Faculty of Science and Technology, The University of the Basque Country, PO Box 644, 48080 Bilbao, Spain.
Sci Total Environ. 2012 Dec 1;440:115-22. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.07.090. Epub 2012 Aug 30.
Breakdown of organic matter is a key process in streams and rivers, and thus, it has potential to assess functional impairment of river ecosystems. Because the litter-bag method commonly used to measure leaf breakdown is time consuming and expensive, several authors proposed to measure breakdown of wooden sticks instead. Nevertheless, currently there is little information on the performance of wooden sticks versus that of leaves. We compared the breakdown of tongue depressors made of untreated poplar wood, to that of six common leaf species in two large streams in the Basque Country (northern Spain), one polluted and the other unpolluted. Breakdown rates ranged from 0.0011 to 0.0120 day(-1), and were significantly lower in the polluted stream. Wooden sticks performed very similarly to leaves, but were less affected by flood-induced physical abrasion. The ranking of the materials according to their breakdown rate was consistent, irrespective of the stream. The experiments with leaves were 10 times more costly for breakdown rate, 4 times if we include the rest of the variables measured. Therefore wooden sticks offer a promising tool to assess river ecosystem functioning, although more research is necessary to define the thresholds for ecosystem functional impairment.
有机物的分解是溪流和河流中的关键过程,因此,它有可能评估河流生态系统的功能障碍。由于通常用于测量叶片分解的垃圾袋方法既耗时又昂贵,因此有几位作者建议改用木制棒来测量。尽管如此,目前有关木棒与叶片性能的信息却很少。我们在西班牙北部巴斯克地区的两条大型溪流中,比较了未经处理的白杨木制成的压舌板与六种常见叶片物种的分解情况,一条受到污染,另一条未受污染。分解速率范围从 0.0011 到 0.0120 天(-1),在受污染的溪流中明显较低。木棒的性能与叶片非常相似,但受洪水引起的物理磨损的影响较小。根据分解速率对材料进行的排序是一致的,与溪流无关。如果包括测量的其他变量,那么叶片的实验在分解速率方面要花费 10 倍的成本,而如果包括分解速率,则要花费 4 倍。因此,尽管需要进行更多的研究来定义生态系统功能障碍的阈值,但木制棒为评估河流生态系统功能提供了一种有前途的工具。