Javadinejad Shahrzad, Razavi Mohamad, Birang Reza, Atefat Mohamad
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Dental School, Islamic Azad University - Khorasgan Branch, Isfahan, Iran.
Indian J Dent Res. 2012 Mar-Apr;23(2):247-50. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.100435.
The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of different techniques of surface preparation on the microleakage of a sealant applied with traditional acid etching and self-etched bonding agent.
A total of 60 extracted third molars were randomly assigned into six groups (n = 10/each). The occlusal surfaces were sealed with a sealant (Clinpro) after one of the following pretreatments: (1) phosphoric acid etching; (2) Prompt L-Pop; (3) laser + etching; (4) laser + Prompt L-Pop; (5) air abrasion + etching; (6) air abrasion + Prompt L-Pop. The specimens were immersed in a 0.5% basic fuchsin solution. Buccolingual cuts parallel to the long axis of the tooth were made. The surfaces were scored 0--2 for extent of microleakage using a microscope and the data were analyzed statistically.
The poorest results were obtained with laser + Prompt L-Pop which showed a greater number of specimens with microleakage (80%). Air abrasion surface preparation + phosphoric acid etching showed less microleakage than the other groups (40%). Kruskal--Wallis and t-tests revealed no significant difference in microleakage between six groups. conclusion: The self-etching adhesive studied seems an attractive alternative to the acid-etch technique for sealant application in young children where simplifications in the clinical procedure are warranted. No significant difference was noted between the different types of enamel preparation before fissure sealant.
本体外研究的目的是评估不同表面处理技术对使用传统酸蚀和自酸蚀粘结剂应用封闭剂时微渗漏的影响。
总共60颗拔除的第三磨牙被随机分为六组(每组n = 10)。在进行以下预处理之一后,用封闭剂(Clinpro)封闭咬合面:(1)磷酸酸蚀;(2)Prompt L-Pop;(3)激光+酸蚀;(4)激光+Prompt L-Pop;(5)空气喷砂+酸蚀;(6)空气喷砂+Prompt L-Pop。将标本浸入0.5%碱性品红溶液中。制作平行于牙齿长轴的颊舌向切片。使用显微镜对微渗漏程度进行0至2分的评分,并对数据进行统计学分析。
激光+Prompt L-Pop组的结果最差,有更多标本出现微渗漏(80%)。空气喷砂表面处理+磷酸酸蚀组的微渗漏比其他组少(40%)。Kruskal-Wallis检验和t检验显示六组之间微渗漏无显著差异。结论:对于需要简化临床操作的幼儿封闭剂应用,所研究的自酸蚀粘结剂似乎是酸蚀技术的一个有吸引力的替代方法。在窝沟封闭前,不同类型的釉质处理之间未观察到显著差异。