• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

法国多中心队列中贲门失弛缓症的芝加哥分类。

The Chicago classification for achalasia in a French multicentric cohort.

机构信息

Hospices Civils de Lyon, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Digestive Physiology, Lyon F-69437, France.

出版信息

Dig Liver Dis. 2012 Dec;44(12):976-80. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2012.07.019. Epub 2012 Aug 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.dld.2012.07.019
PMID:22938702
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Achalasia is divided into 3 subtypes using the Chicago classification for high-resolution manometry. Aim of this study was to apply this classification to a multicentric French cohort of achalasia and to compare clinical and manometric characteristics between the 3 subtypes.

METHODS

Oesophageal symptoms were collected in a retrospective study of patients diagnosed with achalasia on high-resolution manometry. Manometry data were analyzed with oesophago-gastric junction resting and relaxation pressures, and upper oesophageal sphincter resting pressure. Achalasia was classified according to the Chicago classification.

RESULTS

From 2007 to August 2011, achalasia was diagnosed in 169 patients, 14% classified as type I, 70% as type II and 16% as type III. Type III patients were older than types I and II (62 years vs. 52, p = 0.03). Ninety five percent of patients complained of dysphagia, 16% of chest pain (no difference between the 3 subtypes); 50% of type I patients presented regurgitations compared to 33% of type II and 22% of type III (p = 0.10). Oesophago-gastric junction and upper oesophageal sphincter pressures did not differ between the 3 groups.

CONCLUSION

Type II was the more prevalent subtype of achalasia in this French multicentre cohort. The older age of patients with type III achalasia suggests a different pathophysiology.

摘要

背景

高分辨率测压法将贲门失弛缓症分为 3 个亚型,采用芝加哥分类。本研究的目的是将该分类应用于法国多中心贲门失弛缓症队列,并比较 3 个亚型的临床和测压特征。

方法

在一项回顾性研究中,收集了诊断为高分辨率测压法贲门失弛缓症患者的食管症状。通过食管胃交界处静息和松弛压力以及上食管括约肌静息压力分析测压数据。根据芝加哥分类对贲门失弛缓症进行分类。

结果

2007 年至 2011 年 8 月,169 例患者被诊断为贲门失弛缓症,其中 14%为 I 型,70%为 II 型,16%为 III 型。III 型患者比 I 型和 II 型年龄更大(62 岁 vs. 52 岁,p = 0.03)。95%的患者主诉吞咽困难,16%的患者诉胸痛(3 个亚型之间无差异);I 型患者中有 50%出现反流,而 II 型和 III 型患者分别有 33%和 22%出现反流(p = 0.10)。食管胃交界处和上食管括约肌压力在 3 组之间无差异。

