PRES Clermont Université, Blaise Pascal University, AME2P, EA 3533, BP 80026, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Brain Cogn. 2012 Nov;80(2):277-81. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2012.07.007. Epub 2012 Aug 30.
Psychological disorders arising from bullying at work (BW) are common. The relationship between these disorders and putative markers is not well established.
To measure saliva dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEAS) and saliva cortisol as putative markers in individuals suffering from BW.
Forty one subjects suffering from BW were screened for mental distress at the institute of occupational health in Clermont-Ferrand, France. They were compared with 28 psychologically healthy controls (group C). The conditions causing BW were recorded. The hospital anxiety and depression (HAD) scale, the Beech questionnaire and the visual analogic scale (VAS) of stress were used to determine the psychological consequences of BW. Saliva samples were collected at awakening (7 am), 30 and 60 min after awakening, and then every 2 h until bed time (11 pm).
The BW group had significantly higher scores on the HAD scale, higher stress on the VAS, and a higher score on the Beech questionnaire. They also had a significantly higher saliva concentration of DHEAS. There was no significant difference between groups in cortisol levels at any time, nor in area under the curve (AUC) and cortisol awakening response (CAR). There was a significant positive correlation between HAD and VAS scores and DHEAS levels, but not between cortisol levels or AUC or CAR.
In contrast to saliva cortisol levels, saliva DHEAS levels are modified after psychological distress arising from BW. This discrepancy probably arises from the stability conferred by the very long half life of DHEAS of about 15 h.
工作场所欺凌(BW)引起的心理障碍很常见。这些障碍与假定标志物之间的关系尚未得到很好的确定。
测量患有 BW 的个体的唾液脱氢表雄酮硫酸盐(DHEAS)和唾液皮质醇作为假定标志物。
在法国克莱蒙费朗的职业健康研究所筛选了 41 名患有 BW 的受试者,以检查其精神困扰。将他们与 28 名心理健康的对照组(C 组)进行比较。记录引起 BW 的情况。使用医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HAD)、Beech 问卷和压力视觉模拟量表(VAS)来确定 BW 的心理后果。在早上 7 点(觉醒时)、觉醒后 30 分钟和 60 分钟采集唾液样本,然后每 2 小时采集一次,直到晚上 11 点(就寝时间)。
BW 组 HAD 量表评分显著较高,VAS 评分的压力较大,Beech 问卷评分较高。他们的 DHEAS 唾液浓度也显著较高。两组在任何时间的皮质醇水平、曲线下面积(AUC)和皮质醇觉醒反应(CAR)均无显著差异。HAD 和 VAS 评分与 DHEAS 水平之间存在显著正相关,但皮质醇水平或 AUC 或 CAR 之间没有显著相关性。
与皮质醇水平相比,DHEAS 水平在 BW 引起的心理困扰后发生变化。这种差异可能源于 DHEAS 的半衰期约为 15 小时,因此具有非常长的稳定性。