anticancer Drug Development: The Way Forward.抗癌药物研发:前进之路
Oncologist. 1996;1(3):180-181.
10
Optimal designs for estimating the most successful dose.用于估计最有效剂量的最优设计。
Stat Med. 2006 Dec 30;25(24):4311-20. doi: 10.1002/sim.2685.

引用本文的文献

1
Using Dose-Escalation and -Expansion Cohort Study as Pivotal Trial for Targeted Anticancer Drug Approval.采用剂量递增和扩展队列研究作为靶向抗癌药物获批的关键试验。
JCO Precis Oncol. 2025 Aug;9:e2500253. doi: 10.1200/PO-25-00253. Epub 2025 Aug 1.
2
BARD: A seamless two-stage dose optimization design integrating backfill and adaptive randomization.BARD:一种整合回填和自适应随机化的无缝两阶段剂量优化设计。
Clin Trials. 2025 Jul 8:17407745251350596. doi: 10.1177/17407745251350596.
3
Accounting for Carryover Toxicity in Phase I Clinical Trials with Intra-Patient Dose Escalation.
在患者内剂量递增的I期临床试验中考虑残留毒性。
Stat Med. 2025 May;44(10-12):e70059. doi: 10.1002/sim.70059.
4
Younger Age Is Associated with Favorable Outcomes in Adult Dogs with Hemangiosarcoma Receiving Adjuvant Doxorubicin Chemotherapy: Results from the PRO-DOX Study.在接受多柔比星辅助化疗的成年血管肉瘤犬中,较年轻的年龄与良好预后相关:PRO-DOX研究结果
Res Sq. 2025 May 5:rs.3.rs-6573099. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6573099/v1.
5
UNITED: A Unified Transparent and Efficient Phase I/II Trial Design for Dose Optimization Accounting for Ordinal Graded, Continuous and Mixed Toxicity and Efficacy Endpoints.UNITED:一种统一、透明且高效的I/II期试验设计,用于考虑有序分级、连续及混合毒性和疗效终点的剂量优化。
Stat Med. 2025 May;44(10-12):e70098. doi: 10.1002/sim.70098.
6
Rethinking clinical trials for medical AI with dynamic deployments of adaptive systems.通过自适应系统的动态部署对医学人工智能的临床试验进行重新思考。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 May 6;8(1):252. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01674-3.
7
Design of a Phase I Drug Combination Study with Adaptive Allocation Based on Dose-Limiting Toxicity Attribution.基于剂量限制毒性归因的适应性分配的I期药物联合研究设计
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Mar 20;17(6):1038. doi: 10.3390/cancers17061038.
8
Positioning Imatinib for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Dose-Finding Phase 2 Study.伊马替尼用于肺动脉高压的定位:一项剂量探索性2期研究。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2025 Jun;211(6):1018-1027. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202410-1929OC.
9
Bayesian model averaging for randomized dose optimization trials in multiple indications.用于多适应症随机剂量优化试验的贝叶斯模型平均法。
J Biopharm Stat. 2025 Feb 10:1-13. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2025.2450325.
10
CFO: Calibration-Free Odds Bayesian Designs for Dose Finding in Clinical Trials.首席财务官:临床试验中剂量寻找的无校准概率贝叶斯设计。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2025 Feb;9:e2400184. doi: 10.1200/CCI-24-00184. Epub 2025 Jan 31.