Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Nov 1;82(5):838-45. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24643. Epub 2013 Mar 25.
We compared the efficacy and safety of alcohol septal ablation (ASA) for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) in young, middle-aged, and elderly patients.
Intersociety guidelines suggest based on limited evidence that young patients with medically refractory symptoms of obstructive HCM should undergo surgical myectomy while elderly patients may be more appropriate for ASA.
Data for 360 patients undergoing 389 ASAs were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed according to age.
Young (<45 years), middle-aged (45-64 years), and elderly (≥65 years) patients comprised 28, 40, and 32% of the study population, respectively. Young patients had thicker left ventricular septal walls at baseline, and elderly patients had more comorbidity and dyspnea. Resting, mean left ventricular outflow tract gradients (LVOTGs) were similar across the age groups at baseline (62, 66, and 68 mm Hg, respectively; P = NS for all comparisons). LVOTGs and dyspnea were significantly and similarly improved in all age groups immediately after ASA and through 12 months of follow-up (P < 0.001 for before and after comparisons; P = NS for intergroup comparisons). Complication rates were similar for young and middle-aged patients but higher for elderly patients (9.1 and 6.3% vs. 20.8%, respectively; P ≤ 0.016 for elderly vs. others). Mortality rates for young and middle-aged patients were lower than for elderly patients, but the differences were not statistically significant.
Patients undergoing ASA had significant and similar improvements in LVOTGs and symptoms regardless of age. Procedural complications were increased in elderly patients, who had numerically but not statistically significantly higher mortality rates.
我们比较了酒精室间隔消融术(ASA)治疗梗阻性肥厚型心肌病(HCM)在年轻、中年和老年患者中的疗效和安全性。
多学会指南根据有限的证据建议,对于有药物难治性梗阻性 HCM 症状的年轻患者,应进行手术心肌切除术,而对于老年患者,ASA 可能更为合适。
根据年龄,前瞻性收集了 360 例接受 389 次 ASA 的患者的数据,并进行了回顾性分析。
年轻(<45 岁)、中年(45-64 岁)和老年(≥65 岁)患者分别占研究人群的 28%、40%和 32%。年轻患者的左心室间隔壁在基线时更厚,老年患者的合并症和呼吸困难更多。基线时,各组间静息时平均左心室流出道梯度(LVOTG)相似(分别为 62、66 和 68mmHg;所有比较均为 P = NS)。ASA 后即刻及 12 个月随访时,所有年龄组的 LVOTG 和呼吸困难均显著且相似地改善(P < 0.001 用于前后比较;P = NS 用于组间比较)。年轻和中年患者的并发症发生率相似,但老年患者的并发症发生率较高(分别为 9.1%和 6.3%比 20.8%;P ≤ 0.016 用于老年与其他患者比较)。年轻和中年患者的死亡率低于老年患者,但差异无统计学意义。
无论年龄大小,接受 ASA 的患者 LVOTG 和症状均有显著且相似的改善。老年患者的手术并发症增加,死亡率虽有增加但无统计学意义。