Annesley A L, Almada-Norfleet M, Arnall D A, Cornwall M W
St Joseph's Medical Center, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Phoenix, AZ 85013.
Phys Ther. 1990 Jan;70(1):18-23. doi: 10.1093/ptj/70.1.18.
Energy expenditure is increased for ambulation with various assistive devices such as canes, walkers, and crutches compared with unassisted ambulation. The purpose of the present investigation was to determine whether a significant difference in oxygen consumption and heart rate existed during ambulation with two different types of crutches. Ten healthy male subjects between the ages of 40 and 60 years participated in this study. Each subject ambulated at 1.5 mph on a treadmill using two different types of crutches--the standard axillary crutch and the Sure-Gait crutch. After walking on the treadmill without an assistive device, subjects ambulated using a three-point, swing-to gait pattern with one of the two types of crutches. This procedure was repeated using the other type of crutch. Oxygen consumption and heart rate were analyzed using an analysis of variance for repeated measures design. The results of the study showed a significant difference (p less than .01) between ambulation with crutches and unassisted ambulation for oxygen consumption and heart rate. No difference, however, was found between the two crutch types.
与无辅助行走相比,使用拐杖、助行器和拐杖等各种辅助设备行走时的能量消耗会增加。本研究的目的是确定使用两种不同类型的拐杖行走时,耗氧量和心率是否存在显著差异。10名年龄在40至60岁之间的健康男性受试者参与了这项研究。每个受试者在跑步机上以每小时1.5英里的速度使用两种不同类型的拐杖行走——标准腋拐和Sure-Gait拐杖。在没有辅助设备的情况下在跑步机上行走后,受试者使用两种拐杖中的一种以三点式、摆至步态模式行走。使用另一种拐杖重复此过程。使用重复测量设计的方差分析来分析耗氧量和心率。研究结果表明,使用拐杖行走与无辅助行走之间在耗氧量和心率方面存在显著差异(p小于0.01)。然而,两种拐杖类型之间未发现差异。