结论

在这个法国多中心队列中,II 型是贲门失弛缓症更为常见的亚型。III 型贲门失弛缓症患者年龄较大,提示其病理生理学不同。

相似文献

1
The Chicago classification for achalasia in a French multicentric cohort.法国多中心队列中贲门失弛缓症的芝加哥分类。
Dig Liver Dis. 2012 Dec;44(12):976-80. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2012.07.019. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
2
A high-resolution view of achalasia.贲门失弛缓症的高分辨率视图。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2009 Aug;43(7):644-51. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e318176ab94.
3
Balloon dilation of the esophago-gastric junction affects lower and upper esophageal sphincter function in achalasia.球囊扩张食管胃结合部影响贲门失弛缓症的下食管括约肌和上食管括约肌功能。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014 Jan;26(1):69-76. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12228. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
4
Esophageal manometry: a comparison of findings in younger and older patients.食管测压:年轻患者与老年患者检查结果的比较
Am J Gastroenterol. 1998 May;93(5):706-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1998.210_a.x.
5
Two-year follow-up for 45 patients with achalasia who underwent peroral endoscopic myotomy.45例接受经口内镜下肌切开术的贲门失弛缓症患者的两年随访。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 May;47(5):890-6. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu320. Epub 2014 Sep 4.
6
Manometric evaluation of achalasia in the elderly.老年人贲门失弛缓症的测压评估
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005 Feb 15;21(4):431-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02337.x.
7
Histopathologic patterns among achalasia subtypes.贲门失弛缓症各亚型的组织病理学模式。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016 Jan;28(1):139-45. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12711. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
8
Upper esophageal sphincter abnormalities: frequent finding on high-resolution esophageal manometry and associated with poorer treatment response in achalasia.食管上括约肌异常:高分辨率食管测压中的常见发现,且与贲门失弛缓症较差的治疗反应相关。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015 Jan;49(1):17-23. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000157.
9
[Lower esophageal sphincter pressure in patients with achalasia. Is high blood pressure frequent in these patients?].[贲门失弛缓症患者的食管下括约肌压力。这些患者中高血压是否常见?]
Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 2003 Oct-Dec;68(4):258-60.
10
Lower esophageal sphincter relaxation characteristics using a sleeve sensor in clinical manometry.临床测压中使用套管传感器的食管下括约肌松弛特征
Am J Gastroenterol. 1998 Dec;93(12):2373-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1998.00690.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimizing achalasia diagnosis in the era of high-resolution manometry: A Pakistani perspective.在高分辨率测压时代优化贲门失弛缓症的诊断:巴基斯坦视角
JGH Open. 2025 Mar 18;9(3):e70041. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.70041. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Pre- and post-intervention oesophageal pressure topography metrics in the three subtypes of achalasia: A pilot study on Indian adults.贲门失弛缓症三种亚型干预前后的食管压力地形图指标:一项针对印度成年人的初步研究。
Med J Armed Forces India. 2024 Dec;80(Suppl 1):S210-S216. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2023.07.006. Epub 2023 Oct 10.
3
Clinical characteristics and manometric findings of esophageal achalasia-a systematic review regarding differences among three subtypes.
食管失弛缓症的临床特征和测压结果——三种亚型差异的系统综述
J Smooth Muscle Res. 2023;59:14-27. doi: 10.1540/jsmr.59.14.
4
Changes in the Treatment of Primary Esophageal Motility Disorders Imposed by the New Classification for Esophageal Motility Disorders on High Resolution Manometry (Chicago Classification 4.0).高分辨率食管测压新分类(芝加哥分类 4.0)对原发性食管动力障碍治疗的影响。
Adv Ther. 2021 May;38(5):2017-2026. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01714-w. Epub 2021 Mar 27.
5
Value of Multidetector Computed Tomography in the Assessment of Achalasia Subtypes and Detection of Pulmonary and Thoracic Complications.多排螺旋 CT 在贲门失弛缓症亚型评估及肺部和胸部并发症检测中的价值。
Med Princ Pract. 2019;28(6):539-546. doi: 10.1159/000501057. Epub 2019 May 22.
6
Pneumatic Balloon Dilatation for Achalasia Cardia: Outcome, Complications, Success, and Long-term Follow-up.贲门失弛缓症的气囊扩张术:结果、并发症、成功率及长期随访
Euroasian J Hepatogastroenterol. 2017 Jul-Dec;7(2):138-141. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10018-1234. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
7
Comparison of the Outcomes of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Achalasia According to Manometric Subtype.经测压亚型分类的贲门失弛缓症经口内镜肌切开术结局比较。
Gut Liver. 2017 Sep 15;11(5):642-647. doi: 10.5009/gnl16545.
8
The relationship between manometric subtype and outcomes of surgical treatment for patients with achalasia : Achalasia: manometric subtypes.贲门失弛缓症患者的测压亚型与手术治疗结局的关系:贲门失弛缓症:测压亚型。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Dec;31(12):5066-5075. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5570-5. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
9
Clinical Outcomes and Safety of Partial Full-Thickness Myotomy versus Circular Muscle Myotomy in Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Achalasia Patients.贲门失弛缓症患者经口内镜下肌切开术中部分全层肌切开术与环形肌肌切开术的临床结局及安全性比较
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2017;2017:2676513. doi: 10.1155/2017/2676513. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
10
The early efficacy of Heller myotomy in the treatment of Iranian patients with achalasia.赫勒肌切开术治疗伊朗贲门失弛缓症患者的早期疗效。
Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2016 Winter;9(1):30-5.