Suppr超能文献

记忆修改与真实性:一种叙事方法。

Memory Modification and Authenticity: A Narrative Approach.

作者信息

Leuenberger Muriel

机构信息

Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford, Suite 8 Littlegate House, 16/17 St Ebbe's Street, Oxford, OX1 1PT UK.

出版信息

Neuroethics. 2022;15(1):10. doi: 10.1007/s12152-022-09489-9. Epub 2022 Feb 16.

Abstract

The potential of memory modification techniques (MMTs) has raised concerns and sparked a debate in neuroethics, particularly in the context of identity and authenticity. This paper addresses the question whether and how MMTs influence authenticity. I proceed by drawing two distinctions within the received views on authenticity. From this, I conclude that an analysis of MMTs based on a dual-basis, process view of authenticity is warranted, which implies that the influence of MMTs on authenticity crucially depends on the specifics of how memory modification would eventually work. Therefore, I continue with a systematic analysis of possible properties of MMTs in which I distinguish between the dimensions of memories and the kinds of experiences that can be modified as well as the properties of the process of memory modification. The impact of MMTs on authenticity is analyzed regarding the possible properties of MMTs and based on a narrative approach to authenticity which fulfills the requirements of a dual-basis, process view of authenticity. Lastly, I explore the potential of MMTs to shift the balance between self-discovery and self-creation within authenticity and thereby alter the concept itself as well as the value of authenticity.

摘要

记忆修改技术(MMTs)的潜力引发了人们的关注,并在神经伦理学领域引发了一场辩论,尤其是在身份和真实性的背景下。本文探讨了MMTs是否以及如何影响真实性的问题。我通过在关于真实性的既有观点中进行两种区分来展开论述。由此,我得出结论,有必要基于真实性的双重基础、过程视角对MMTs进行分析,这意味着MMTs对真实性的影响关键取决于记忆修改最终如何起作用的具体细节。因此,我接着对MMTs可能具有的属性进行系统分析,在分析中我区分了记忆的维度、可被修改的体验类型以及记忆修改过程的属性。基于MMTs的可能属性,并依据一种满足双重基础、过程视角真实性要求的真实性叙事方法,分析了MMTs对真实性的影响。最后,我探讨了MMTs在真实性范围内改变自我发现与自我创造之间平衡的潜力,从而改变真实性这一概念本身及其价值。

相似文献

1
Memory Modification and Authenticity: A Narrative Approach.记忆修改与真实性:一种叙事方法。
Neuroethics. 2022;15(1):10. doi: 10.1007/s12152-022-09489-9. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
4
Does Memory Modification Threaten Our Authenticity?记忆修改会威胁到我们的本真性吗?
Neuroethics. 2011 Nov;4(3):235-249. doi: 10.1007/s12152-010-9090-4. Epub 2010 Sep 1.
6
Authenticity and inauthenticity in narrative identity.叙事身份中的真实性与非真实性。
Heliyon. 2019 Jul 31;5(7):e02178. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02178. eCollection 2019 Jul.

本文引用的文献

6
Memory, Authenticity, and Optogenethics.记忆、真实性与光遗传学伦理
AJOB Neurosci. 2021 Jan;12(1):30-32. doi: 10.1080/21507740.2020.1866102.
9
Saving Elizabeth: Radical Control & the Puzzle of Authenticity.
AJOB Neurosci. 2021 Jan;12(1):24-26. doi: 10.1080/21507740.2020.1866100.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验