Suppr超能文献

关于二分类中介变量非差异错误分类偏倚的分析结果。

Analytic results on the bias due to nondifferential misclassification of a binary mediator.

机构信息

Program on Causal Inference, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02116, USA.

出版信息

Am J Epidemiol. 2012 Sep 15;176(6):555-61. doi: 10.1093/aje/kws131. Epub 2012 Aug 28.

Abstract

Consider a study in which the effect of a binary exposure on an outcome operates partly through a binary mediator but measurement of the mediator is nondifferentially misclassified. Suppose that an investigator wishes to estimate the direct and indirect effects of the exposure on the outcome. In this paper, the authors describe a mathematical correspondence between the empirical expressions for the natural direct effect and the effect of exposure among the unexposed standardized by a binary confounder. They then exploit this correspondence to prove that the direction of the bias due to nondifferential measurement error in estimating the natural direct and indirect effects is to overestimate the natural direct effect and underestimate the natural indirect effect.

摘要

考虑一项研究,其中二元暴露对结果的影响部分通过二元中介起作用,但中介的测量存在非差异错误分类。假设研究人员希望估计暴露对结果的直接和间接影响。在本文中,作者描述了经验表达式之间的数学对应关系自然直接效应和暴露在未暴露的暴露之间的效应标准化通过二元混杂因素。然后,他们利用这种对应关系证明了由于自然直接和间接效应估计中的非差异测量误差而导致的偏差的方向是高估自然直接效应和低估自然间接效应。

相似文献

6
Mediation analysis with multiple versions of the mediator.中介分析与多个版本的中介。
Epidemiology. 2012 May;23(3):454-63. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31824d5fe7.
7
Misclassification of the mediator matters when estimating indirect effects.当估计间接效应时,调解者的错误分类很重要。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013 May;67(5):458-66. doi: 10.1136/jech-2012-201813. Epub 2013 Mar 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Practical challenges in mediation analysis: a guide for applied researchers.中介分析中的实际挑战:应用研究人员指南
Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol. 2025;25(1):57-84. doi: 10.1007/s10742-024-00327-4. Epub 2024 Apr 12.

本文引用的文献

2
Odds ratios for mediation analysis for a dichotomous outcome.二分类结局中介分析的优势比。
Am J Epidemiol. 2010 Dec 15;172(12):1339-48. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq332. Epub 2010 Oct 29.
6
The sign of the bias of unmeasured confounding.未测量混杂因素的偏倚迹象。
Biometrics. 2008 Sep;64(3):702-706. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00957.x. Epub 2007 Dec 31.
8
A rating scale for depression.一种抑郁症评定量表。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960 Feb;23(1):56-62. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56.
9
The effect of misclassification in the presence of covariates.存在协变量时错误分类的影响。
Am J Epidemiol. 1980 Oct;112(4):564-9. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113025.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验