Blumberg N, Heal J M
Department of Pathology, University of Rochester Medical Center, New York.
Yale J Biol Med. 1990 Sep-Oct;63(5):429-33.
Over the last decade, it has become evident that homologous transfusions carry immunologic consequences beyond the well-understood ones of alloimmunization to blood cell antigens. Transfusions constitute temporary transplants of large amounts of allogeneic antigen given intravenously and cause down-regulation of many cellular immune functions. These changes may explain in part the association of transfusion with such clinically important events as (1) improved survival of renal allografts, (2) decreased recurrence rates for autoimmune disease, (3) increased frequency and earlier recurrences of solid tumors, (4) increased frequency of post-operative bacterial infection, and (5) increased severity of viral infection. Preliminary data suggest that, in animal models and clinical settings, syngeneic or autologous transfusions are not associated with such events. This finding supports the hypothesis that these associations are cause and effect and involve immunologic mechanisms.
在过去十年中,有一点已经变得很明显,即同源输血所带来的免疫后果,超出了人们对血细胞抗原同种免疫的熟知范围。输血相当于大量异体抗原的静脉临时移植,并导致许多细胞免疫功能下调。这些变化可能部分解释了输血与以下这些临床重要事件之间的关联:(1)肾移植存活率提高;(2)自身免疫性疾病复发率降低;(3)实体瘤复发频率增加且复发时间提前;(4)术后细菌感染频率增加;(5)病毒感染严重程度增加。初步数据表明,在动物模型和临床环境中,同基因或自体输血与这些事件无关。这一发现支持了这样一种假设,即这些关联是因果关系,且涉及免疫机制。