Suppr超能文献

俄亥俄州家庭医生使用不要住院指令的情况。

The use of do-not-hospitalize orders by family physicians in Ohio.

作者信息

Lipsky M S, Hickey D P, Browning G, Taylor C

机构信息

Mercy Family Practice Residency Program, Mercy Hospital Family Practice Group, Toledo, OH 43624.

出版信息

J Fam Pract. 1990 Jan;30(1):61-4.

PMID:2294162
Abstract

A sample of Ohio family physicians was surveyed by mail questionnaire regarding physician attitudes and practices concerning do-not-hospitalize (DNH) orders. One hundred seventy-three of the 210 physicians who completed the survey provided care for patients in nursing homes. Fifty-eight percent of physicians caring for nursing home patients were familiar with the concept of do not hospitalize, and 42% had utilized a DNH order. The most commonly named reasons for using a DNH order were patient's terminal condition and patient's request. The most common reasons physicians did not use a DNH order were because of family objections and the inability of nursing homes to deliver intravenous antibiotics and fluids. Almost all physicians had encountered a clinical situation where a DNH order might be appropriate, and 73% of physicians familiar with the DNH concept had utilized the order. Familiarizing more physicians with the concept of DNH orders may have great potential for reducing health care costs and preserving patient autonomy. Future studies are needed to validate the concept of do not hospitalize.

摘要

通过邮寄问卷的方式对俄亥俄州家庭医生样本进行了调查,内容涉及医生对“不要住院”(DNH)医嘱的态度和做法。在完成调查的210名医生中,有173人为疗养院的患者提供护理服务。护理院患者的医生中有58%熟悉“不要住院”的概念,42%曾使用过DNH医嘱。使用DNH医嘱最常见的原因是患者的终末期病情和患者的要求。医生不使用DNH医嘱最常见的原因是家属反对以及疗养院无法提供静脉注射抗生素和液体。几乎所有医生都遇到过可能适合下达DNH医嘱的临床情况,熟悉DNH概念的医生中有73%使用过该医嘱。让更多医生熟悉DNH医嘱的概念可能在降低医疗成本和维护患者自主权方面具有巨大潜力。需要进一步的研究来验证“不要住院”这一概念。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验