Suppr超能文献

非机器人:儿童对真实性、道德代理和兴奋剂药物治疗的看法。

Not robots: children's perspectives on authenticity, moral agency and stimulant drug treatments.

机构信息

Department of Social Science, Health and Medicine, King's College London, King's Building, Strand, London WC2R 2L, UK.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2013 Jun;39(6):359-66. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100224. Epub 2012 Aug 28.

Abstract

In this article, I examine children's reported experiences with stimulant drug treatments for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in light of bioethical arguments about the potential threats of psychotropic drugs to authenticity and moral agency. Drawing on a study that involved over 150 families in the USA and the UK, I show that children are able to report threats to authenticity, but that the majority of children are not concerned with such threats. On balance, children report that stimulants improve their capacity for moral agency, and they associate this capacity with an ability to meet normative expectations. I argue that although under certain conditions stimulant drug treatment may increase the risk of a threat to authenticity, there are ways to minimise this risk and to maximise the benefits of stimulant drug treatment. Medical professionals in particular should help children to flourish with stimulant drug treatments, in good and in bad conditions.

摘要

在本文中,我根据关于精神药物对真实性和道德代理的潜在威胁的生物伦理论点,考察了儿童对注意力缺陷多动障碍的兴奋剂药物治疗的报告体验。该研究涉及美国和英国的 150 多个家庭,我表明,儿童能够报告真实性受到威胁,但大多数儿童并不关心此类威胁。总的来说,儿童报告说兴奋剂提高了他们的道德代理能力,他们将这种能力与满足规范期望的能力联系起来。我认为,尽管在某些情况下,兴奋剂药物治疗可能会增加真实性受到威胁的风险,但有办法降低这种风险,并使兴奋剂药物治疗的益处最大化。医疗专业人员尤其应该帮助儿童在良好和恶劣的条件下通过兴奋剂药物治疗茁壮成长。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55fa/3664392/0f2ef59e775a/medethics-2011-100224f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Not robots: children's perspectives on authenticity, moral agency and stimulant drug treatments.
J Med Ethics. 2013 Jun;39(6):359-66. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100224. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
2
Commentary on Singh: Not robots: children's perspectives on authenticity, moral agency and stimulant drug treatments.
J Med Ethics. 2013 Jun;39(6):371; discussion 372-3. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100961. Epub 2012 Nov 9.
3
Might stimulant drugs support moral agency in ADHD children?
J Med Ethics. 2013 Jun;39(6):369-70; discussion 372-3. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100846. Epub 2012 Sep 21.
4
ADHD and stimulant drug treatment: what can the children teach us?
J Med Ethics. 2013 Jun;39(6):357-8. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101562.
5
Accepting a helping hand can be the right thing to do.
J Med Ethics. 2013 Jun;39(6):367-8; discussion 372-3. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100879. Epub 2012 Sep 1.
7
Clinical implications of ethical concepts: moral self-understandings in children taking methylphenidate for ADHD.
Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2007 Apr;12(2):167-82. doi: 10.1177/1359104507075920.
8
Trends in Stimulant Medication Use in Commercially Insured Youths and Adults, 2010-2014.
JAMA Psychiatry. 2016 Sep 1;73(9):992-3. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.1182.
9
Practice parameter for the use of stimulant medications in the treatment of children, adolescents, and adults.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2002 Feb;41(2 Suppl):26S-49S. doi: 10.1097/00004583-200202001-00003.
10
Methylphenidate improves response inhibition but not reflection-impulsivity in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2009 Mar;203(1):185-6, author reply 187. doi: 10.1007/s00213-008-1386-2. Epub 2009 Jan 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Making psychiatry moral again: the role of psychiatry in patient moral development.
J Med Ethics. 2023 Jun;49(6):423-427. doi: 10.1136/jme-2022-108442. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
2
Memory Modification and Authenticity: A Narrative Approach.
Neuroethics. 2022;15(1):10. doi: 10.1007/s12152-022-09489-9. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
3
Losing Meaning: Philosophical Reflections on Neural Interventions and their Influence on Narrative Identity.
Neuroethics. 2021;14(3):491-505. doi: 10.1007/s12152-021-09469-5. Epub 2021 May 15.
5
How do drugs for psychiatric disorders work?
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2018 Apr;27(2):141-142. doi: 10.1017/S204579601700066X. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
6
Towards a broader understanding of agency in biomedical ethics.
Med Health Care Philos. 2016 Sep;19(3):475-83. doi: 10.1007/s11019-016-9706-5.
7
Do we understand children's restlessness? Constructing ecologically valid understandings through reflexive cooperation.
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2015 Dec 21;10:29292. doi: 10.3402/qhw.v10.29292. eCollection 2015.
8
Enhancement, ethics and society: towards an empirical research agenda for the medical humanities and social sciences.
Med Humanit. 2015 Dec;41(2):136-42. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2015-010718. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
9
Medicalization and epistemic injustice.
Med Health Care Philos. 2015 Aug;18(3):341-52. doi: 10.1007/s11019-014-9608-3.

本文引用的文献

2
A disorder of anger and aggression: children's perspectives on attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder in the UK.
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Sep;73(6):889-96. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.03.049. Epub 2011 May 18.
3
A three-country comparison of psychotropic medication prevalence in youth.
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2008 Sep 25;2(1):26. doi: 10.1186/1753-2000-2-26.
4
The worldwide prevalence of ADHD: a systematic review and metaregression analysis.
Am J Psychiatry. 2007 Jun;164(6):942-8. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2007.164.6.942.
5
The global market for ADHD medications.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Mar-Apr;26(2):450-7. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.2.450.
7
Will the "real boy" please behave: dosing dilemmas for parents of boys with ADHD.
Am J Bioeth. 2005 Summer;5(3):34-47. doi: 10.1080/15265160590945129.
8
[Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder prevalence in an inner city elementary school].
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2003 Mar;61(1):67-73. doi: 10.1590/s0004-282x2003000100012. Epub 2003 Apr 16.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验