Fowler Bruce A
Division of Toxicology and Environmental Medicine, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), Atlanta, GA, 30333, USA,
Exp Suppl. 2012;101:459-70. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7643-8340-4_16.
Over the last 30 years, the field of biomarkers has greatly expanded as early and specific endpoints for monitoring cellular responses to various disease states and exposures to drugs and chemical agents. They have enjoyed some success as predictors of health outcomes for a number of clinical diseases, but the application to chemical exposure risk assessments has been more limited. Biomarkers may be classified into categories of markers of exposure, effect, and susceptibility. Currently, "omics" biomarkers (i.e., genomic, proteomic, and metabolomic/metabonomic) are the major classes of biomarkers under development. These markers represent a continuum of cellular responses to drug or chemical exposures and provide linkages to mechanisms of cell injury/cell death or carcinogenic transformation. On the other hand, translation and application of these biomarkers for risk assessment has been limited due to validation and interpretation issues that need to be addressed in order for these potentially extremely valuable endpoints to reach their full potential as predictive tools for public health. This short chapter will briefly review these three "omics" biomarker classes and examine some validation/translation aspects needed in order for them to reach their full potential and acceptance as valuable tools for application to risk assessment.
在过去30年中,生物标志物领域得到了极大的扩展,成为监测细胞对各种疾病状态以及药物和化学制剂暴露反应的早期和特异性终点指标。作为多种临床疾病健康结局的预测指标,它们取得了一定的成功,但在化学暴露风险评估中的应用则较为有限。生物标志物可分为暴露标志物、效应标志物和易感性标志物几类。目前,“组学”生物标志物(即基因组学、蛋白质组学和代谢组学/代谢组学)是正在开发的主要生物标志物类别。这些标志物代表了细胞对药物或化学暴露的连续反应,并与细胞损伤/细胞死亡或致癌转化机制相关联。另一方面,由于存在验证和解释问题,这些生物标志物在风险评估中的转化和应用受到限制,而要使这些潜在的极有价值的终点指标充分发挥其作为公共卫生预测工具的潜力,就需要解决这些问题。本章将简要回顾这三类“组学”生物标志物,并探讨为使其充分发挥潜力并被接受为风险评估的有价值工具所需的一些验证/转化方面的问题。