Institute of Nuclear Science & Technology, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 30197, 00100 Nairobi, Kenya.
Talanta. 2012 Aug 30;98:236-40. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2012.06.081. Epub 2012 Jul 11.
Soil quality assessment (SQA) calls for rapid, simple and affordable but accurate analysis of soil quality indicators (SQIs). Routine methods of soil analysis are tedious and expensive. Energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence and scattering (EDXRFS) spectrometry in conjunction with chemometrics is a potentially powerful method for rapid SQA. In this study, a 25 m Ci (109)Cd isotope source XRF spectrometer was used to realize EDXRFS spectrometry of soils. Glycerol (a simulate of "organic" soil solution) and kaolin (a model clay soil) doped with soil micro (Fe, Cu, Zn) and macro (NO(3)(-), SO(4)(2-), H(2)PO(4)(-)) nutrients were used to train multivariate chemometric calibration models for direct (non-invasive) analysis of SQIs based on partial least squares (PLS) and artificial neural networks (ANN). The techniques were compared for each SQI with respect to speed, robustness, correction ability for matrix effects, and resolution of spectral overlap. The method was then applied to perform direct rapid analysis of SQIs in field soils. A one-way ANOVA test showed no statistical difference at 95% confidence interval between PLS and ANN results compared to reference soil nutrients. PLS was more accurate analyzing C, N, Na, P and Zn (R(2)>0.9) and low SEP of (0.05%, 0.01%, 0.01%, and 1.98 μg g(-1)respectively), while ANN was better suited for analysis of Mg, Cu and Fe (R(2)>0.9 and SEP of 0.08%, 4.02 μg g(-1), and 0.88 μg g(-1) respectively).
土壤质量评估(SQA)需要快速、简单、经济实惠且准确地分析土壤质量指标(SQI)。常规的土壤分析方法繁琐且昂贵。能量色散 X 射线荧光和散射(EDXRFS)光谱与化学计量学相结合,是一种快速 SQA 的潜在强大方法。在这项研究中,使用了一个 25mCi(109)Cd 同位素源 XRF 光谱仪来实现土壤的 EDXRFS 光谱。甘油(“有机”土壤溶液的模拟物)和高岭土(一种模型粘土土壤)中掺杂了土壤微量(Fe、Cu、Zn)和常量(NO3(-)、SO4(2-)、H2PO4(-))养分,用于训练多元化学计量校准模型,以便直接(非侵入式)分析基于偏最小二乘(PLS)和人工神经网络(ANN)的 SQI。比较了每种 SQI 的速度、稳健性、对基质效应的校正能力以及光谱重叠的分辨率。然后将该方法应用于现场土壤中 SQI 的直接快速分析。单向方差分析检验显示,与参考土壤养分相比,PLS 和 ANN 结果在 95%置信区间内没有统计学差异。PLS 更准确地分析 C、N、Na、P 和 Zn(R2>0.9),且 SEP 低(分别为 0.05%、0.01%、0.01%和 1.98μg g-1),而 ANN 更适合分析 Mg、Cu 和 Fe(R2>0.9 和 SEP 分别为 0.08%、4.02μg g-1 和 0.88μg g-1)。