AdverseEvents, Inc, Healdsburg, California, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42866. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042866. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
Cholesterol management drugs known as statins are widely used and often well tolerated; however, a variety of muscle-related side effects can arise. These adverse events (AEs) can have serious impact, and form a significant barrier to therapy adherence. Surveillance of post-marketing AEs is of vital importance to understand real-world AEs and reporting differences between individual statin drugs. We conducted a review of post-approval muscle and tendon AE reports in association with statin use, to assess differences within the drug class.
We analyzed all case reports from the FDA AE Reporting System (AERS) database linking muscle-related AEs to statin use (07/01/2005-03/31/2011). Drugs examined were: atorvastatin, simvastatin, lovastatin, pravastatin, rosuvastatin, and fluvastatin.
Relative risk rates for rosuvastatin were consistently higher than other statins. Atorvastatin and simvastatin showed intermediate risks, while pravastatin and lovastatin appeared to have the lowest risk rates. Relative risk of muscle-related AEs, therefore, approximately tracked with per milligram LDL-lowering potency, with fluvastatin an apparent exception. Incorporating all muscle categories, rates for atorvastatin, simvastatin, pravastatin, and lovastatin were, respectively, 55%, 26%, 17%, and 7.5% as high, as rosuvastatin, approximately tracking per milligram potency (Rosuvastatin>Atorvastatin>Simvastatin>Pravastatin ≈ Lovastatin) and comporting with findings of other studies. Relative potency, therefore, appears to be a fundamental predictor of muscle-related AE risk, with fluvastatin, the least potent statin, an apparent exception (risk 74% vs rosuvastatin).
AE reporting rates differed strikingly for drugs within the statin class, with relative reporting aligning substantially with potency. The data presented in this report offer important reference points for the selection of statins for cholesterol management in general and, especially, for the rechallenge of patients who have experienced muscle-related AEs (for whom agents of lower expected potency should be preferred).
作为一种被广泛使用且通常具有良好耐受性的胆固醇管理药物,他汀类药物可能会引起各种与肌肉相关的副作用。这些不良反应(AE)可能会产生严重影响,并成为治疗依从性的重大障碍。监测上市后 AE 对于了解真实世界中的 AE 和报告不同他汀类药物之间的差异至关重要。我们对与他汀类药物使用相关的肌肉和肌腱 AE 报告进行了审查,以评估药物类别内的差异。
我们分析了 FDA 不良事件报告系统(AERS)数据库中所有与肌肉相关 AE 相关的他汀类药物使用病例报告(2005 年 7 月 1 日至 2011 年 3 月 31 日)。所检查的药物为:阿托伐他汀、辛伐他汀、洛伐他汀、普伐他汀、瑞舒伐他汀和氟伐他汀。
与其他他汀类药物相比,瑞舒伐他汀的相对风险率一直较高。阿托伐他汀和辛伐他汀显示出中等风险,而普伐他汀和洛伐他汀似乎风险率最低。因此,肌肉相关 AE 的相对风险大致与每毫克 LDL 降低效力相关,氟伐他汀是一个明显的例外。纳入所有肌肉类别,阿托伐他汀、辛伐他汀、普伐他汀和洛伐他汀的肌肉相关 AE 发生率分别为瑞舒伐他汀的 55%、26%、17%和 7.5%,大致与每毫克效力相关(瑞舒伐他汀>阿托伐他汀>辛伐他汀>普伐他汀≈洛伐他汀),与其他研究的结果一致。因此,相对效力似乎是肌肉相关 AE 风险的基本预测因素,而氟伐他汀(效力最低的他汀类药物)是一个明显的例外(风险比瑞舒伐他汀高 74%)。
他汀类药物中药物的 AE 报告率差异显著,相对报告率与效力密切相关。本报告提供的重要参考数据,可用于一般胆固醇管理中选择他汀类药物,特别是用于经历肌肉相关 AE 的患者(对于这些患者,应首选预期效力较低的药物)。