Suppr超能文献

使用Sure-Gait拐杖和标准腋拐行走时的能量消耗。

Energy expenditure of ambulation using the Sure-Gait crutch and the standard axillary crutch.

作者信息

Annesley A L, Almada-Norfleet M, Arnall D A, Cornwall M W

机构信息

St Joseph's Medical Center, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Phoenix, AZ 85013.

出版信息

Phys Ther. 1990 Jan;70(1):18-23. doi: 10.1093/ptj/70.1.18.

Abstract

Energy expenditure is increased for ambulation with various assistive devices such as canes, walkers, and crutches compared with unassisted ambulation. The purpose of the present investigation was to determine whether a significant difference in oxygen consumption and heart rate existed during ambulation with two different types of crutches. Ten healthy male subjects between the ages of 40 and 60 years participated in this study. Each subject ambulated at 1.5 mph on a treadmill using two different types of crutches--the standard axillary crutch and the Sure-Gait crutch. After walking on the treadmill without an assistive device, subjects ambulated using a three-point, swing-to gait pattern with one of the two types of crutches. This procedure was repeated using the other type of crutch. Oxygen consumption and heart rate were analyzed using an analysis of variance for repeated measures design. The results of the study showed a significant difference (p less than .01) between ambulation with crutches and unassisted ambulation for oxygen consumption and heart rate. No difference, however, was found between the two crutch types.

摘要

与无辅助行走相比,使用拐杖、助行器和拐杖等各种辅助设备行走时的能量消耗会增加。本研究的目的是确定使用两种不同类型的拐杖行走时,耗氧量和心率是否存在显著差异。10名年龄在40至60岁之间的健康男性受试者参与了这项研究。每个受试者在跑步机上以每小时1.5英里的速度使用两种不同类型的拐杖行走——标准腋拐和Sure-Gait拐杖。在没有辅助设备的情况下在跑步机上行走后,受试者使用两种拐杖中的一种以三点式、摆至步态模式行走。使用另一种拐杖重复此过程。使用重复测量设计的方差分析来分析耗氧量和心率。研究结果表明,使用拐杖行走与无辅助行走之间在耗氧量和心率方面存在显著差异(p小于0.01)。然而,两种拐杖类型之间未发现差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验