Douglas College, PO Box 2503, New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada V3L 5B2.
Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Jan;34(1):11-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2012.08.003. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
Only a few studies have compared the convergent validity of the Questions About Behavioral Function (QABF) scale to the results of functional analyses (FA). In the current study, six participants who emitted problem behaviors participated in either a brief, or a no-interaction-series FA, while each participant's parent completed the QABF. The results of the study showed that for five participants, the QABF and the FA identified the same non-social function. For one participant, the QABF and FA identified potentially dual functions. Based on our findings, we suggest that the QABF could be embedded within a five-step functional assessment protocol.
仅有少数研究比较了行为功能问卷（QABF）与功能分析（FA）结果的会聚效度。在本研究中，六名表现出问题行为的参与者参加了简短或无交互序列的 FA，同时每位参与者的家长完成了 QABF。研究结果表明，对于五名参与者，QABF 和 FA 确定了相同的非社会功能。对于一名参与者，QABF 和 FA 确定了潜在的双重功能。基于我们的发现，我们建议 QABF 可以嵌入到五步功能评估方案中。
