• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

理解卫生系统、卫生经济和全球化:需要社会科学视角。

Understanding health systems, health economies and globalization: the need for social science perspectives.

机构信息

King’s College London, 57 Waterloo Road, London SE1 8WA, UK.

出版信息

Global Health. 2012 Aug 31;8:30. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-8-30.

DOI:10.1186/1744-8603-8-30
PMID:22938504
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3544147/
Abstract

The complex relationship between globalization and health calls for research from many disciplinary and methodological perspectives. This editorial gives an overview of the content trajectory of the interdisciplinary journal 'Globalization and Health' over the first six years of production, 2005 to 2010. The findings show that bio-medical and population health perspectives have been dominant but that social science perspectives have become more evident in recent years. The types of paper published have also changed, with a growing proportion of empirical studies. A special issue on 'Health systems, health economies and globalization: social science perspectives' is introduced, a collection of contributions written from the vantage points of economics, political science, psychology, sociology, business studies, social policy and research policy. The papers concern a range of issues pertaining to the globalization of healthcare markets and governance and regulation issues. They highlight the important contribution that can be made by the social sciences to this field, and also the practical and methodological challenges implicit in the study of globalization and health.

摘要

全球化与健康之间的复杂关系需要从许多学科和方法的角度进行研究。本社论概述了跨学科期刊《全球化与健康》在 2005 年至 2010 年的前六年制作过程中的内容轨迹。研究结果表明,生物医学和人口健康视角一直占据主导地位,但近年来社会科学视角变得更加明显。发表的论文类型也发生了变化,实证研究的比例不断增加。介绍了一期关于“卫生系统、卫生经济与全球化:社会科学视角”的特刊,其中收录了从经济学、政治学、心理学、社会学、商业研究、社会政策和研究政策的角度撰写的一系列文章。这些文章涉及与医疗保健市场全球化和治理与监管问题相关的一系列问题。它们强调了社会科学可以为这一领域做出的重要贡献,也突出了全球化与健康研究中隐含的实际和方法挑战。

相似文献

1
Understanding health systems, health economies and globalization: the need for social science perspectives.理解卫生系统、卫生经济和全球化:需要社会科学视角。
Global Health. 2012 Aug 31;8:30. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-8-30.
2
The Political Economy of Healthy and Sustainable Food Systems: An Introduction to a Special Issue.健康可持续食物系统的政治经济学:特刊引言
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021 Nov 1;10(12):734-744. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.156.
3
Understanding India, globalisation and health care systems: a mapping of research in the social sciences.理解印度、全球化和医疗保健系统:社会科学研究的映射。
Global Health. 2012 Sep 10;8:32. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-8-32.
4
Unpacking cosmopolitanism for the social sciences: a research agenda.为社会科学剖析世界主义:一项研究议程。
Br J Sociol. 2006 Mar;57(1):1-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2006.00091.x.
5
The growing impact of globalization for health and public health practice.全球化对健康和公共卫生实践的影响日益增大。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2011;32:263-83. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031210-101225.
6
What have the social sciences ever done for equity in health policy and health systems?社会科学在卫生政策和卫生系统中的公平性方面有何作为?
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Sep 24;17(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0842-9.
7
Social values and health policy: a new international research programme.社会价值与健康政策:一项新的国际研究计划。
J Health Organ Manag. 2012;26(3):285-92. doi: 10.1108/14777261211238945.
8
Showcasing the contribution of social sciences to health policy and systems research.展示社会科学对卫生政策和体系研究的贡献。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Sep 24;17(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0862-5.
9
Unpacking cosmopolitanism for the social sciences: a research agenda. 2006.为社会科学领域的世界主义研究:一个研究议程。2006 年。
Br J Sociol. 2010 Jan;61 Suppl 1:381-403. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2009.01250.x.
10
Reprising the globalization dimensions of international health.重温国际卫生的全球化维度。
Global Health. 2018 May 18;14(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12992-018-0368-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Inter-Country Doctor-to-Doctor Telemedicine Conferences/Consultations Following COVID-19: A Survey of the National University Hospital Council of Japan.新冠疫情后日本国立大学医院理事会的跨国医生对医生远程医疗会议/会诊调查
Telemed Rep. 2025 May 20;6(1):148-161. doi: 10.1089/tmr.2025.0015. eCollection 2025.
2
[The odysseys of Ulysses. A study of tales in a normal working day of the family doctor in Paraguay, Mexico, Peru, and Spain].[尤利西斯的奥德赛之旅。对巴拉圭、墨西哥、秘鲁和西班牙家庭医生正常工作日里的故事研究]
Aten Primaria. 2014 Feb;46(2):68-76. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2013.07.003. Epub 2013 Oct 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding India, globalisation and health care systems: a mapping of research in the social sciences.理解印度、全球化和医疗保健系统:社会科学研究的映射。
Global Health. 2012 Sep 10;8:32. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-8-32.
2
Globalization and its methodological discontents: Contextualizing globalization through the study of HIV/AIDS.全球化及其方法论不满:通过对 HIV/AIDS 的研究来理解全球化。
Global Health. 2011 Aug 23;7:29. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-7-29.
3
Globalisation of birth markets: a case study of assisted reproductive technologies in India.生育市场全球化:印度辅助生殖技术的案例研究。
Global Health. 2011 Aug 12;7:27. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-7-27.
4
Understanding multinational companies in public health systems, using a competitive advantage framework.理解公共卫生系统中的跨国公司,使用竞争优势框架。
Global Health. 2011 Jul 1;7:19. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-7-19.
5
How is Telemedicine perceived? A qualitative study of perspectives from the UK and India.远程医疗如何被感知?来自英国和印度的定性研究视角。
Global Health. 2011 May 20;7:17. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-7-17.
6
Medical tourism and policy implications for health systems: a conceptual framework from a comparative study of Thailand, Singapore and Malaysia.医疗旅游与卫生系统政策关联:以泰国、新加坡和马来西亚的比较研究为基础的概念性框架
Global Health. 2011 May 4;7:12. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-7-12.
7
The potential for bi-lateral agreements in medical tourism: A qualitative study of stakeholder perspectives from the UK and India.双边协议在医疗旅游中的潜力:来自英国和印度利益相关者观点的定性研究。
Global Health. 2011 May 3;7:11. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-7-11.
8
European health research and globalisation: is the public-private balance right?欧洲健康研究与全球化:公私平衡得当吗?
Global Health. 2011 Mar 22;7:5. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-7-5.
9
Can NGOs regulate medicines markets? Social enterprise in wholesaling, and access to essential medicines.非政府组织能否规范药品市场?社会企业在药品批发领域的作用,以及获取基本药物的途径。
Global Health. 2011 Feb 28;7:4. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-7-4.
10
State strategies of governance in biomedical innovation: aligning conceptual approaches for understanding 'Rising Powers' in the global context.国家在生物医学创新方面的治理策略:在全球背景下协调理解“新兴大国”的概念方法。
Global Health. 2011 Feb 24;7:3. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-7-3.